TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- 11 years of Liberal government corruption in a nutshell


Posted by Jayx1 on May-25-2004 23:12:

11 years of Liberal government corruption in a nutshell

Government Corruption
The Liberals made honesty and integrity the pillars of their 1993 campaign. Nonetheless, in recent years the Chr�tien government has been hit with wave after wave of scandals:

In 1997, Liberal fundraiser Pierre Corbeil was convicted of influence peddling for pressuring businesses to pay kickbacks to the Liberal party in order to receive federal job grants.

In 2000, the Human Resources Department came under scrutiny in what journalists dubbed the �Billion Dollar Boondoggle,� when it turned out that over $1 billion in job training funds had disappeared when Alfonse Gagliano was Minister of the department.
Later in 2000, Gagliano came under fire again in his position as Minister of Public Works. It was revealed that the department awarded millions in advertising contracts to Groupaction, a Montreal advertising firm that employed Gagliano�s son. In January 2002, Chr�tien removed Gagliano from Public Works and appointed him ambassador to Denmark.

In May 2002, Auditor General Sheila Fraser released a report condemning the federal governments� dealings with Groupaction. The RCMP subsequently launched an investigation into $1.6 million in advertising contracts awarded to the firm.
Within weeks of the Auditor Generals� report, Chr�tien was forced to shuffle his cabinet after two more ministers faced conflict of interest allegations. Don Boudria, Gagliano�s replacement as Minister of Public Works, was demoted for spending a ski weekend with his family at a chalet owned by Groupe Everest, another Quebec advertising firm that received millions in contracts from the Public Works department. Defence Minister Art Eggleton was removed from Cabinet altogether for paying an ex-girlfriend over $35,000 to write a report on post-traumatic stress disorder. Not only had the department already paid for a similar report, but the final result was barely fourteen pages long.
In late May, Solicitor General Lawrence MacAulay faced conflict of interest allegations after it was revealed he consulted with the RCMP about providing a PEI college with a grant for law training courses. The President of the college was MacAulay�s brother.
In June 2003, Canada�s Privacy Commissioner, George Radwanski, was forced to resign amid allegations he had altered documents and filed false expense claims. During the Auditor General�s investigation into Radwanski�s affairs it was discovered that, the day before his appointment as Privacy Commissioner, Revenue Canada forgave $540,000 Radwanski owed in back taxes. The Prime Minister�s Office (PMO) has consistently claimed it knew nothing about Radwanski�s tax situation and did not play a role in Revenue Canada�s decision to forgive the debt.

Finally, there is the ongoing controversy over job grants and other economic funds distributed to Chr�tien's home riding of Shawinigan. For example, Liberal organizer Paul Lemire was convicted of defrauding businesses of $200,000 in HRDC grants.

While some scandals were more serious than others, together they form a picture of a government that Chr�tien biographer Lawrence Martin calls �an ethical disaster.� Furthermore, the problem shows no signs of abating. Currently, five Cabinet Ministers are under fire for accepting hospitality from the Irvings, New Brunswick�s most powerful family. In a recent speech, Canadian Alliance leader Stephen Harper blamed the scandals for lowering Canada�s ranking on a global competitiveness scale (Canada dropped from ninth place to sixteenth in one year). �The ethical deficit is harming our country,� he said.

Source: http://www.mapleleafweb.com/feature...low-points.html


Remember that during this time Paul Martin was the finance minister who is in effect the second most powerful person in politics in Canada.


Posted by harcourt on May-25-2004 23:17:

Must you pollute this board with new threads for every single political topic you read about online, then proceed to copy/paste the contents here? Pick a thread and use that for all your political discussions.


Posted by Jayx1 on May-25-2004 23:21:

Must you pollute the boards with your whining?

There is an election going on. This is a fresh topic thread clearly marked with a title that indicates that it is as such. If you dont like it... DONT CLICK ON IT!!

Grow up!


Posted by harcourt on May-25-2004 23:29:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
Must you pollute the boards with your whining?

There is an election going on. This is a fresh topic thread clearly marked with a title that indicates that it is as such. If you dont like it... DONT CLICK ON IT!!

Grow up!


I didn't have to click on it to bother me, I see you and your topics in the thread list. It's a repeat of the "breaking news" section of the paper posted online. Nothing but reposting of articles you read somewhere else. Pick a thread for your political discussion and keep to it, this isn't the first time someone's said something about your insistant political thread posting.


Posted by Jayx1 on May-25-2004 23:32:

Yet not only do my threads get many responses, other people are motivated to make their own... As for this thread, again no matter the content, if you dont like it dont click and dont come back to it.
This site even has a window that pops up with the first few sentances of a thread so that you can preview it without even clicking on it! It doesnt get much easier to ignore a thread than that...



Dont worry i created a thread especially for you and your type... Enjoy it


Posted by d!abolic on May-25-2004 23:40:

Holy shit, i'm starting an advertising agency and going after government contracts


Posted by Jayx1 on May-25-2004 23:45:

As Gary Dunford wrote last weekend. Something like: How do you become a "liberal friendly business" and how do i sign up? Im missing out!!


Posted by dEsidEL on May-26-2004 01:25:

KarateKid



click HERE




Posted by Spike on May-26-2004 01:49:

lol


Posted by Matt on May-26-2004 02:21:

11 years of Harper and the Conservatives in office would yield even worse results.


Posted by Jayx1 on May-26-2004 03:10:

it doesnt get much worse than a missing billion dollars among all the other things.

