TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- The US Election & Politics Thread
Pages (9): [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 »
The Politics Thread
Guys let's be sensible about what we type.
We're here as a part of a generation of EDM listeners not
I repeat
NOT, to bash on one another's political views.
Whatever you support that's cool, let's just respect each other.
Anyway, if you got something intelligent to say about the current political situation that won't offend anyone type it in here otherwise just keep it to yourself.
kthxbye
P.S. My two cents - since Kerry supports Scientific Research and is willing to create more government grants for that area, and both of my parents are immunologists, I support him. However I believe the country can benefit from both candidates. I mean these guys graduated Yale and whatnot - you can't just sneak through Yale, even if you are an x-presidents son. So I believe each one of them is an intelligent human being with lots of good ideas, though Bush does struggle with wording them properly, but that's fine - there are many of us that can't word shit properly, just check out some threads.
that thread should die for being opened instead of beign a reply @ some other thread 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MatthewAdams that thread should die for being opened instead of beign a reply @ some other thread |
i would merge them all, but if i did that it would create an uber-thread that would be undeletable without grinding the server to a halt for about 3 hours.
any further threads will be closed 
edit: in fact, this can now be the trash can for all the election business.. i am comandeering your thread 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tu_face i would merge them all, but if i did that it would create an uber-thread that would be undeletable without grinding the server to a halt for about 3 hours. any further threads will be closed ![]() edit: in fact, this can now be the trash can for all the election business.. i am comandeering your thread |
Ok, so back to the discussion I tried to start:
What do people think Kerry is gonna do? Be a man and admit defeat today so that the country can move on, or go democrat crybaby on us and drag things out until all provisional ballots are counted in Ohio?
Hell, at least Al Gore had some credibility to his challenge. After all, he was less than 1000 votes behind in the deciding state and he won the popular vote by a small margin.
I think if Kerry does not concede today he ends up looking like an idiot. He lost the national popular vote by 3.5 million votes and its all but impossible for provisional ballots to make up the 140,000 votes he is behind in Ohio.
Why go down in history as a bigger crybaby loser than Al Gore?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by XaNaX Ok, so back to the discussion I tried to start: What do people think Kerry is gonna do? Be a man and admit defeat today so that the country can move on, or go democrat crybaby on us and drag things out until all provisional ballots are counted in Ohio? Hell, at least Al Gore had some credibility to his challenge. After all, he was less than 1000 votes behind in the deciding state and he won the popular vote by a small margin. I think if Kerry does not concede today he ends up looking like an idiot. He lost the national popular vote by 3.5 million votes and its all but impossible for provisional ballots to make up the 140,000 votes he is behind in Ohio. |
As much as i hate to agree. i do there's no way kerry is winning now. Anyways, i wonder when the US will bring the draft back. Ive never been alive with a draft in place. will be interesting to watch you all being dragged off to war. Good job voting for war.
I think we're at war whether we like it or not.
Terrorism is not going to pack up and go away if Kerry shows up in the office.
Personally I like the Soviet Union's policy on terrorism -
if you kidnap any of our country mates we find out who you are and kill your family - that's why they started wearing masks in decapitation videos
since 1997 (or something) there hasn't been a single russian captive in the middle east
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Mike_B As much as i hate to agree. i do there's no way kerry is winning now. Anyways, i wonder when the US will bring the draft back. Ive never been alive with a draft in place. will be interesting to watch you all being dragged off to war. Good job voting for war. |
We are FUCKED for the next 30 years, not 4, if Bush wins and here's why.
It's 30 years and not 4 because of the Supreme Court. In this next four years, THREE justices will be either dying or retiring, including the chief justice. The next president will appoint new justices, and that will affect our next 30 years. Needless to say Bush will appoint Justices with similiar values to his own and with the Republican control of both House and Senate, whoever Bush appoints will be guaranteed.
Hope everyone likes ultra right winged conservatism.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Aristronica I think we're at war whether we like it or not. Terrorism is not going to pack up and go away if Kerry shows up in the office. Personally I like the Soviet Union's policy on terrorism - if you kidnap any of our country mates we find out who you are and kill your family - that's why they started wearing masks in decapitation videos since 1997 (or something) there hasn't been a single russian captive in the middle east |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Mike_B No Russia just gets terrorised from the inside by Chechen rebels trained by Islamist. must better situation there |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Scottaculous We are FUCKED for the next 30 years, not 4, if Bush wins and here's why. It's 30 years and not 4 because of the Supreme Court. In this next four years, THREE justices will be either dying or retiring, including the chief justice. The next president will appoint new justices, and that will affect our next 30 years. Needless to say Bush will appoint Justices with similiar values to his own and with the Republican control of both House and Senate, whoever Bush appoints will be guaranteed. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Scottaculous We are FUCKED for the next 30 years, not 4, if Bush wins and here's why. It's 30 years and not 4 because of the Supreme Court. In this next four years, THREE justices will be either dying or retiring, including the chief justice. The next president will appoint new justices, and that will affect our next 30 years. Needless to say Bush will appoint Justices with similiar values to his own and with the Republican control of both House and Senate, whoever Bush appoints will be guaranteed. Hope everyone likes ultra right winged conservatism. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Mike_B yup your right. Its gonna be a nice downhill for human rights and liberty in the State for the next few decades. I find it weird how its like a step in the opposite direction from where most democratic nation are heading. Most Democrotie are passing legislation for legalisation of drugs, gay marrige, all kinds of liberal rights. The Unite State because of large Republican representation is diong just the opposite. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Aristronica yeah actually they were trained by us (as in russia), they were used as militarists starting with the czars, just after WWII they wanted independence and we said "fuck you, you got oil ties" in all cases it's a political war, we could easily go in there and destroy all that garbage but we keep plucking away, cuz there's no better solution and i'll be darned if the state cares about the people unless it's to better their image or look scary to others |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Mike_B If this was 50 years ago before the UN and media was properly established, you could be ganrantied Russia would of massacared the Chechens to shut them up. With the world watching your every step its sure harder to just go in and slaughter a people. Even if they are full of crazy suicidal radicals bent on Terrorism. |
I'm just curious why the majourity of the people who voted yesterday, said no on letting gay people get married?
*shrugs*
I'm not Gay, but like, I don't know why anyone would care if Gays wanted to marry?? Why are we even voting on that?
I guess its that "hardcore Christian" mentality.
I think the democratic party as a whole should stand up and take notice at this election.
The fact that George Bush was able do beat Kerry by 3.5 million votes during a time when gas is $2 a gallon most places, the economy is in a shaky recovery, jobs have not fully recovered, WMD has not been found in Iraq, and Bin Laden has not been captured shows that the American public has no confidence in the democrats.
The real problem here is trust and I think that most people dont trust Kerry or the democrats.
In Congress the republicans picked up 2 more seats in the Senate and 10 seats in the House. The Senate minority leader lost his seat, when the hell is the last time that happened?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by placebo I'm just curious why the majourity of the people who voted yesterday, said no on letting gay people get married? *shrugs* I'm not Gay, but like, I don't know why anyone would care if Gays wanted to marry?? Why are we even voting on that? I guess its that "hardcore Christian" mentality. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by placebo I'm just curious why the majourity of the people who voted yesterday, said no on letting gay people get married? *shrugs* I'm not Gay, but like, I don't know why anyone would care if Gays wanted to marry?? Why are we even voting on that? I guess its that "hardcore Christian" mentality. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Aristronica it's cuz married couples get tax breaks and other goodies from the government (better welfare and social security), and some people just don't deem them worthy of that, the whole marriage part doesn't matter it's how it legally changes your situation within the state and country |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Mike_B Deem then worthy of it. lol Im not gay either but common. i mean who cares what they do. Goerge Bush called gay marriage an attack on Strait families. Gimmy a break its not like gay ppl are gonna magicly cause strait ppl to get divorsed. Problem is that the marrige Bush is talking about and thinking about are not the same. What he's talking about is married by law, the other that he's thinking of in By god in a church. Not the same thing at all. And you're right Gay ppl what to get married for the reason stated above. I mean would you. Imagine your wife, falls sick and is lying on her death bed. But they wont let you in cause you're not familly. This to us is unbeleivable. Well gay ppl have to deal with that becaue they aren't technicly married by law, they aren't familly. I think this is ridiculus. who cares what others do. Keep your religion to yourselves and don't push it on others. State and religion should not be together, they have nothing to do with each other |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by placebo I'm just curious why the majourity of the people who voted yesterday, said no on letting gay people get married? *shrugs* I'm not Gay, but like, I don't know why anyone would care if Gays wanted to marry?? Why are we even voting on that? |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.