Thrillseekers - Synasthesia 2004 (Project Seven Remix) [192-FULL-FAST-DL]

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Producers Promotion
-- Thrillseekers - Synasthesia 2004 (Project Seven Remix) [192-FULL-FAST-DL]

Posted by Subtle on Aug-17-2004 18:56:

Thrillseekers - Synasthesia 2004 (Project Seven Remix) [192-FULL-FAST-DL]

My newest Cubase & Reason made remix, I decided to finish this one afterall..

Artist: Thrillseekers
Track: Synasthesia
Remix: Subtle
Style: Trance
Lenght: 8:46
Bitrate: 192 kbps
BPM: 140

link:

Thrillseekers - Synasthesia (Project Seven Remix)

for FAST download speed:

FAST DOWNLOAD (click the link and click "music")

what do u think of it?

Posted by [mart] on Aug-17-2004 19:56:

You've got to be brave to remix a trance classic as huge as Synaesthesia, which is why I've always avoided it. Still, I'm not one to hold prejudice so here goes with my thoughts:

I wasn't really feeling this at all to begin with, though things did pick up a bit from the breakdown onwards. There are two main things I'm not a fan of; the white noise sweepy thing and the peculiar jolly ghost noise that appears around 1m08s. Overall the remix is alright, but it doesn't bring anything new to the table and there are a few production nuances here and there.

Hopefully you'll be able to squeeze something helpful out of that! Keep at it!

Posted by Subtle on Aug-17-2004 23:36:

thx alot for the comment, appreciate it.. I tried to make something new... hence the "ghost noise"... atleast I am the only one actually making my own synth in this remix.. seems like both Ferry and Pulser.. used the synth from the original track..

Posted by Subtle on Aug-18-2004 15:53:

Damn

look at this topic:

http://trance.nu/v3/forum_viewtopic...c=93490&forum=2

I really made a fool of myself

Posted by Timothy on Aug-18-2004 16:42:

It's not as good as Pulser's remix of this track , but it's really nice anyway.

Posted by Thunder5 on Aug-18-2004 18:40:

wOw...

This is pretty nice.

It is always nice to see people who are brave enough to remix classics such as this.

Posted by Syeker on Aug-19-2004 17:35:

Nice start, you know cool kick, hihats and clap. That windy effect drives me a bit crazy, and the ghoshly sample is kinda weird but with who cares when you have your hands in the air dancing to this one . The synth for the lead sounds cool and is more original but i find it too tick, don't know if you understand me.
Anyway is a cool remix .

Posted by InDeepSpace on Aug-19-2004 21:22:

I like this remix, very good work!!!

Posted by DJ Jim Craik on Aug-19-2004 22:39:

I like this remix mate, well done and very brave to try in the first place

Posted by Sunquest on Aug-20-2004 00:19:

first things first, to be honest, i dont like how theres all these remixes of old tracks, especially the thrillseekers, all those bullshit mixes were purely for money, no questions asked hehe

secondly, i think urs could use a little more work, just with reverb maybe? but it is really good the way it is,

thirdly, urs imo is the best mix out of all the 100 of them hehe
i love that bubble sound u got , its kewl it matches
and u gave it a classic 2000 feeling to it, real nice oldschool trance style

great remix, thanx for sharing
peace out

Posted by Digital Aura on Aug-20-2004 01:01:

Hey yeah! This IS one of the better remixes I have to say. No knocks against it Subtle! Nice work!

Posted by Peter K on Aug-20-2004 13:34:

A pretty good remix of this classic track. Doesn't compare to the almighty En Motion mix but its still very good, i'll be burning this to cd.
Btw did u use a midi or did u remake the melody/strings yourself?

Posted by Subtle on Aug-20-2004 15:55:

quote:
Originally posted by Peter K
A pretty good remix of this classic track. Doesn't compare to the almighty En Motion mix but its still very good, i'll be burning this to cd.
Btw did u use a midi or did u remake the melody/strings yourself?
Thx for all the positive feedback guys.. didnt think i`d get so much good feedback..

I made this remix using the MIDI from John Steenbergen`s MIDI site

Posted by dEEkAy on Aug-20-2004 16:24:

its a disgrace for the original , ok its not. i was too harsh

alright..some comments:
Bass sounds alright..except for the boring PvD-Offbeat Bass.
The Highs and midrange sounds are not clear at all..it's like the hihats sound like coming from a C64 or sumwhat..just pure noise. definitley need some EQing and pre-mastering.
sounds alright for the first minutes..but the Lead saw comes in way too loud..its not harmonizing at all...its like ur using a supersaw pad or something..that crap has been overused throughout the last years by every random DJ...im sure Pulsedriver, Special D or Jan Wayne would play this

good thing is the gated lead in the background although it sounds VERY standard, too. the Lead again is annoying...have u used one preset/sound/synth to create all the instruments ?

no rating from me heh and sry for being harsh

Posted by Dr. Pils on Aug-20-2004 17:28:

whoaa..this track just takes off >>>

yeah! bump!

nice.

Posted by Subtle on Aug-21-2004 18:53:

quote:
Originally posted by MatthewAdams
its a disgrace for the original
that is seriously bad

quote:
alright..some comments:
Bass sounds alright..except for the boring PvD-Offbeat Bass.
The Highs and midrange sounds are not clear at all..it's like the hihats sound like coming from a C64 or sumwhat..just pure noise. definitley need some EQing and pre-mastering.
yeah it`s a little muddy

quote:
sounds alright for the first minutes..but the Lead saw comes in way too loud..its not harmonizing at all...its like ur using a supersaw pad or something..that crap has been overused throughout the last years by every random DJ...im sure Pulsedriver, Special D or Jan Wayne would play this
I try to make my track sound like something from the past.. hence the cheesy trance supersaws and pads.. just gotta love`m.. I hope it doesnt get played by them.. atleast I am not aiming for that

quote:
good thing is the gated lead in the background although it sounds VERY standard, too. the Lead again is annoying...have u used one preset/sound/synth to create all the instruments ?
I have used four different synths to create all the leads..

I definitely arent going to ask u to listen to my previous works.. u might die

thx for the comments, nice to see people hating the track as well..

Posted by dEEkAy on Aug-21-2004 23:28:

quote:
Originally posted by Subtle
that is seriously bad

was a little harsh about that. sorry mate wasnt in a very good mood, but u should take the other hints seriously though.
i dunno what u produce with, but you could use clearer sounds and a different lead

Posted by Massive84 on Aug-22-2004 10:32:

nice kick!

that offbeat bass is really cool, pvdish.

that square acid? is really crap imo, you should replace it with something heavier or more serious.

perc seems cool.

at 0.14 you let a low noted placed synth stab a bit, make that more agressive and repeat it more each 8 or 16 bars.

1.50 that synth comes in to sudden.

2.18 this synth is not really original, try to be more creative.

break is nice, that gated synth is cool keep it, but really replace that hollow saw.

it's not bad, mixing sounds fine here as well, but that square acid in the intro should be replaced , spice up the beat and it will get to a whole different level.

if this is a disgrace i disagree.

Posted by ManTrance on Aug-22-2004 20:10:

I like this, another gr8 remix.

Everything sounds v tight and gr8 fx. I like the weird lp filtered-hoover type synth you got going on the background, v v original.

Only thing I think its missing is a big lead really.

Love all your transitions, gr8 work.

Look forward to hearing some of your other productions.

Posted by lyte on Aug-26-2004 13:12:

cool remix but too FXy