(Trance) .A.Y. - Getting Wild (128kbps)

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Producers Promotion
-- (Trance) .A.Y. - Getting Wild (128kbps)

Posted by .A.Y. on Sep-15-2004 10:40:

(Trance) .A.Y. - Getting Wild (128kbps)

dont be afraid from the name, its not hardstyle or something like this heh

in the full version i'll add a vocal to the track
(as allways, this is the short version )

anyway, here is the link:
http://www.o-zen.com/art/bands/22/music.php
"Getting Wild (short version)" 04:21

hope you like it

Posted by .A.Y. on Sep-15-2004 13:27:

thank you for your comments

Posted by optik on Sep-15-2004 13:38:

swap you bizzatch =)

(link in sig)

very boucy start - very clean and dry and centarl in the stereo fiels

I'd add a delay to the hats to get it out a little more

all your sampled effect bring out the field nicely, but when they go, we are left with something very mono - use a few effect sparingly on your percs.

this track is ok, but needs production work, as the details really aren't there - there is a splattering of effect samples, but it needs to have more depth to be trance imho

could look at using some less conventional percs and hats

structurally - it kinda just stays on g and f sharp all the way through - which makes it kinda boring.

needs work =)

Posted by optik on Sep-15-2004 13:40:

addition - it gets a lot better after 5:00 - for some reason, my winamp playbar is right over at the end at 5, leaving me thinking it was over!!

but the real problem is it takes 5 mins to get too!!!

5 mins - thats allowing a little too much for a beatmix in my humble =)

NEEDS MAJOR STRUCTURE WORK!!!

Posted by extalin on Sep-15-2004 13:42:

listening.

FINALLY YOU CHANGE THE BASS YOU EVIL MAN.

haha i thought i was gonna have to be like "it would be good if you introduce some changes in the bass note". but apparently at 2:57 the song improves by 1000%. if i were you, then i would introduce one of the notes of the bass ahead of time before the break so it's not a total shock, but i can kinda tell you want it to be all sudden like that (maybe it makes it better when it finally does happen).

2:14 when the arp lead comes right in after it breaks that's hot
2:57 the chord / bass changes are great
3:23 that new little filtered smooth synth is really nice and adds a lot to it
3:50 the drop thing is cool, but it gets really simple really fast, but i guess that's why it's teh short version

anyway, it reminds me of an olderschool trance with a big ass lead kinda very anthemic i guess, but i could be wrong!

Posted by .A.Y. on Sep-15-2004 13:49:

optik: 5 minutes?! are you sure you have downloaded the right track?
please check it again

extalin: lol

the whole idea of the track is to let you wait until the "big" change is coming
it gives the track a little clubby atmosphere

and now i can say:
thank you for your comments!

Posted by optik on Sep-15-2004 14:21:

ahhh- I see what was going on - I skipped forward in the track, and it started again for some reason, but didn't reset the time!!!

scratch the comments re- progression/structure - it gets going nicely at 2:57!!!

sorry about that =)

- tis strange the way it screws up the time in winamp...

=)

Posted by JM007 on Sep-15-2004 14:26:

I feel like I heared every sample in that song a thousand times before.

Posted by Jay M on Sep-15-2004 16:42:

quote:
Originally posted by JM007
I feel like I heared every sample in that song a thousand times before.

x2. Presettish tune indeed.

Has an uplifting feel which i like tho. A bit of a primitive bass, you'd better change that as well.

Melody is a few tads too cheesy.

Production quality is decent.

Posted by .A.Y. on Sep-15-2004 19:27:

cheesy?

well, i'll try to fix what i can

thanks!

Posted by TriXed on Sep-16-2004 01:10:

I agree on the cheese factor... At 11:30 in im just waiting for some stupid female vocals that go "and i will love you till i die on the bridge of love" or something of that crappy nature...

Im waiting till this gets better becuase it could.... come on any second now...Bass line is a bit.. dumn dumn dumn... :S I mean its a bit.. well lacking in variation and for me kick.. but i like my bass lines dirty as fuck.

Yeah the cheese is smelling a bit too much for me now (3:20 mins)

Not really to my liking sorry man.. but production wise its quite good.. different approach.. nice to see a different layout for a change.

Posted by pho mo on Sep-17-2004 05:30:

Nice tune mate, you pulled off the main melody brilliantly, there are a great number of pieces that fit oh-so-nicely together, and the whole thing has the kind of drive and energy that makes this style of trance work so well! I like it!

Posted by .A.Y. on Sep-17-2004 09:55:

thanks!

Posted by alexpea on Sep-17-2004 10:46:

wow, that's a fast arpeggio you've made there! But at 02.57 the whole track lost it's tension, in a bad way. The bass-changes could have been different. I mean, other notes. Because I didn't hear the harmony...