schranz? .... nein oder ja ? - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- schranz? .... nein oder ja ?
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »

Posted by [N]�k|��[Z] on Jun-07-2004 17:00:

schranz? .... nein oder ja ?

fuck techno... its old news... the likes of robert natus and viper xxl pushing the new harder grinding techno.. schranz. but what you all make of it?.... is it yet more senseless noise that i have to force my mates to listen to... or do you think you could seriously go till 6am and grind like fuck to sum of the most industrious techno sounds around?

discuss

btw im currently listening to schranz total 7.0 mixed by viper xxl

EDIT: it appears ppl think im slating schranz... quite the contrary infact c'est fantastique

Posted by Mr.Mystery on Jun-07-2004 17:10:

Who the fuck makes up these genre names...

Posted by [N]�k|��[Z] on Jun-07-2004 17:10:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
Who the fuck makes up these genre names...

chris liebing actually

Posted by Ian on Jun-07-2004 17:14:

Posted by Ian on Jun-07-2004 17:16:

oh and schranz 5 Robert Natus <3

Posted by muravei on Jun-07-2004 17:22:

quote:
Originally posted by [N]�k|��[Z]
chris liebing actually

True. Chris Liebing "invented" Schranz. Liebing himself doesn't consider it a genre - just another direction of techno, as he himself has sayd...but he's always pretty modest about his achievements...

Schranz sucks as production...but in a party it makes my neck hurt...

Posted by Noisician on Jun-07-2004 17:37:

Re: schranz? .... nein oder ja ?

quote:
Originally posted by [N]�k|��[Z]
is it yet more senseless noise that i have to force my mates to listen to

silly rabbit

Posted by [N]�k|��[Z] on Jun-07-2004 17:39:

Re: Re: schranz? .... nein oder ja ?

quote:
Originally posted by Noisician

lol u misunderstand.... i mean is it another style i have to force my mates to listen to as they think its wank

silly happy hardcore head

Posted by UWM on Jun-07-2004 17:52:

Spunkcore, the next generation!

Posted by Ian on Jun-07-2004 18:04:

quote:
Originally posted by UWM
Spunkcore, the next generation!

inform me what happens when you make a spunkcore production robert..

Posted by UWM on Jun-07-2004 18:08:

quote:
Originally posted by Ian^
inform me what happens when you make a spunkcore production robert..

I'll make one up in fruity quick like and send you a sample

Posted by DarkFall01 on Jun-07-2004 18:15:

I've heard very little Schranz, but what I've heard is crazy
Sven Wittenkind is all I can think of right now...

Posted by rob_sardellitti on Jun-07-2004 19:36:

pretty wild stuff

i listen to schranz when i work out..gets me really fuckin pumped

Posted by Dmatrox on Jun-07-2004 19:42:

im a noob, what the hell is schranz? like techno or something?

Posted by Elyksir on Jun-07-2004 19:51:

i hate it!

Posted by Noisician on Jun-07-2004 20:24:

Re: schranz? .... nein oder ja ?

speaking of the "most industrious techno sounds", i think this kind of sound characterizes industrial techno better than schranz does.

Posted by [N]�k|��[Z] on Jun-07-2004 21:05:

Re: Re: schranz? .... nein oder ja ?

quote:
Originally posted by Noisician
speaking of the "most industrious techno sounds", i think this kind of sound characterizes industrial techno better than schranz does.

for a smart guy you seem to miss the point quite frequently , you know aswell as i do that theres harder shit out there, and i used to [and still do sumtimes] listen to it.

but schranz is a little more accessable id have thought

Posted by Noisician on Jun-07-2004 21:21:

Re: Re: Re: schranz? .... nein oder ja ?

quote:
Originally posted by [N]�k|��[Z]
for a smart guy you seem to miss the point quite frequently , you know aswell as i do that theres harder shit out there, and i used to [and still do sumtimes] listen to it.

er... you missed the point, jay . that "harder shit" that's out there could hardly be classified as industrial TECHNO. maybe industrial hardcore or downright pure noise, but not techno. i just pointed out that schranz wouldn't be the best description of such a genre. besides, industrial does not necessarily imply hard. just because schranz is all fast 'n distorted doesn't mean it's 'industrial'. the word is awfully overused nowadays.

Posted by [N]�k|��[Z] on Jun-07-2004 21:25:

Re: Re: Re: Re: schranz? .... nein oder ja ?

quote:
Originally posted by Noisician
er... you missed the point, jay . that "harder shit" that's out there could hardly be classified as industrial TECHNO. maybe industrial hardcore or downright pure noise, but not techno. i just pointed out that schranz wouldn't be the best description of such a genre. besides, industrial does not necessarily imply hard. just because schranz is all fast 'n distorted doesn't mean it's 'industrial'. the word is awfully overused nowadays.

hahaha yayyy lets have an eliteist argument lol. i never sed it was industrial... i know damn right what that is... i sed it was industriOUS

and besides i wouldnt consider schranz to be fast, its the hectic kaos pad effect that give schranz a somewhat industrious effect... and a constant grinding, which is another thing i percieve to be industrialistikerismisations

Posted by Noisician on Jun-07-2004 21:42:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: schranz? .... nein oder ja ?

quote:
Originally posted by [N]�k|��[Z]
i never sed it was industrial... i know damn right what that is... i sed it was industriOUS

erm okay. so then... what the hell is that supposed to mean, exactly? i'd rather that you said "industrial". would've made more sense. because according to my dictionary

in�dus�tri�ous adj. = diligent; hard-working.

that doesn't sound right, now does it?

or maybe you did mean 'industrial' after all?

Posted by Ste on Jun-07-2004 21:46:

ive always prefered shranz techno to normal "gayified" funky techno. but i admit quite a lot of it can be very shit.

the more complicated and the not-5-mins-of-150bpm-drums-and-percs stuff is good.

Posted by [N]�k|��[Z] on Jun-07-2004 21:56:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: schranz? .... nein oder ja ?

quote:
Originally posted by Noisician
erm okay. so then... what the hell is that supposed to mean, exactly? i'd rather that you said "industrial". would've made more sense. because according to my dictionary

in�dus�tri�ous adj. = diligent; hard-working.

that doesn't sound right, now does it?

or maybe you did mean 'industrial' after all?

LOL dont make me post the udders again mister!

naw i mean industrious as in industrial sounding, industrious as in could be mistaken for being industrial due to the frantic percs that schranz promotes

bastard

Posted by Noisician on Jun-07-2004 22:16:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: schranz? .... nein oder ja ?

quote:
Originally posted by [N]�k|��[Z]
bastard

why hello there, pretty lady

Posted by [N]�k|��[Z] on Jun-07-2004 22:36:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: schranz? .... nein oder ja ?

quote:
Originally posted by Noisician
why hello there, pretty lady

awww come here you

Posted by Noisician on Jun-07-2004 22:42:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: schranz? .... nein oder ja ?

quote:
Originally posted by [N]�k|��[Z]
awww come here you

fuck off, jay. i'm not gay

Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »