TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- deat of winamp (as we know it??)


Posted by jon on Nov-11-2004 22:13:

deat of winamp (as we know it??)

http://www.betanews.com/article/Dea...namp/1100111204

who remembers using wimamp 1?


Posted by D-res on Nov-11-2004 22:25:

eh...

im not worried about anything


Posted by M1cro5lave on Nov-11-2004 23:03:

I'm still in love with Winamp 2.81


It's sad. But I can still live my life.


Posted by Geoff on Nov-12-2004 00:32:

quote:
Originally posted by M1cro5lave
I'm still in love with Winamp 2.81


It's sad. But I can still live my life.



hehe same here, i'll proly use 2.81 till the day I die


Posted by Absolut_Vodka on Nov-12-2004 00:40:

sad to see but doesnt bother me. Been using 2.81 since they fucked up 3.0, and will continue doing so for a very long time...


Posted by AndskiSpeed on Nov-12-2004 00:43:

Ah well, I only use winamp 2 anyway


Posted by Azz3D on Nov-12-2004 01:56:

since we're talking about winamp

the best skin ever for winamp 5



and yeah that is my desktop


Posted by echosystm on Nov-12-2004 02:05:

YAY, now everyone can take their heads out their asses and start using foobar2000 !!

WINNERS


Posted by malek on Nov-12-2004 03:50:

omg its deat!!!


Posted by kamil on Nov-12-2004 04:34:

quote:
Originally posted by Azz3D
since we're talking about winamp

the best skin ever for winamp 5



and yeah that is my desktop


thats one of the UGLIEST skins for winamp.......FUCKING GROSS!!


Posted by D-res on Nov-12-2004 04:40:


Posted by Tranc3 on Nov-12-2004 04:48:

what's a deat?

And Jon, I remember winamp 1


Posted by rabbitjoker on Nov-12-2004 06:03:

The founders left because they wanted to see Winamp remain a relatively open source/free type of product and AOL has plans to bundle the player into content offerings, etc.

----

Just because the founders of a company quit, get fired, die or otherwise depart does not mean the end of a product.

Winamp will come back - as it is a viable product in a high-growth medium - the challenge was simply monitizing it in it's current form.

No need to cry over spilt milk. It's funny how fat-cat VC money stuffed founders sometimes delude themselves into thinking what they're doing is some just moral cause - when really, it's just business (make or buy, sell at a profit).

PS - I use 5.05 Pro to run 2HP.ca Radio.


Posted by Massive84 on Nov-12-2004 12:13:

Does this mean i can't use winamp anymore?

i don't get it.


Posted by Gholy Host on Nov-12-2004 15:20:

That womans skin is greene.

Most of the little circular skins appeal to me. Except when I'm playing a set, and I'm looking for a particular song, and that slider that's all of a half inch long becomes a real hassle.


Sad to see winamp go. But it's not a big deal. Someone will jump in to replace them, and until they do we can try the rest of the crappy media players.


Posted by dchaves on Nov-12-2004 16:19:

quote:
Originally posted by Massive84
Does this mean i can't use winamp anymore?

i don't get it.


Yes, since the original developers had left the project, all of our winamp copies will start to malfunction, and the setup program (for those of us who keep a back up) will be corrupted so we can't reinstall it and have to move to WMP


Posted by b.cl4y on Nov-12-2004 16:37:

I've used winamp for years... oh well, all good things come to an end sometime...


Posted by Phil r on Nov-13-2004 00:44:

you guys are using winamp 2.81?

nah...

try an AM ~200kHz frequency range receiver. bypass the local oscillator with a 3MHz crystal from maplins, you can get the thing to run on the same frequency as ur phone line, and multiplex the thing to receive the internet radio stations.

no compatibility problems.

no boot up times.

no crashes.

you can't skin it, but then if you're hard core that won't be a problem. (well, you could paint it)

rocks.

needs xp media center and a 3.2GHz P4 with 2 gig of ram & Nitro cooling to demodulate the output. but hey.


Posted by itsTrueSonic on Nov-13-2004 00:49:

oh well.. and i was getting used to the new Winamp 5. i am loving the auto-hide feature on winamp. that is tight. i just dock the player on the top of the screen. i also like the multiple playlist, which was first implemented in winamp3. but what i don't like is how winamp takes 20% of my cpu when the original UI is open, but when i minimize my UI to the streteched auto hide UI, it goes down to the normal 3-5% cpu usage. ... too much graphic manipulation?

oh yes and i also like it when the regular UI is open, and you stretch the player, the beat graphics displays.


Posted by Phil r on Nov-13-2004 01:05:

not too surprised tho...

AOL buying Time Warner & Nullsoft is like Ford buying a company with a division making matter transporters.

"oops, we've just bought a company that has a small division which we didn't know about, that creates a product which, if successful, will kill our business"

d'oh.



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.