Im willing to give the conservative four years to prove themselves rather than reward the liberals for their scandelous conduct.


Posted by d!abolic on May-26-2004 03:24:

quote:
Originally posted by dEsidEL


click HERE



Man what the fuck, now i have to go through all the menus to remove him?


Posted by ShadoWolf on May-26-2004 03:26:

quote:
Originally posted by Matt
11 years of Harper and the Conservatives in office would yield even worse results.


None of the other parties would be nearly as corrupt.


Posted by Matt on May-26-2004 03:26:

quote:
Originally posted by d!abolic
Man what the fuck, now i have to go through all the menus to remove him?


well... if you really want to

that link have given me a new peace of mind.


Posted by Fir3start3r on May-26-2004 03:28:

quote:
Originally posted by tw1tch
Must you pollute this board with new threads for every single political topic you read about online, then proceed to copy/paste the contents here? Pick a thread and use that for all your political discussions.


You know what?
I already tried that...

Jayx1; It's one thing to have some political 'information' but the personal political biasing is starting to leave a bitter taste.

Do us all a favour and tone it down a notch?
You've made your views regarding the Liberals quite clear thanks.
(and don't give me that, "then don't click on it bull#@$")

*yawn*


Posted by Matt on May-26-2004 03:29:

quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
You know what?
I already tried that...

Jayx1; It's one thing to have some political 'information' but the personal political biasing is starting to leave a bitter taste.

Do us all a favour and tone it down a notch?
You've made your views regarding the Liberals quite clear thanks.
(and don't give me that, "then don't click on it bull#@$")

*yawn*



listen to this man, HE PLAYED QUAKE 2 JAILBREAK


Posted by Fir3start3r on May-26-2004 03:30:

quote:
Originally posted by Matt
listen to this man, HE PLAYED QUAKE 2 JAILBREAK


OMG!

is that YOU???


Posted by Matt on May-26-2004 03:31:

quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
OMG!

is that YOU???



<<< Cyprus


back in the day...




heh... va juji.


Posted by ShadoWolf on May-26-2004 03:47:

quote:
Originally posted by Matt
<<< Cyprus


back in the day...




heh... va juji.



hey I played Jailbreak too!

I was a bigger fan of 3-Team CTF though.. best mod ever, and best maps ever, period!


Posted by kwongandy on May-26-2004 05:49:

nice one emery. if only jayx1 would post positive items about the pcs, maybe he would have some credibility. bashing liberals is not the way to go and garnish votes. i wonder if he/she is a card carrying member. the only value in rehashing history is if you believe that history is doomed to repeat itself. tell me where the country is going, not where it has been. it may be that politics have a five year shelf life but show me where stephen harper will take us. are we gonna kiss ass to the usa and apologize for not standing with our closest allies? i was speaking to a server admin down in the states. he thought it was canada day on monday. believe me, americans don't make much decisions where canada is weighed with such significance. we have a tenth of their population. let's celebrate our uniqueness and be happy with that. yes, the liberals have spawned scandals, but show me your ideal allocation of money. the population base in canada is aging, fast. health care will remain the focus for the next 50 years. of course the money is needed, but tell me where you are gonna take it from? how are tax cuts gonna save my parents from long hospital waits? the answer is not as simple as voting for someone else other than liberal. i believe in voting, but i'll weigh the pros and cons before i cast that ballot. i believe everyone should vote; it's our right. please stop spamming us and hiding behind a veil that you're informing us. you are the one acting like a child. are you swaying us to vote pcs? no, cause the only impression you're giving us is negative which will imbue us to vote for liberal.

how does this ignore function work, emery?


Posted by Jayx1 on May-26-2004 11:57:

whatever

if you read what i said before its that im against the liberals due to their corrupt ways. That all politcal parties suck but my choice is the Conservatives. Ive never said that the conservatives are ideal. I have also highlighted many good points about the conservatives. I cannot say the same for the NDP because IMO that party is a joke.

I have also stated on many occasions that if the Liberal party were not so corrupt and actually acted according to their supposed ideals, that they would actually be more in tune to how i feel than aby other party. However, in practice they have been a disaster and deserve to be thrown out.

If you dont like my postings you have the option not to click on it or the option to ignore me. Either way, please use these options and maybe we can all get a little more peace around here.


Posted by crazedcanuck on May-26-2004 12:07:

quote:
Originally posted by Matt
11 years of Harper and the Conservatives in office would yield even worse results.


Nice crystal ball you got there.

Honestly, the people of Ontario didn't think much of Dalton McGuinty for nearly a full decade, but threw him in because the incumbent had been such a negative failure.

I think the same thing should happen here.. throw out those in power... they are clearly abusing it and not even making any progress.

After 11 yrs in power, do you not think this enough time to enact your original platform you campaigned on... to do the things you promised.. to reform the country for the best and positive?? None of this has happened... broken promise and a broken social structure in the country is what we are left with, with the "haves" steadily increasing their control over the "have nots". Banks and gas comapnies report record profits, meanwhile our taxes go up and our services go down, and the government claims to have billions in extra cash laying around while asking for more of ours and threatening user fees (which have already been inplace @ the municipal lvl for years).

I am not going to preach or beat a drum for another party, since I don't have the answers, but to believe in a government that has been the face of mismanagement and deplorable behaviour for over a decade is madness. How can they be better than anyone else??? No other party has been in power for such a long time and done so little of what they promised!! How in the hell can anyone do WORSE?? They can't, and that's the truth of the matter.



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.