TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Hold on to your wallets! McGuinty bringing back photo radar!
Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Hold on to your wallets! McGuinty bringing back photo radar!

Just remember...

I DIDNT VOTE FOR THIS IDIOT (thank god!)

quote:

There are several two word phrases almost every voter in the province has come to hate. Health Premiums. Tax Hikes. Broken Promises. And now you can add one more � Photo Radar. Several G.T.A. municipalities are urging Queen�s Park to give them permission to bring back the technology. �We could ... put in speed bumps � and it will cost a lot of money,� warns Mississauga Mayor Hazel McCallion, who�s spearheading the movement. �We can hire more policemen, which is not acceptable. The only answer is photo radar.� Ontario Transport Minister Harinder Takhar assured residents on Tuesday there were no plans to return the hated speed traps, during an announcement about the expansion of red light cameras. But his boss is now singing a different tune. �I'm not ruling it out,� admits Premier Dalton McGuinty. �It's about safety. Maybe the red light cameras are going to be unpopular. But don't we have a shared responsibility to protect lives?� Still, he�s waiting to hear from the cities before agreeing to anything. �Nobody has made any kind of formal proposal to us. Until such time, I'm not giving it any thought.� Mayor David Miller concedes he�s not against the concept. �In places like around schools or community safety zones or the places in the city where [there's] the most problem with speeding � it's a useful supplement,� he muses. �But you know, I think the province should allow municipalities to choose.� The unmanned vans snap pictures of drivers as they rush along local highways and streets, then send offenders a ticket in the mail. But infuriated voters called it nothing but a cash grab, noting when it was introduced by the Rae government in 1994, 224,000 tickets were issued, netting the province $16 million. It was scrapped when the Tories came to power. Photo radar remains a staple of the roads in Manitoba and Alberta, but B.C. discarded the program three years ago. .

And even worse, it wont just be on freeways like before. It will be EVERYWHERE

What a fuckin HOMO

good. too many people drive over speed limit in this city. I hate when I see cars roaring through residential sidestreets at 80km/h. I've had a few friends in car accidents in the last 3 or 4 years and all of them included either them or the other car involved speeding. Jay, you have to realize that if people in this world are given too much freedom they will fuck it up!

this isn't the best method of doing this...it's kinda sneaky. but imo something has to be done about speeders. You could always do what a friend of mine did...he got his liscence plate to be all zero's and D's....you can't tell what are d's and what are 0's

Well what happened last time was that people would still speed and slam on the brakes everytime they saw something on the side of the road. Thats safe isnt it?

Sorry but this is a cash grab and nothing more. Want to make things safer? Have real cops enforcing the laws and make speed limits reflect the road conditions. I find that all too often, speed limits in southern ontario are artificially low. Its one of the best kept corruption secrets in Canada in my eyes.

quote:

Originally posted by Elmo-On-XTC good. too many people drive over speed limit in this city. I hate when I see cars roaring through residential sidestreets at 80km/h.

You wont see em on residential streets.. But i do agree with you too many people speed in residential areas.

I personally beleive that they only care about generating another source of revenue... If it did make roads soo much safer before, what did they abandon it? IMO money is the issue here, safety is just a way for them to justify it.

quote:

Originally posted by Jayx1 Well what happened last time was that people would still speed and slam on the brakes everytime they saw something on the side of the road. Thats safe isnt it? Sorry but this is a cash grab and nothing more. Want to make things safer? Have real cops enforcing the laws and make speed limits reflect the road conditions. I find that all too often, speed limits in southern ontario are artificially low. Its one of the best kept corruption secrets in Canada in my eyes.

it's not safe if you don't see something coming (c'mon theres tons of dumb kids running around ). I don't care if someone is breaking the law if they are affecting themselves only...but when you're breaking a law that endangers others people i hope they fry.

i believe speed limits in the US are lower (i could be wrong...my conversion skills are crap). You said in another post you wish people weren't in such a rush with their lives!...why would you want to speed if you weren't in a rush?

I agree with you on some points J, but @ the same time I'd rather more cops be dedicated to hard crime than bothering with traffic issues.

One thing that angers me is that if that indeed happens, it's going to be about the money, and NOT about safety.

