I'm testing a new server....come help me

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- I'm testing a new server....come help me
Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Posted by Swamper on Aug-31-2004 03:08:

I'm testing a new server....come help me

I know you all love to see how fast you can break TA, so, head on over to

EDIT

and do a search on something.. or lots of them.. theres no time limit between searches.. I want to see how fast bottlenecks are resolved

Cheers

Posted by Pete K on Aug-31-2004 03:09:

That was a like a 100000000X's faster then usual.

Posted by TweeK on Aug-31-2004 03:14:

WOW much faster.....

Posted by itsTrueSonic on Aug-31-2004 03:19:

wow .. pretty quick there..

using a different hashing function there?
faster search indices on your tables?
better database tuning algorithms?

Posted by Swamper on Aug-31-2004 03:20:

The true test will come when there are 700 ppl online

combination of a faster CPU and raided drives

plus I gotta fiddle with apache 2.x / mysql memory settings a little more

Posted by itsTrueSonic on Aug-31-2004 03:29:

quote:
Originally posted by Swamper
The true test will come when there are 700 ppl online

combination of a faster CPU and raided drives

plus I gotta fiddle with apache 2.x / mysql memory settings a little more

yes that will make a significant difference too..

haha..

Posted by insecurity on Aug-31-2004 03:47:

it is definitely a lot faster

Posted by Brady on Aug-31-2004 04:00:

Much faster...but when is unknown tracks gonna work again?

Posted by idoru on Aug-31-2004 04:03:

A search for tiesto came up faster than it did here. Real nice.

Posted by Swamper on Aug-31-2004 04:41:

quote:
Originally posted by Brady
Much faster...but when is unknown tracks gonna work again?

Unknowntracks -> http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/mp3/work/index.php

Wow, you just made my night. Sorry, but sometimes I forget to restart it.. I'd have it automated but I just assumed nobody bothered to use it these days.. I plan to relaunch it sometime since I spent so many weeks getting the stupid thing programmed years ago

As for searching for 'trance' ... that's not a very useful search.. in fact I'm probably gonna edit things so you can't just search on 'trance' - its pointless

Posted by Lira on Aug-31-2004 04:43:

Swamper, will we be able to look for "Goa", "BT" and "CD"? (word shorter than 4 letters... this is often necessary)

Posted by Arbiter on Aug-31-2004 04:55:

Search by username seems to take a lot longer than search by keywords. Overall speed is still very much improved though.

Posted by Swamper on Aug-31-2004 05:03:

quote:
Originally posted by Lira
Swamper, will we be able to look for "Goa", "BT" and "CD"? (word shorter than 4 letters... this is often necessary)

search for it in an exact phrase then

As for searching for usernames - those are not indexed - so it will always be slow - I'd have to see about improving that as well

Posted by Orbital32 on Aug-31-2004 06:25:

i searched HTTP that took a long time to load, but i did get tons of results. Hey, you said you wanted to stress it

Posted by Ian on Aug-31-2004 10:32:

tranceaddict Forums > Search > Thread Results
Displaying Topics 1 to 14 of 2034

that's a 2 ish second search for 'ferry corsten'

nice work del, keep the speed coming, though the thursday asot timeslot when the forum is full of armin-ites will be a test

Posted by Swamper on Aug-31-2004 20:04:

bump

Posted by montana on Aug-31-2004 20:06:

wow that was fast

Posted by DjDeComp on Aug-31-2004 20:12:

very nice

Posted by Ian on Aug-31-2004 20:17:

quote:
Originally posted by Swamper
bump

great example to set there

Posted by Swamper on Aug-31-2004 20:18:

quote:
Originally posted by Ian^
great example to set there

How about being a nice lad and doing a search for me?

Posted by StereoPrincess on Aug-31-2004 20:25:

i searched "funny" and it took a while.

when i wanted to go to page 370 or whatever that took a while too.

Posted by Ian on Aug-31-2004 20:29:

quote:
Originally posted by Swamper
How about being a nice lad and doing a search for me?

ok, a picta-search

results

oh and the search took under a second, so the speed is good

Posted by Yan on Aug-31-2004 20:42:

Speed is quite fast. The actual search results came up very precise.

Posted by jon on Aug-31-2004 21:18:

doing a search for ukta took 10 seconds

Posted by Tranc3 on Aug-31-2004 21:20:

Unless you implemented that filter to stop searches like "trance," the search is broken

"doing" yields the no matches screen

Pages (2): [1] 2 »