TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Producers Promotion
-- RiCo-Freq Limit (Finally I get to play with my synths)


Posted by RiCo on May-30-2004 06:27:

RiCo-Freq Limit (Finally I get to play with my synths)

Well guys, I found some time today and decided to try to produce something. It's been pretty long so I need to get polished again but I don't think it sounds that bad, except the mastering and mixing that's a little poor...one of Truth's tweeter amp is throwing current and fried the tweeter, so it's hard to work like that. I hope you like it...I decided to make it a little bit hard. Comments are welcome. If somebody wants to join me to finish it, you're more than welcome; I'd be glad to have a partner for this song


RiCo-Freq Limit


Posted by EternalMusic on May-30-2004 07:23:

This is abit hard bor my ears , but sounds good. Maybe add some perc?


Posted by BuRoLovesTrance on May-30-2004 09:49:

I have listened to your " Freq Limit " and all I can say is that it needs more variations. I think it is simple, but this is only a sample, I'll wait for the final mix...


Posted by RiCo on May-30-2004 15:14:

Yeah, it's nowhere near done. That's just a little draft. Thanks anyway for the comments


Posted by DjSimonB on May-30-2004 15:18:

Hard and dark, I like it nice build up. I gotta say I don't like the panning bit about halfway through the sample... I'm not saying you should get rid of it totally, but it could be done better. I'm no expert so I couldn't really tell you HOW to do it better, but that's just what I think...


Posted by RiCo on May-30-2004 15:37:

Oh really? Gosh, I did the panning because I like unpredictable stuff like that. Is it a clean panning or different? I cound't tell because one monitor is broke. I used headphones and it sounded fine. Let me know, so I can change it. Thanks for the tip


Posted by DjSimonB on May-30-2004 15:42:

quote:
Originally posted by RiCo
Oh really? Gosh, I did the panning because I like unpredictable stuff like that. Is it a clean panning or different? I cound't tell because one monitor is broke. I used headphones and it sounded fine. Let me know, so I can change it. Thanks for the tip


I guess I don't really like how the melody almost disappears when it pans, did you filter it?


Posted by RiCo on May-30-2004 15:46:

I sweep phased it.

Well, I liked that idea of the sound dissapearing, but yeah it dissapears and it sounds more accidental than purposeful . I'll try regular panning. Maybe I'll like it more. Thanks for clarifying.


Posted by ze7 on May-30-2004 16:02:

Pretty good,i liked the panning thing in the middle,and with a little polishing i bet it could sound pretty sweet.


Posted by RiCo on May-30-2004 16:12:

Ha, thanks!


Posted by Woody4eva on May-30-2004 18:31:

This is a nice sample. Needs more variation, and something... more to it. I know you're probably planning to add some things to it. I like the panning, it works well. The reverse kicks aren't quite in time, moved to the left or right a little bit and that would sound good.


Posted by RiCo on May-30-2004 18:39:

Thanks, guy . So you're saying the "reversy" portion of the reverse drums is not in time...do you mean it doesn't syncro with the regular bass drum sound?


Posted by Woody4eva on May-30-2004 20:59:

When the reversed sample peaks, it's not in a quantized position, if you know what I mean.


Posted by neil_f on May-30-2004 21:53:

Blatantly keep the panning bit, its good ;]
All in all, it's good, needs completing, but then you knew that already ;]


Posted by RiCo on May-31-2004 03:28:

I fixed the panning a little bit...it's more syncronized now. I uploaded a better version in place of the other one, but this one is 32k for modem users. It's starting to take shape.



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.