TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- really sick and tired of this kerry vs. bush arguments
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by re2two on Sep-17-2004 06:48:

really sick and tired of this kerry vs. bush arguments

i'm sorry all this kerry vs bush crap is pissing me off. i'm sticking with bush. i have a strong feeling if kerry wins, america will fall apart. terrorist will bully us and kerry will continue to hug trees.

FOUR MORE YEARS!


Posted by Yan on Sep-17-2004 06:49:

Wrong forum.

There's a political forum, ya know?

And I'm voting Bush, too.


Posted by Yan on Sep-17-2004 07:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Nou
If you vote for bush you are the most easily manipulated people on the planet. I feel sorry for you.


quote:
Originally posted by Nou
Im sorry, but god, you honestly think bush is protecting us from terrorism!? He basically threw rocks at the hornets nest, we been stung once, now we got a swarm of them after us.

When I get the chance Im getting out of this country so fast, I fucking hate this place.

I say the UN and EU sanction the US and then invade.


Ugh... Im sorry, but morons like you just really get me going.

Yea and stick this in the political forum, someone please.


Piss off, wanker. No one asked for your criticism.


Posted by |cEbLu3 on Sep-17-2004 07:30:

arrrr.... bloody hell, who let this kid outta the political forum, damn you!!!!


Posted by Stasha on Sep-17-2004 07:50:

i pray u ppl will gather so much sanity not to wote for Bush ... dont u see the whole world despises America because of him ? ...

have you seen fahrenheit 11/9 ? ... or bUSH censored that too ? ... in addition to french / freedom fries shame ?

i advise you to read some literature on mass propaganda ... by philip zimbardo ... and you will find yourself there ... if u still have a hidden part of your brains unwashed


Posted by JayD on Sep-17-2004 07:51:

quote:
Originally posted by Yan
Piss off, wanker. No one asked for your criticism.


Relax, he was just stating an opinion. No need to attack people.

JaY


Posted by Yan on Sep-17-2004 08:30:

quote:
Originally posted by JayD
Relax, he was just stating an opinion. No need to attack people.

JaY


Hehe. Sorry.

But I think we all know how "opinions" are responded to outside the political forum.


Posted by policerobots on Sep-17-2004 10:28:

farienheit 9/11...dont even get me started on the claims in that movie


Posted by Psionic on Sep-17-2004 13:08:

Bush has shown weak leadership, especially more recently, and thinks he's protecting us while other forces are making us more vulnerable to terrorism.


Posted by LiquidX on Sep-17-2004 13:29:

Re: really sick and tired of this kerry vs. bush arguments

quote:
Originally posted by re2two
i'm sorry all this kerry vs bush crap is pissing me off. i'm sticking with bush. i have a strong feeling if kerry wins, america will fall apart. terrorist will bully us and kerry will continue to hug trees.

FOUR MORE YEARS!


Really shows you don't like either candidate right?!?!.. had to be .. Republican! .. yea 4 more years!

Besides, dont you not see that by attacking Iraq, we have become more vulnerable and have made Al Quaida stronger?!?!?! .. theres something called.. Thinking and researching. sir.


Posted by GODLESSCOMMIE on Sep-17-2004 15:00:

Maybe my sense of curiosity is a wee bit off, but I might just vote for Bush to see how much worse things can get. Course though his support of outsourcing jobs especially makes it a coin toss for me.


Posted by Swamper on Sep-17-2004 17:57:

Looking at things realistically here.. chances are.. bush will win.. and.. in a twisted way that is a good thing because this time he'll have to clean up his own mess and not leave his shit for someone else to deal with


Posted by Trancer-X on Sep-17-2004 18:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Swamper
Looking at things realistically here.. chances are.. bush will win.. and.. in a twisted way that is a good thing because this time he'll have to clean up his own mess and not leave his shit for someone else to deal with


I only wish that were true. He left a heaping pile of a legacy that is still stinking up Texas.