Personally, I would simply increase fines/demerit points for speeding, and leave everything else as is.

quote:

Originally posted by Elmo-On-XTC it's not safe if you don't see something coming (c'mon theres tons of dumb kids running around ). I don't care if someone is breaking the law if they are affecting themselves only...but when you're breaking a law that endangers others people i hope they fry. i believe speed limits in the US are lower (i could be wrong...my conversion skills are crap). You said in another post you wish people weren't in such a rush with their lives!...why would you want to speed if you weren't in a rush?

speed limit on freeways in the US is 65 Mph in some states (105 km/h) and 70 - 75 in many other states (110-116 km/h)


Yes people should slow down a bit but NOT ON THE FREAKING ROADS! Even in the most laid back countries people drive like a bat out of hell. Thats a fact!

quote:

Originally posted by Jayx1 speed limit on freeways in the US is 65 Mph in some states (105 km/h) and 70 - 75 in many other states (110-116 km/h) Yes people should slow down a bit but NOT ON THE FREAKING ROADS! Even in the most laid back countries people drive like a bat out of hell. Thats a fact!

oh. i thought it was 50mph for some reason. Personally I think 60km/h on roads and 100km/h (which is usually 120km/h if you don't want to get "fuck you'd" by everyone...but I won't be the one to set that pace) on the highways are perfectly fine. I agree it is a sneaky move by the gov't, but as stated I'd rather the police deal with other stuff than traffic. (we all know traffic cops are a bitch ;p)

speed limit on most freeways should be 120 and on most 2 lane highways 90. Many 4 lane highways within city limits could easily get away with 70 or 80 limit such as hwy 7 in brampton etc.

ontario roads are damaged, you can't speed like you can on the I95, that's a sweet ass highway. good quality.

and if they want to put camera's in school zone where you are supposed to majorly slow down, for a good reason, then they should. and you really think the photo radar is going to be set to the actual speed limit? It's not like you step over the speed 1 km and will get nabbed. it will be set for major speeding like over 115 on on the highway.

there is photo radar in quebec, and it works alright, haven't ever gotten a speeding ticket and have went over the speed limit there.

under the NDP, people were getting nailed for 104.

And you are right, they should upgrade streches of ontario highway. But, most people go 120 as it is and ontario highways are among the safest in the world.

Elmo-on-XTC, do you actually drive? Because honestly you're posting some extremely ignorant comments here.

Photo-radar may take some weight off the shoulders of the police but the problem is it won't make people slow down! How could it possibly succeed in doing that if people don't know where they'll have to slow down? Photo-radar is, was, and always will be an "undercover" way of dealing with speeders. Slapping people with a fine 2 or 3 weeks or more after the incident - how does that accomplish anything in terms of safety? It's meant to CATCH people, but not to DETER them which is the real aim when you're talking about SAFETY. It's simply a cash grab and nothing more - another tax on drivers who already have to pay SO MUCH for their privilege.

Not to mention that courts everywhere have ruled that it is blatantly unconstitutional to lay a charge on someone with no human witness, just a photo and a number as evidence, 3 weeks after the incident occurred when it is nearly impossible for any reasonable person to remember precisely what happened on that time & day. AND ALSO not to mention that there is no law requiring people to open their mail, which makes it a violation of people's civil rights to issue a conviction on them when they might not have even known that there was a charge standing (what if the mail never got delivered?).

There's not even any guarantee that the photo radar is working properly, because they don't turn them off in heavy rain or fog when it is WELL KNOWN that radar cannot function normally by sheer scientific principle. Radar law states that the device is supposed to be tested and calibrated BEFORE AND AFTER EVERY TICKET IS ISSUED - with photo radar that is hardly done at all, maybe a calibration once in the morning and sometimes not even that.

If they do bring this bullshit back, I sincerely hope that the same lobby group that crushed photo-radar last time will go forward this time with its class-action suit and expose this "safety" fraud for what it really is. The government has NO right to tax people arbitrarily like that. If the provincial government has proven one thing to us about road safety, it's that they don't understand ANYTHING about it!

Fortunately, these ramblings about bringing photo radar back have been going on for a while with no progress, so this news isn't really that new. Sounds like the cities are really pushing it though - I'll bet that fucking Peel municipality is one of them, they're the same people that spend billions of dollars on marauders for the police force and military-grade radar technology. Sure, sex offenders are still running loose but at least the traffic cops have EVEN MORE cushy jobs!

Mcguinty has been a huge disgrace to ontario. Sadly we have to put up with this weasel for at least 4 more years.

