TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Cyberlibel - Be careful with what you post...
Cyberlibel - Be careful with what you post...
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/serv.../BNStory/Front/
An Ontario judge has awarded an archeologist $125,000 in damages after a native man used e-mails to smear her as a �grave robber.�
The archeologist's lawyer is calling the ruling a precedent-setting one in the emerging field of Internet libel, a notion that may eventually have a chilling effect on the freewheeling ways computer users send messages.
�People seem to think there is a level of anonymity to e-mail and the Internet. And that it's a lawless area,� said winning lawyer Berkley Sells. �And clearly it is not, nor should it be.�
In a decision released this week, Madam Justice Wailan Low of the Ontario Superior Court sketched out a rough hierarchy of what she called �cyberlibel.�
Posting slanderous remarks on a popular website, where millions of users might pick them up and circulate them, might be one the more egregious uses of technology, she said. But close behind that is e-mailing libellous remarks in an attempt to smear someone's reputation.
�Clearly, the use of e-mail is far more powerful than the sending out of a multiple of hard-copy letters defaming the plaintiff,� Judge Low ruled.
this doesnt scare me, but its not a good thing
big brother is watching youuuuuuuuuu
...sue me, biatchez!
i remember getting slammed a while back when i sited libel in all the remarks made about Guvernment.
Nice to see im not so crazy after all.
i wonder what happens if u post cyberlibel from a non-extradition country..
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Crazy Serb ...sue me, biatchez! |
Re: Cyberlibel - Be careful with what you post...
| quote: |
| Originally posted by rabbitjoker http://www.theglobeandmail.com/serv.../BNStory/Front/ An Ontario judge has awarded an archeologist $125,000 in damages after a native man used e-mails to smear her as a �grave robber.� The archeologist's lawyer is calling the ruling a precedent-setting one in the emerging field of Internet libel, a notion that may eventually have a chilling effect on the freewheeling ways computer users send messages. �People seem to think there is a level of anonymity to e-mail and the Internet. And that it's a lawless area,� said winning lawyer Berkley Sells. �And clearly it is not, nor should it be.� In a decision released this week, Madam Justice Wailan Low of the Ontario Superior Court sketched out a rough hierarchy of what she called �cyberlibel.� Posting slanderous remarks on a popular website, where millions of users might pick them up and circulate them, might be one the more egregious uses of technology, she said. But close behind that is e-mailing libellous remarks in an attempt to smear someone's reputation. �Clearly, the use of e-mail is far more powerful than the sending out of a multiple of hard-copy letters defaming the plaintiff,� Judge Low ruled. |

ffs all of u get a fuckin life ya wankers

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.