TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- EQ/Compressor


Posted by tupsox on Aug-09-2004 16:39:

EQ/Compressor

While mixing for the final master, is there a generally accepted technique as to whether you EQ before Compressing each track, or vice versa?

I'm kind of sloppy in this regard...which comes first, or does it not matter that much? Should you just follow your ears?


Posted by alanzo on Aug-09-2004 19:09:

EQ should be the very last thing u apply


Posted by Vizay on Aug-09-2004 21:30:

there's generally no rights or wrongs when it comes to this matter...

what you should keep in mind is that if you apply the EQ before the compressor and change any parameters on the EQ you'll have to doublecheck the compressor and prolly redo the setting for it since the signal will be diferent than before


Posted by Sebraa on Aug-10-2004 12:50:

If you compress(maximize) and then add EQ without LIMITER then CLIPPING 100%!!


Posted by Vizay on Aug-10-2004 13:15:

quote:
Originally posted by Sebraa
If you compress(maximize) and then add EQ without LIMITER then CLIPPING 100%!!


compressing and maximizing is not the same thing...you can maximize something with a compressor but that's not it's main use...

I suggest you read up a little more on compressors if you have that problem with clipping after compressing


Posted by Massive84 on Aug-10-2004 14:14:

EQ is my best friend,

compressor i never use.


Posted by alanzo on Aug-10-2004 17:48:

quote:
Originally posted by Massive84
compressor i never use.



you must be nuts! i compress nearly everything.. filo and peri gave a tip on here about making sure you compress your leads which is true... compressing your leads, pads, basses, etc etc makes the volume level throughout the instrument consistent..


Posted by SgtFoo on Aug-10-2004 17:52:

quote:
Originally posted by alanzo
EQ should be the very last thing u apply


i don't mean to sound like i'm attackign you, but i'm attacking what you said....... no offense or anything...

IN TERMS OF FINAL MIX, ALWAYS MAKE SURE THE COMPRESSION HAPPENS LAST!!
EQ AFTER COMPRESSION WILL CREATE CLIPPING AND DISTORTION!!!!!!!!!


Posted by breakaholic on Aug-10-2004 19:56:

I also try to avoid compressor as much as possible while mixing. I might compress some parts of drums but definitely not all of'em, I hardly ever compress basslines either (eventhough you can get very good results compressing kick and bassline). Compressing everything just makes the track loosing it's natural sound, my tip is to use eq to fix sound instead of compressing. Sure the compressor is handy if the levels are "jumping" too much when recording. I use a light/moderate compression on mastering stage if needed.


Posted by alanzo on Aug-10-2004 21:23:

quote:
Originally posted by SgtFoo
IN TERMS OF FINAL MIX, ALWAYS MAKE SURE THE COMPRESSION HAPPENS LAST!!
EQ AFTER COMPRESSION WILL CREATE CLIPPING AND DISTORTION!!!!!!!!!


is compressing the final mix a good idea? I tend to just limit/Nor..umm.. I mean.. increase the volume to maximum


I suppose that EQing after compressing will create distortion if you increase frequencies which you should do your best to avoid anyway... always decrease instead of increasing (to boost treble, decrease bass)


Posted by SgtFoo on Aug-11-2004 06:17:

When I say compress the final mix, that could be just compression, or the extreme of compression, being limiting. It all depends on what amount of mastering needs to be done to the final mix.

Anything done to the entire final mix of the track (usually over just the stereo mix) is considered mastering. compression and limiting is used most often on pretty much everything that gets released, to some extent.

I've spoken to mastering engineers, and they've mentionned how LOUD and hard-limited the newest Linkin Park album is. It's waveforms are almost perfect rectangular blocks!... but it just goes to show that limiting or compression is what's necessary as the LAST thing you do to the final mix to give it the pro-sound we all seek.

(ppssst!...btw alanzo: NO NORMALIZING!.. YOU NAUGHTY BOY YOU!)


Posted by Timothy on Aug-11-2004 07:56:

Re: EQ/Compressor

quote:
Originally posted by tupsox
While mixing for the final master, is there a generally accepted technique as to whether you EQ before Compressing each track, or vice versa?

I'm kind of sloppy in this regard...which comes first, or does it not matter that much? Should you just follow your ears?


Just use your ears and do what you think is best


Posted by Sebraa on Aug-11-2004 08:42:

quote:
Originally posted by Vizay
compressing and maximizing is not the same thing...you can maximize something with a compressor but that's not it's main use...

I suggest you read up a little more on compressors if you have that problem with clipping after compressing


I read the original topic wrongly
"While mixing for the final master ... "

I thought -> what you do with you final mixdown.... giving final touch! My bad .. dont need read about compression basics. Advanced reading -> OK


Posted by Vizay on Aug-11-2004 19:20:

sebraa: my intention wasn't to make you look like a newbie to the subject, my apologies for that

well anyway, it seems like some of the people here in the thread are talking about EQing and compressing in the mastering process and some are talking about EQing and compressing on single instruments in the mixing process

well just some general guidelines(no rights or wrongs really as long as the final result is good)

Mixing: a good tip is to compress all the instruments in the mix, we're mostly not talking about much compression here...just a tad on every instrument to make shure you don't get any nasty peaks anywhere and to make it more level

mastering: what you do before the limiter is totally up to you but always put the limiter last, if you EQ after limiting the clipping will probably go wild on ya (this even goes for equalizers that decrease something. it's been proved that even if you decrease with a EQ it can still increase frequencies and so on)


Posted by tupsox on Aug-19-2004 20:14:

quote:
Originally posted by Vizay
sebraa: my intention wasn't to make you look like a newbie to the subject, my apologies for that

well anyway, it seems like some of the people here in the thread are talking about EQing and compressing in the mastering process and some are talking about EQing and compressing on single instruments in the mixing process

well just some general guidelines(no rights or wrongs really as long as the final result is good)

Mixing: a good tip is to compress all the instruments in the mix, we're mostly not talking about much compression here...just a tad on every instrument to make shure you don't get any nasty peaks anywhere and to make it more level

mastering: what you do before the limiter is totally up to you but always put the limiter last, if you EQ after limiting the clipping will probably go wild on ya (this even goes for equalizers that decrease something. it's been proved that even if you decrease with a EQ it can still increase frequencies and so on)


Sounds like the signal chain, in general then, in order:

Each track: Misc FX as needed->Compressor->EQ

Final Mix: EQ->Compressor->Limiter

I've noticed most "mastering suites" have a signal chain of EQ->Compressor->Limiter so I assume this is "proper" technique.

Is this correct?


Posted by Alan Nimmo on Aug-19-2004 23:21:

quote:
Originally posted by alanzo
EQ should be the very last thing u apply


thats actually wrong mate, the chain is:-

EQ then COMPRESSION then LIMIT

For some reason i always thought 'eckle' to myself everytime i worked on a track and it stuck lol

Alan

www.signalrunners.com



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.