TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- mixers
mixers
after experiencing the might of the Pioneer DJM-600 i am compelled to purchase a new mixer with more channels and FX and stuff..
just looking at cheaper alternatives because i cant afford a Pioneer at the momment...
one of the ones i came up with was the
Behringer Pro DJ Mixer DJX700
just wanted to know what quality of these are like and if they are worth purchasing or if they're just too shitty to bother with..
any advice would be great also, mnaybe some other possible reccomendations as far as mixers go..
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI...3746386592&rd=1
save your money buy a rane.
best mixer money can buy. built like a tank and amazing sound quality.
but what makes these behringers so lower in $$$ then the pioneer..
like this is for home usage..
so is it still worthwhile getting?
i need something which is NO MORE EXPENSIVE then a
pioneer DJM-600
Behringer mixers are great, a friend of mine has had a behringer DX1000 for 2 years and its like new!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by dj_lane Behringer mixers are great, a friend of mine has had a behringer DX1000 for 2 years and its like new! |
whats a dr. sample??
i just wonder whether the DJX-700 is better then the DJM300 that i have no.. and if so why, and if not why.
i dont know much about mixers!!!
Dr. Sample is a stand alone sampler unit. The DJX-700, which is a clone of the Pioneer DJM-600 doesnt have a sampler like the DJM-600. So if you really needed that, I've heard the Dr. Sample is good:
http://www.rolandus.com/products/de...0&prodid=SP-303
The DJM300 is 2 channel, DJX-700 is 5. DJX-700 has effects, DJM300 doesnt. DJX-700 is cheaper, DJM300 is more expensive.
-Mark
there must be a reason for it 
but yeh
i think ill go the behringer 
I'd say the reason is somewhat similar to the reason that Gimp is free and Photoshop costs hundreds of dollars. You're paying for the name.
I'm not saying that Pioneer mixers arent good, I'm just saying that the main thing that drives the cost up is the name. A mixer with nearly the same features cant cost nearly as much as Pioneer is charging for it if Behringer can do it for so much less.
-Mark
IMO ..Pioneer mixers are the worst in sound qaulity but best for features.
You must ask yourself whats more important; sound or features. You can not have the best of both worlds on a budget. Its like buying a new car..you cant expect to buy a truck but the perofmance of a sports coupe. Or buy the best beer at a store w/ $5.
I prefer sound quality above all else.
Thus I choose a Denon X-800 mixer when I was strapped for cash.
Once I got enough money I sold my denon and upgraded to Rane.
dude.... dont give this guy false information. search on TA forums and you will see how much djx-700 suck. the eqs are practically shit. the FX sound like crap. djm maybe not have really great sound quality but the eqs and fx are at least up to standard for its price. i tried the djx-700 that my friend had. and he sold it 2 days after he got it. it sucks. why is it so cheap? yes, cos it fucking sucks.
Behringer = Useless
hmm intersting topic
can any1 tell me if the Stanton SMX-301 is any good ?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by kron dude.... dont give this guy false information. search on TA forums and you will see how much djx-700 suck. the eqs are practically shit. the FX sound like crap. djm maybe not have really great sound quality but the eqs and fx are at least up to standard for its price. i tried the djx-700 that my friend had. and he sold it 2 days after he got it. it sucks. why is it so cheap? yes, cos it fucking sucks. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by hooj1 Behringer = Useless |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by mixx941 Right. Thats why all my equipment has been on for 2+ years, 24/7/365 and it still works just as good as the day I bought it. If you can save several hundred dollars for a mixer that works just fine, has just about the same features, and is durable (which I have proven by keeping all my equipment on 24/7), then I dont see how or why it's useless. I'm not trying to start a flame war here, or be a dick, but please use the stuff before you rag on it. |
this could be a very useful thread. I am also kinda lookin into new mixers as well. Right now I am using the Numark DM3002X. I fucking love this mixer!!! It doesn't have alot of effects to play with, but I know the friggin thing inside out! Now I'm getting alot of cracklingnoises, like dust buildup, but it's to the point where I can't even use my cross fader anymore.
So considering my Numark DM3002X, can anyone help point me in a direction that I might want to go with my next mixer? I've really only played on this mixer, anyone got any comparisons???
| quote: |
| Originally posted by CosmoKid It seems like you are the exception and not the rule. I hear endless stories about these things breaking down very quickly. The sound quality is also terrible on this. My buddy had his berringer for 7 months before it completely shit the bed. If you dont have a grand to drop on a mixer get a vestax 275. sound quality is great, built like a tank, and will last you for a while. |
heh thats nice now how about answering to my question :P or no one had ever had such a mixer ??? if U didnt can some1 say if they heard anything about it or something ? pls ? 
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.