TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Gaming Forum
-- WTF? Driver 3 one of the most talk about game, gets a 5.4 score from IGN and GAMESPOT

WTF? Driver 3 one of the most talk about game, gets a 5.4 score from IGN and GAMESPOT

that sucks. was interested in this game. botht the buttbox and ps2 version sucks ass. maybe the pc is good. but they said the whole game was shallow.

go to ign or gamespot.com

LINK OR SHUT THE FUCK UP MOTHER FUCKING DICKSUCKING HOMOS!!!!!!!

Another good example of a bad game that is hyped up for years.

Dammit, that sucks. I saw it being shown in the local games shop the other day looked very similar to vice city. Even by the way the main charactor steals cars.

I think D3 is overhyped aswell and to me it looks like D2 with crispier graphics. The cars seem to move around in the same way and the streets still feel rather empty.

Again:
GTA,GTA & Only GTA!!!!!!!!!

To think that Atari had the nerve to laugh at Rockstar ( http://img47.photobucket.com/albums.../MiamiTimmy.jpg theyre called miami timmi or some shit,you need to shoot them to get a weapon,he have the swimming things to laugh at the fact that tanner can swim and tommy cant).
and of course we all remmember Activision calling Rockstar "Jokestar" on Streets of LA,real funny.

They can talk the talk but they can't walk the walk.

Just because a game is really hyped up does not necessarily mean its good.

quote:

Originally posted by Viber To think that Atari had the nerve to laugh at Rockstar ( http://img47.photobucket.com/albums.../MiamiTimmy.jpg

Rockstar did the same thing in gta 3. U had to kill a guy called tanner (who was "useless out of his car") for kenji.

i liked the original driver's. i dont think they ripped off GTA too much. i love GTA but they need to let it die

quote:

Originally posted by nova2wl i love GTA but they need to let it die

Then you don't love it at all imo.

NFSU was overhyped, and it turned out to be a pretty shitty game.

quote:

Originally posted by DJ-Fuq Rockstar did the same thing in gta 3. U had to kill a guy called tanner (who was "useless out of his car") for kenji.

Yea i didnt know that cuz i quited around Kenji'S missions(and i didnt know who the fuck is tannar either).
now im starting GTA3 again i will spot it

and Rockstar can afford to laugh at every game in the market today,theyre better then any stinkin Atari ,Activision and other friends.

quote:

Originally posted by Dark Apostle Then you don't love it at all imo.

not really because i dont want to see it get played out then have it flop

quote:

Originally posted by Matt NFSU was overhyped, and it turned out to be a pretty shitty game.

I don't think it was that bad of a game. Sure it wasn't as deep as Gran Turismo, but it was fun and the drift & drag modes brought a fairly new idea to the table.

quote:

Originally posted by nova2wl not really because i dont want to see it get played out then have it flop

Basicly GTA is re-using it main priciple over and over. It's only the theme that changes and especialy the tongue-in-cheek referals to other games, politics, gameshows, movies and songs or music styles.
That's why the concept of GTA can be (ab-)used for a very long time.

GTA is part game, part parody, part some statement against somethings. Games like Driv3r just fail to deliver the last 2. Rockstar is the only (or at least one of the few) that can make something completely and utterly slapstick without making it rediculous.
Other game developers know this and they kinda hate Rockstar for doing it the first.

Driv3r it's main weakness is it's difference to GTA, it's a bit more serious and realistic. If GTA:SA turns out to have lost its humor...then we can say goodbye old friend, but looking at rockstar, I know they have still some tricks up their sleeves.

Driv3r has also been postphoned waaaaaaaaaay to long, so it needs to be hyped in order to get sold. Because with tons of driving games on the horizon and the near cult-phenomenon of GTA Driv3r has some pretty tough competition.

quote:

Originally posted by Dark Apostle Basicly GTA is re-using it main priciple over and over. It's only the theme that changes and especialy the tongue-in-cheek referals to other games, politics, gameshows, movies and songs or music styles. That's why the concept of GTA can be (ab-)used for a very long time. GTA is part game, part parody, part some statement against somethings. Games like Driv3r just fail to deliver the last 2. Rockstar is the only (or at least one of the few) that can make something completely and utterly slapstick without making it rediculous. Other game developers know this and they kinda hate Rockstar for doing it the first. Driv3r it's main weakness is it's difference to GTA, it's a bit more serious and realistic. If GTA:SA turns out to have lost its humor...then we can say goodbye old friend, but looking at rockstar, I know they have still some tricks up their sleeves. Driv3r has also been postphoned waaaaaaaaaay to long, so it needs to be hyped in order to get sold. Because with tons of driving games on the horizon and the near cult-phenomenon of GTA Driv3r has some pretty tough competition.

yeah i agree. especially the humor part. rockstar mixes the humor/seriousness well. and if the game still offers a player to kill thousands of people then someone will buy it hehe

first of all i think D3 sux donkey balls, the most important part imo driving cars is so bad, cars are fuckin hard to control and somehow they lost the touch d1 and d2 had

imo a 5.4 is overrated

LoL!!!!
ive just did the "2 faced tanner" mission on GTA3,"appearently he is a strangly animated man who work undercover"... ,"he is completly useless out of his car so we put a tracer on it"...

heh,you gotta love this game war

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.