
TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Senator Brands Cheney 'Lead Chickenhawk'
Posted by Trancer-X on Apr-29-2004 02:28:
Senator Brands Cheney 'Lead Chickenhawk'
| quote: |
Originally posted by surferfb
A list of some of the chickenhawks:
George W. Bush
Dick Cheney
Spencer Abraham
Elliot Abrams
Ken Adelman
John Bolton
Andrew Card
Don Evans
Asa Hutchison
Richard Perle
Harvey Pitt
Tommy Thompson
John Walters
Paul Wolfowitz
John Ashcroft
More can be found here. |
Senator Brands Cheney 'Lead Chickenhawk'
Wed Apr 28, 5:14 PM ET
By DONNA DE LA CRUZ, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - Democratic Sen. Frank Lautenberg on Wednesday called Vice President Dick Cheney (news - web sites) the "lead chickenhawk" in an escalating war of words over the Vietnam-era military service of President Bush (news - web sites), Democratic rival John Kerry (news - web sites) and the vice president.
"We know who the chickenhawks are," the New Jersey senator said on the Senate floor. "They talk tough on national defense and military issues and cast aspersions on others, but when it was their turn to serve, they were AWOL from courage."
The Bush-Cheney campaign had no immediate comment on Lautenberg's criticism.
Cheney received five student and marriage deferments of military service during the Vietnam War. The vice president has not questioned Kerry's military record, but has argued that the four-term Massachusetts senator's voting record on defense and intelligence issues casts doubts on his judgment for commander in chief.
Bush served in the Texas Air National Guard during the war, and Democrats have questioned whether he fulfilled his duties. To prove the president showed up for duty during a temporary transfer to an Alabama base, the White House has released pay records and a copy of a dental exam Bush received on the base.
Kerry was a decorated Navy veteran in Vietnam and an anti-war demonstrator when he returned home. The presumptive Democratic nominee has said Bush and Cheney have no credibility in criticizing his service and anti-war effort because Bush has been dogged by questions about his Guard attendance and Cheney sought numerous deferments.
The criticisms, which for the most part have been limited to the campaign trail, spilled over into Congress on Wednesday.
Lautenberg defined a chickenhawk as "having the shriek of a hawk but the backbone of a chicken," and said, "and now the chickenhawks are squawking about Senator Kerry. The lead chickenhawk against Senator Kerry is the vice president."
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., emerging from a meeting for Democratic lawmakers with Kerry campaign chairwoman Jeanne Shaheen, said the president should explain what he was doing while in the National Guard.
"As far as we know, Senator Kerry got three Purple Hearts for risking his life in Vietnam and President Bush got a dental examination in Alabama," Pelosi said.
Speaking on the House floor Wednesday, Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., characterized Bush's military service as "missing without action."
"We know that Senator John Kerry fought with courage and valor on behalf of his country," McDermott said. "We know that George W. Bush flew under the radar, because that's the only explanation for how a pilot suspended from flying parachuted into a Republican political campaign in Alabama."
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=sto...ocrats_cheney_2
Posted by smokeape on Apr-29-2004 03:20:
Lautenberg (aka Lautenberg Amendment) is not so well liked in the military either...
[[[smoke]]]
Posted by Q5echo on Apr-29-2004 07:28:
this is gettin very fukin stoopid
Posted by MisterOpus1 on Apr-29-2004 13:57:
While I found Sen. Frank Lautenberg's speech pretty interesting (and would no doubt agree with his stance to a certain extent), I thought it was just a bit misleading in regards to being a rebuttal against Cheney. I don't believe Cheney mentioned anything about Kerry's Vietnam war record. Rather, Cheney was referring to Kerry's voting record on war policies (which really is rather ironic given Cheney's similar war voting record, but I digress). In essence, Lautenberg was creating a strawman argument for attacking/refuting an argument that Cheney wasn't using. If Lautenberg had mentioned perhaps other Republican opponents/AM radio conservative mouthpieces, etc., then I believe his argument would have been a little more valid.