I dont know if my wallet will survive the lieberals

photo radar may be really annoying and all the stuff aaron said is true but i think it might at least get some people to slow down. that and a lot of nagging wives.

i agree 100 percent to place photo cameras in school zones not on the highways tho. If people are going 150-160 on the highway they should be busted by a huge mother fucking cop and dealt with properly!

they better not put them on the 407!!!

quote:

Originally posted by StereoPrincess photo radar may be really annoying and all the stuff aaron said is true but i think it might at least get some people to slow down. that and a lot of nagging wives. i agree 100 percent to place photo cameras in school zones not on the highways tho. If people are going 150-160 on the highway they should be busted by a huge mother fucking cop and dealt with properly!

Getting people to slow down isn't always desirable though. As Jay mentioned, sometimes you get the morons slamming on the brakes every time they see something on the side of the road. And I can think of several instances where I've been on the 401 and some tasteless sadist is driving a white Chevy Impala - suddenly the traffic everywhere slows down to 80 - and when somebody in the left lane suddenly drops to 80 when the guy behind him is going 115 (which is a perfectly reasonably speed), you could be looking at a serious accident!

Cameras put people into "panic mode" - even moreso than a speed trap does, because at least with a speed trap you know instantly whether you got busted or not. And when people panic on the road, the results are generally not good. You end up with traffic jams and "near misses" at best - at worst, you might end up with people driving WAY too slow, not paying attention, and getting into accidents.

Speeding isn't always *dangerous* - photo radar doesn't discriminate, but cops do (unless they're being jerks). If a cop sees someone going 125 passing a car going 115 they usually won't do anything. But if they see someone going 120, weaving in and out of traffic in a bottleneck where everyone is going 70, then they are definitely going to get busted. People can drive fast and safely or they can drive slow and dangerously. Speed alone is only half the problem, with the other half being traffic conditions. If you have too many people driving too slow, or worrying more about getting their picture taken than concentrating on the road, you're creating very dangerous conditions.

When it comes to school zones, I can agree with you Margs - but only if they set reasonable limits. That is, say, for people going 70, not 50 (on a 40 road), and also having a big sign right above the speed limit sign which says point-blank that the area is monitored by photo-radar. I can only support this if it is made absolutely clear that the intent is not to catch speeders but to stop them from driving too fast.


EDIT: believe it or not, the most effective form of speed control I have seen so far are those massive signs on the 401 near Napanee/Kingston that list the fine amounts ($100 for 120, $350 for 140, etc.). I almost never see anyone going above 120 on those stretches, even though I've never seen anyone get pulled over there either. It really just goes to show you that tickets work much better as a deterrent than a punishment.

arg - would somebody please smack this man...

quote:

Several G.T.A. municipalities are urging Queen�s Park to give them permission to bring back the technology. �We could ... put in speed bumps � and it will cost a lot of money,� warns Mississauga Mayor Hazel McCallion, who�s spearheading the movement. �We can hire more policemen, which is not acceptable. The only answer is photo radar.�

The best answer is to fix the god damned streets so that traffic can actually flow.

Instead of trying to make people stop at every god damn post for a piss, they should let traffic flow so people don't get frustrated.

Just let people drive!!!

...and then the wonder why people get into accidents. It's because they get fed up with waiting every 15 feet for the light to change.

speed bumps > photo radar

quote:

Originally posted by DigiNut Elmo-on-XTC, do you actually drive? Because honestly you're posting some extremely ignorant comments here.

oh shit..your right I knew I forgot something (yes I drive, thank you)
you make some good points though.

quote:

Originally posted by dEsidEL speed bumps > photo radar

Seriously. You want to see a city that has actually thought this through and done its homework, check out Portland: http://www.trans.ci.portland.or.us/.../streamline.htm

That's how it SHOULD be done. If speeding is a problem, first they send in a few traffic cops. If it's still a problem, then the street has to go through an entire system of regulations and points to determine whether or not they can start annoying people with speed bumps.

quote:

The street surface must be to current City standards, and maintained by the City. Traffic speeds must generally be at least 5 mph over the posted speed limit. Traffic volumes must be between 400 and 2,000 vehicles per day. The street must meet design requirements for installing speed bumps.

They have to be careful though, because speed bumps can interfere with emergency response. That's why the city has a classification system and any street that is designated as an ER route cannot have speed bumps, ever.

Too bad it's only about money and complaining over here. Even speed bumps have their problems but at least they actually work.

If it means less speed traps I'm all for it. At least it's only a fine and nothing against your Insurance/Demerit points.

spike strips might even work better

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.