Posted by LiquidX on Sep-17-2004 19:17:

quote:
Originally posted by Swamper
Looking at things realistically here.. chances are.. bush will win.. and.. in a twisted way that is a good thing because this time he'll have to clean up his own mess and not leave his shit for someone else to deal with


The only problem is.. if the US goes down, the rest of the world will go down with him.. and if we get him out this year, there is hope for the world to be a better place, still.. I dont really want Bush to be the man to bring us into world war 3 or the end of the world.


Posted by Shakka on Sep-17-2004 19:22:

quote:
Originally posted by LiquidX
The only problem is.. if the US goes down, the rest of the world will go down with him.. and if we get him out this year, there is hope for the world to be a better place, still.. I dont really want Bush to be the man to bring us into world war 3 or the end of the world.


World War III ended in the early 90's(Cold War/Communism). We're into WWIV now. Who was it that coined the phrase(when asked about the scope of the next world war), "I don't know what WWIII will be fought with, but WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones."


Posted by Stasha on Sep-17-2004 19:44:

quote:
Originally posted by policerobots
farienheit 9/11...dont even get me started on the claims in that movie


face it .... bush sux ... hopefully u wont make the same mistake

and yes ... the whole world sees you mostly on the basis of that movie ... and french aka freedom fries idiotism


Posted by Shakka on Sep-17-2004 19:49:

quote:
Originally posted by Stasha
and yes ... the whole world sees you mostly on the basis of that movie ... and french aka freedom fries idiotism


Good to know that people are getting their geopolitical viewpoints from sensationalized, Hollywood hack jobs. That's pretty sad, actually; and very telling, too.


Posted by leavingharvard on Sep-17-2004 22:14:

i dont know who to vote for. i hate nader, hate bush, hate kerry, hate republicans, hate democrats. who do i vote for? -.-


Posted by LiquidX on Sep-17-2004 22:57:

quote:
Originally posted by Sasha`
i dont know who to vote for. i hate nader, hate bush, hate kerry, hate republicans, hate democrats. who do i vote for? -.-


Tiesto.


Posted by 3xx3r7 on Sep-18-2004 00:37:

quote:
Originally posted by LiquidX
Tiesto.


I'd rather vote for him than any of these two jackasses. If Bush wins though, our economy is done for and we will live under constant terorrism scare.


Posted by LiquidX on Sep-18-2004 00:39:

quote:
Originally posted by 3xx3r7
I'd rather vote for him than any of these two jackasses. If Bush wins though, our economy is done for and we will live under constant terorrism scare.


YEah.. and reality check is.. One of them is lesser of two evils..


Posted by Trancer-X on Sep-18-2004 01:01:

quote:
Originally posted by Shakka
World War III ended in the early 90's(Cold War/Communism). We're into WWIV now. Who was it that coined the phrase(when asked about the scope of the next world war), "I don't know what WWIII will be fought with, but WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones."


WWIII never happened, if it had we would not be alive today.

Some people believe that we have just entered into WWIII with Bush's "War on Terror."

http://www.threeworldwars.com/world-war-3/ww3.htm


Posted by Q5echo on Sep-18-2004 03:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Trancer-X
WWIII never happened, if it had we would not be alive today.

Some people believe that we have just entered into WWIII with Bush's "War on Terror."

http://www.threeworldwars.com/world-war-3/ww3.htm

most historians consider the first real, modern "World War" was the Napoleonic Wars. it was fought on multiple fronts against allies and invaders,against superpowers and fascists. it set the world stage for the World War in 1914.
it involved France,
Britain,
Spain,
Prussia,
Austria,
Italy
in battlefields of other invaded countries from Egypt to Holland.


Posted by DR86 on Sep-18-2004 03:43:

Shakka,
in response to your question it was albert einstein. but i'm pretty sure he said WW3 will be fought with sticks and stones...no?


Posted by Trancer-X on Sep-18-2004 03:51:

quote:
Originally posted by DR86
Shakka,
in response to your question it was albert einstein. but i'm pretty sure he said WW3 will be fought with sticks and stones...no?


"I don't know what weapons will be used in WWIII, but I do know WWIV will be fought with spears and clubs!"

- Albert Einstein


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.