Originals or Remixes? - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Polls - Music Related
-- Originals or Remixes?

Posted by Floorfiller on May-14-2004 20:37:

Originals or Remixes?

ok so on a vinyl...

lets say you could only have 2 tracks...would you rather have

2 original artist songs

or

1 original tune and a remix of that tune

or

would you rather have two seprate releases one with 2 originals and the other with 2 remixes

Posted by Stuku on May-14-2004 21:18:

floorfiller stop making stupid polls

Posted by Thunder5 on May-15-2004 00:47:

1 Original work and 1 Remix of that work

Or

floorfiller stop making stupid polls

Having hard time choosing between those two...

Posted by Spin Doctor on May-15-2004 02:47:

I�d rather have four tunes on the one disc.

Posted by Thunder5 on May-15-2004 02:51:

quote:
Originally posted by Spin Doctor
I�d rather have four tunes on the one disc.

Now that would be a overkill..

Posted by Floorfiller on May-15-2004 03:36:

quote:
Originally posted by Spin Doctor
I�d rather have four tunes on the one disc.

yeah i suppose i could do that...i just want the quality to be the best.

Posted by XeQtOr on May-15-2004 07:18:

1 original and 1 remix.

Posted by TranceMuzik02 on May-16-2004 11:36:

floorfiller stop making stupid polls

Posted by Floorfiller on May-16-2004 16:13:

i just wanted to get a sense of what the consumer wants...is that so wrong

Posted by Spin Doctor on May-16-2004 20:58:

Overkill, why? I�m f****** fed up of paying for a tune twice over because of different mixes. You can generally fit two tunes on one side of a vinyl if they aren�t ridiculously long epics, so why can�t we have one 12� with four tunes, regardless of whether they be other mixes or other productions by the artist? Profit seems to be the answer to that question.

rar, madness!

Posted by Fundamental on May-19-2004 01:16:

1 original & 1 remix please. Second tunes by the same artist on vinyls tend to be pretty poor.

Posted by starglider on May-19-2004 03:01:

Two original works. Obviously if the b-side is an afterthought or something the producer dug out of the depths of his studio then it's not going to be a quality release, but all the same.

Posted by emander on Jun-05-2004 17:07:

Depends...

Posted by R.j. on Jun-09-2004 11:35:

quote:
Originally posted by Stuku
floorfiller stop making stupid polls

haha

Posted by tranceCDs on Jun-09-2004 13:50:

I like original mixes more then remixes...

Posted by M1cro5lave on Jun-13-2004 02:47:

1 original, 1 remix.

Posted by ()mar.( on Jun-16-2004 17:10:

You always want the original, just as a respect thing to the artist, and one remix. If possible, more remixes, cuz I personally love them.

Posted by fksfan on Jun-20-2004 18:14:

i choose original and rmx
sometimes they are a lot better than org

Posted by GrimReaper on Jun-20-2004 19:15:

It depends.. if its Oliver Lieb or likes related, i would prefer 2 originals on 1 vinyl but that's just me.. 1 original and 1 remix works mostly as well.

It really depends on a release, hard to say which would be the best and only correct solution.

Posted by halexander837 on Jun-28-2004 05:20:

If the original is horrible,

I'm finding a re-mix.

Or if the re-mix is bad,

I'm sticking to the original.

Posted by trak_one on Jul-04-2004 21:39:

I like remixes better because you have more brilliant mind's at work than you would with just the original.

Posted by Digital Rain on Jul-09-2004 02:08:

1 Original work and 1 Remix of that work