TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Let's all take the Global Test!
Let's all take the Global Test!
Enjoy!
http://transterrestrial.com/scripts/globaltest/
(I didn't pass...)
wow, sour grapes do make good whine
So, Are republicans really spinning this?!?!.. is all they can? .. can the president start focusing on the #1 issue america cares about most??.. Economy? perhaps...
Heh. That was pretty funny.
Liquid, I'm just curious--with regards to the economy, what are your real expectations? What numbers would be acceptable for you? Our economy is currently growing at a quarterly rate of 3.3%, which is not exactly a poor number for a developed economy. Employment numbers are coming back and are stabilizing. It's not the go-go 90's anymore. Inflation is low, interest rates are still at near-historical lows, home ownership is at an all time high(I just bought a house myself). It's not exactly doomsday out there. But seriously, since opinions are largely based on statistics, what specific targets and economic statistics do you think are reasonable and appropriate?
Historically low interest rates arent an indicator of a strong economy. Politicians usually like to claim that they are, but in reality low interest rates indicate that the economy needs a kick start.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Shakka (I just bought a house myself). It's not exactly doomsday out there. |
I'm in the neighborhood for a house next year, I'll tell you how the economy is fairing then 
lol.
I answered 'French' to the first question.
Boy that was easy
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Shakka Heh. That was pretty funny. Liquid, I'm just curious--with regards to the economy, what are your real expectations? What numbers would be acceptable for you? Our economy is currently growing at a quarterly rate of 3.3%, which is not exactly a poor number for a developed economy. Employment numbers are coming back and are stabilizing. It's not the go-go 90's anymore. Inflation is low, interest rates are still at near-historical lows, home ownership is at an all time high(I just bought a house myself). It's not exactly doomsday out there. But seriously, since opinions are largely based on statistics, what specific targets and economic statistics do you think are reasonable and appropriate? |
French (The International Language of Diplomacy)
should read:
French (The Former International Language of Diplomacy)
>JM<
edit.
We're sorry, but your score of -4100 is not sufficiently high to justify your imperialistic foreign adventure. You will be billed for this test, and you may take it again, by pressing the "Repeat Test" button below.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by LiquidX So, Are republicans really spinning this?!?!.. is all they can? .. can the president start focusing on the #1 issue america cares about most??.. Economy? perhaps... |

| quote: |
Originally posted by speedracer_mec |
This is exactly how the conservatives turned the tables on the 1st debate in 2000 on Gore. They used a cute punch line and flipped it around, twisted it in all directions, and pushed it hard enough to stick.
Dems., don't worry about it. Here's why:
1. Sunday's morning round up was, for better or worse, absolutely obsessed with the new polls showing Kerry either in a tie or pulling ahead. I really hate the media's obsession with the polls, but this time it actually served a favor as it substantially drowned out a good portion of conservative pundits attempting to fire this cute little talking point out.
2. Condi Rice had to defend her ass for her prior knowledge of Iraq's nuclear capability, or lack thereof. Because of the NYTimes piece on Sunday, all Conservatives were, once again, forced to backpedal and defend themselves. If there's one thing the Conservatives absolutely suck at doing, it's putting on a successful defense when the facts are clearly not in their favor. This alone was worth me putting up with my Sunday morning hangover and watch as much morning talk shows as I could.
3. Folks, Kerry wiped Bush with his ass, and no matter how much the conservatives want to spin, they themselves cannot get away from that fact. Bush was the antithesis of Kerry - nervous, agitated, clearly annoyed, and incredibly repetitive of the same talking points over and over.
---------------
It's for these reasons why this cute little line is not affective in any way against Kerry. It also goes without saying that I firmly believe that even the Conservatives know what Kerry was referring to here, though he likely could have reworded it better. Nevertheless, I'm still enjoying the defensive stance and "spitballs" being hurled by the Conservatives.
-------------------
Partisan hacking aside, I do think Cheney will do a much better job against Edwards, and may actually help gain a point or two for the Conservatives. Although the fact checking may not be on Cheney's side, he still carries himself with a much more firmer fist than Bush. I believe that if anyone has any doubts on who wears the pants in the White House, it will most certainly be revealed tomorrow night. Plus any fact checking performed will be somewhat too late, because the resolute (but inaccurate) Cheney will demonstrate his eeevil Dark Force power and pursuade many weak-minded swing voters.
MUUUUHAAAHAAAHAAAHAAAHAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Speaking of global tests, i thought these were pretty funny:


Edit: If speedracer posted the kerry pic I apologize ... my company is filtering out whatever photo he posted.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by occrider Speaking of global tests, i thought these were pretty funny: |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.