I still liked what he said, though. A great many Bush Admin. members (and Bush included) are the biggest chickenhawks we've ever seen. And I do find it ironic how the Repubs. viciously attacked Clinton for skipping out on the draft, yet the large handful of Repubs. up in the Administration have taken very similar measures, not to mention continue to attack a Vietnam veteran with 5 medals. Pretty sad, really.
Finally, I also thought it was interesting to hear McCain play referee and come to the defense of Cheney. A couple of weeks ago he defended Kerry's Vietnam record with vigor, and now he's working the other side of the fence as well. He's being a pretty good centrist in the matter, and I actually appreciate his stance.
Posted by occrider on Apr-29-2004 14:26:
| quote: |
Originally posted by MisterOpus1
Finally, I also thought it was interesting to hear McCain play referee and come to the defense of Cheney. A couple of weeks ago he defended Kerry's Vietnam record with vigor, and now he's working the other side of the fence as well. He's being a pretty good centrist in the matter, and I actually appreciate his stance. |
Fess up ... you heard that on NPR didn't you??? I only ask cuz I heard a remarkably similar account of the events in congress yesterday.
Posted by MisterOpus1 on Apr-29-2004 14:34:
| quote: |
Originally posted by occrider
Fess up ... you heard that on NPR didn't you??? I only ask cuz I heard a remarkably similar account of the events in congress yesterday. |
BUSTED!
NPR AND CNN! That darn liberal media bias is just gettin' to me!
I believe the NPR show was a discussion/light debate between David Brooks (conservative) of the NYTimes and someone with a liberal viewpoint from the Washington Post (his name escapes me ATM). Robert Siegal was the host, and he offered some good insight in his own right. I was listening to it on my way home. Afterwards I read both speeches on the internet at home.
I just thought up a question to ask, but I think I'll keep this on topic and create a new thread instead.
Posted by occrider on Apr-29-2004 14:44:
| quote: |
Originally posted by MisterOpus1
BUSTED!
NPR AND CNN! That darn liberal media bias is just gettin' to me! |
/Looks over shoulder
Not that I was listening to that liberal garbage!! Uhhhh uhhhh ... I was only flipping through radio stations on my way to limbaugh and the dial got stuck!
Edit: Yup that was the program I heard.
Posted by DaveSZ on Apr-29-2004 14:56:
CNN is anything but liberal nowadays.
I can't watch that channel without a piece of my brain melting.

In fact I'd rather watch Sesamie Street, for at least I'd learn something.

Posted by occrider on Apr-29-2004 15:24:
| quote: |
Originally posted by DaveSZ
CNN is anything but liberal nowadays.
|
Course not. It's the same as any other 24 hour news service bbc, reuters, etc.
Posted by Yoepus on Apr-29-2004 15:41:
| quote: |
Originally posted by occrider
Course not. It's the same as any other 24 hour news service bbc, reuters, etc. |
I don't think we can brand "msnbc" as a news channel anymore in all fairness. Thats the only news channel I get here (after they killed my CNN) and its anything but news. Even the local news is more informative of national and worldly events than there garbage.
I miss foxnews
Posted by Shakka on Apr-29-2004 16:04:
| quote: |
Originally posted by DaveSZ
In fact I'd rather watch Sesamie Street, for at least I'd learn something.
|
Well, at least you admit to your limited IQ.
Posted by Yoepus on Apr-29-2004 19:57:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Shakka
Well, at least you admit to your limited IQ. |
Give it here Shakka! High Five!
Posted by MisterOpus1 on Apr-29-2004 20:10:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Shakka
Well, at least you admit to your limited IQ. |
Zing!
One for the conservatives!
You bastard.
Posted by Trancer-X on May-02-2004 01:34:
| quote: |
Originally posted by MisterOpus1
One for the conservatives!
|
Almost.
Albeit subconsciously, Shakka is just alluding to his own low IQ denial in which he is so deeply ensconced.
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.