TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- michael moore on Bill o'reilly


Posted by Krypton on Jul-28-2004 01:34:

michael moore on Bill o'reilly

who watched it??

moore did have a point at one time about soldiers dying believing their cause was WMD's, when it really wasnt. but the rest went to bill.


Posted by icyhandofcrap on Jul-28-2004 05:38:

no, i didnt watch it, but the transcript is on drudge

heh.. they got nowhere, but at least they did it in an interesting fashion.


Posted by arctic on Jul-28-2004 10:54:

quote:
Originally posted by icyhandofcrap
no, i didnt watch it, but the transcript is on drudge

heh.. they got nowhere, but at least they did it in an interesting fashion.

From the little I've seen of O'Reilly, I've come to the conclusion that it simply isn't possible for anyone who disagrees with him to on anything to get anywhere at all, period. He's a proven liar, he's abusive, and he's consistently irrational.


Posted by NeoPhono on Jul-28-2004 10:55:

quote:
Originally posted by arctic
He's a proven liar, he's abusive, and he's consistently irrational.


Are you talking about O'Reilly or Moore here?


Posted by arctic on Jul-28-2004 11:03:

quote:
Originally posted by NeoPhono
Are you talking about O'Reilly or Moore here?

Well, from the little I've seen of O'Reilly I'd say that he's worse than Moore. I agree that Moore too engages in some dubious comment (and this is coming from someone further to the left than he is), and I don't always agree with him. I did enjoy Roger & Me, and the Big One was a good film as well. I also thought that Bowling For Columbine was a fantastic film in some respects, I agreed with Moore in general -- but I did get irritated at his selective editing and some of the antics that he employed.

I often find myself in general agreement with Moore's central case/overall point, but i don't always like the way he presents it. To sum up, I both agree and disagree with him now and then. So yeah, I suppose what I said could be applied to both of them, but to different extents.


Posted by speedracer_mec on Aug-02-2004 22:05:

quote:
Originally posted by arctic
Well, from the little I've seen of O'Reilly I'd say that he's worse than Moore. I agree that Moore too engages in some dubious comment (and this is coming from someone further to the left than he is), and I don't always agree with him. I did enjoy Roger & Me, and the Big One was a good film as well. I also thought that Bowling For Columbine was a fantastic film in some respects, I agreed with Moore in general -- but I did get irritated at his selective editing and some of the antics that he employed.

I often find myself in general agreement with Moore's central case/overall point, but i don't always like the way he presents it. To sum up, I both agree and disagree with him now and then. So yeah, I suppose what I said could be applied to both of them, but to different extents.


LINK

He loves YOU


Posted by rizo on Aug-04-2004 15:15:

quote:
Originally posted by speedracer_mec
LINK

He loves YOU
Thanks for reminding me why I like Micheal Moore


Posted by nic01445 on Aug-05-2004 01:20:

quote:
Originally posted by speedracer_mec
LINK

He loves YOU


I don't get it.


Posted by Shakka on Aug-05-2004 02:42:

Either does your mother


Posted by 3xx3r7 on Aug-05-2004 02:51:

Neither do I. Pathetic attempt to discredit someone.


Posted by nic01445 on Aug-05-2004 18:03:

quote:
Originally posted by Shakka
Either does your mother


Your mom got it...in the face! LAST NIGHT!


Posted by Shakka on Aug-05-2004 18:33:

quote:
Originally posted by nic01445
Your mom got it...in the face! LAST NIGHT!


ZING! I love it.

Sorry--I was wasted when I wrote that and for no reason at all!



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.