Was Man Really on the Moon????????????????

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Was Man Really on the Moon????????????????

Posted by DJ Firestarter on Sep-15-2001 09:23:

Was Man Really on the Moon????????????????

I saw a TV program the other day and it was saying man was never on the moon.It was all a Hoax.
It gave this evadance
WHY WAS THE AMERICAN FLAG BLOWING WHEN THERE IS NO WIND ON THE MOON

IF THEY REALLY WENT THEY WAULD HAVE BEEN BURNED BY THE RADIASION LIKE WHAT HAPPENED TO RUSSIANS IN 1970 WHEN THEY TRIED TO GO TO THE MOON

WHEN ARMSTRONG TAKES HIS FIRST STEPS ON MOON (STUDIO FLOOR) THERE IS ALLREADY A CAMARA ON THE MOON

Posted by Coup on Sep-15-2001 09:25:

woulnd't suprise me, but the camera thingy, the shot is being filmed from inside the shuttle so the cam would of been inside the shuttle or on one of the other guys space suits, so thats ones out
ps. what day/channel/prog name and ill look out for the repeat

Posted by Renegade on Sep-15-2001 10:59:

Erm, the American flag isn't flapping in the breeze, it's supported by a horizontal metal rod, and it surely wouldn't be that difficult to attach a camera to the outside of the spacecraft to take the pictures.

Please stop with all this consipiracy bullshit, it's really starting to annoy me.

Posted by Renegade on Sep-15-2001 11:00:

Oh, and correct me if I'm wrong, but the Russians never even made an attempt to get to the moon.

Posted by Renegade on Sep-15-2001 11:35:

The flag isn't moving, buddy.

Even if it were filmed in a studio, where would the wind have come from? Why would it be moving in a sealed room?

Posted by DJ Firestarter on Sep-15-2001 15:05:

The camera was allready on the ground when the they first went on the moon.You cauld see the whole spaceship.The Russians tried to go to the moon and had to turn back because of radiation.

Posted by Viceroy on Sep-15-2001 15:13:

Conspiracy Theories!

Even though a lot of this does sound convincing....it's just like anything else...people trying to take away what good others have done.

It's quite possible that the first mission to the moon was a hoax, because we Americans felt that the Russians were gaining too much ground with space exploration. It certainly could have been a staged event to make Americans feel proud that we too have gone to space and back.

But the missions today are definitely not hoax's.

Posted by Dj Lex on Sep-15-2001 15:45:

Haha this is funny!!!

But I don't think you are right. I think the Americans were the first on the moon. That is just how it is and don't come with those programs, coz they are just faking, so people are worrying for nothing.

Posted by Flippe on Sep-15-2001 16:31:

Don't believe this.

Just some people that wants to make other people think about it

Posted by Viceroy on Sep-15-2001 16:40:

http://batesmotel.8m.com/

Posted by thesuperfunk on Sep-15-2001 17:01:

quote:
Originally posted by Viceroy

It's quite possible that the first mission to the moon was a hoax

But the missions today are definitely not hoax's.

Agreed!

Posted by AnotherWay83 on Sep-15-2001 19:54:

we did go to the moon...a while back i asked my physics teacher all of these questions and he said the evidence that these ppl. are putting forth to prove their claims that we never went to the moon are actually proving just the opposite--that we DID...he explained everything to me in terms of physics and stuff and said that the conditions recorded could ONLY have existed on the moon...no way we could've replicated them here on earth...i dont remember his explanations, its been a few yrs. now since then, but they made total sense to me then, im sure he was rite..

peace

Posted by Viceroy on Sep-15-2001 20:23:

TD, pull the rod outta your ass. That comment was uncalled for. You brought your arguments to this discussion, and so did Anotherway. If you can't respect that then leave.

Steve

Posted by AnotherWay83 on Sep-15-2001 20:23:

ha...btw, which "experts" say that we did NOT go to the moon??

for every "expert" that says we did not, theres two or three that say we DID...

yo viceroy..thanks d00d!

peace

Posted by Viceroy on Sep-15-2001 20:32:

No problem AW.

I agree with your comment as well...and usually those that offer a "expert" opinion back are nothing but experts, rather they are people that have nothing else to do but look for faults in others achievements.

I'm outta here!! (WORK) WOOHOO! Later everyone...

Steve

Posted by XxClayxX on Sep-15-2001 20:35:

Is it just me or is there a fight in just about every thread on this board?

Its really starting to get annoying

Posted by AnotherWay83 on Sep-15-2001 21:30:

nah..theres no fite...TD...d00d, u can have ur own views, i'll have mine...

nothing more to say

peace

Posted by Dj Lex on Sep-15-2001 23:04:

No, but on those videos you see how the gravity is. Now they can make those special effects with gravity, but in that time not.

Posted by Sir. Lunchalot on Sep-16-2001 01:57:

Just wanted to say that the moving flag makes perfect sense and a non moving flag would make me believe that we (mankind) have not landed on the moon.

There is atmosphere on the moon (if not then the astronauts wouldn`t have jumped but flew on the moon), it`s just thinner than on earth, that`s why there`s also wind. If there would be no atmosphere then the moon wouldn`t be rotating around eath so that`s why the flag hast to move. If the flag hadn`t moved back then I would have tought it to be a hoax.

Posted by Renegade on Sep-16-2001 05:39:

quote:
There is atmosphere on the moon (if not then the astronauts wouldn`t have jumped but flew on the moon), it`s just thinner than on earth, that`s why there`s also wind.

Well actually, there isn't any atmosphere on the moon.

And I guess that these points would go some way to proving that man landed on the moon:

Like someone said before, it would be very hard to fake the moons gravity in a studio back in 1969.
The astronauts were launched into space (everyone saw the rocket depart) and we all saw them return again, how would they have had the opportunity to go to a studio and back in that time?
The astronauts returned with pieces of rock some 4.5 billion years old or more, almost a billion years older than any rock found on Earth.

Bah.

Posted by plastikE on Sep-16-2001 06:01:

honestly, this is just going wayyyy over board. No moon-landing? lol! what's next, DJ Tiesto is a clone???!? hahha, alright sorry bout that, i just think its ridiculous with things people come up with these days

Posted by Phrozen on Sep-16-2001 11:39:

See lot of talking about jamming rods up asses...

*Slowly walks out of thread*

-Hmm saw that program some time ago...really makes u think

Posted by SmackdowN on Sep-17-2001 07:16:

Actually when you speed up the moonwalk it just turns into a kind of trot that the astronauts would have to do in those suits on earth . I am convinced that the moon landing was fake. The evidence in support of it being phony is way greater than any evidence that it was real. If you would see the program about it on tv I'm sure a lot of your minds would change. But each to their own i guess - if it helps you sleep better at night thinking it was real then so be it.