TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Nuke Iran and just get it over with?
Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Nuke Iran and just get it over with?
Lets not kid ourselves after shiite is in control, iraq will be a puppet state of iran so why are we kidding our selves, you think bush will just bomb them once election results are in? or will Iraq go into a civil war, creating another israel / palestine realation....
comments/thoughts?
the best thing to do is to split irak into three states. kurds, sunni, and shi'ites. that'd be the best thing. if we were to nuke iran, the international backlash would be enormous, and other nations would use this as an excuse to use their own nucleur weapons. unless iran were to strike first.
Re: Nuke Iran and just get it over with?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Petrogad Lets not kid ourselves after shiite is in control, iraq will be a puppet state of iran so why are we kidding our selves, you think bush will just bomb them once election results are in? or will Iraq go into a civil war, creating another israel / palestine realation.... comments/thoughts? |
YEAH ALRIGHT! LETZ DU IT!!!
Re: Nuke Iran and just get it over with?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Petrogad Lets not kid ourselves after shiite is in control, iraq will be a puppet state of iran so why are we kidding our selves, you think bush will just bomb them once election results are in? or will Iraq go into a civil war, creating another israel / palestine realation.... comments/thoughts? |
Re: Nuke Iran and just get it over with?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Petrogad Lets not kid ourselves after shiite is in control, iraq will be a puppet state of iran so why are we kidding our selves, you think bush will just bomb them once election results are in? or will Iraq go into a civil war, creating another israel / palestine realation.... comments/thoughts? |
Re: Re: Nuke Iran and just get it over with?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by George Smiley This is why I say we should have IQ tests before we are allowed to vote... |
i will be damned if we go to war with iran. we're going to war again, i know it.
Peterogad just cant make up his mind..one of his recent threads was should we just go PWN north korea
| quote: |
| Originally posted by zig Peterogad just cant make up his mind..one of his recent threads was should we just go PWN north korea |
lol, im not saying going to war w/ iraq was a good idea but im saying bush will get thirsty and wanna slay iran if he cant get to pwn north korea, specially if iran takes iraq to be its puppet state profiting off its oil.
and the nuke thing was to get your attention you think i was actually serious lolol its somthing bush would do not me....

Ok...
1) America is never ever gonna use nukes in conflicts like these
2) America does not have enough troops for another conflict (for years)
3) America cannot play the al-Qaida card with Iran
4) One excuse America could use is that it is a known sponsor of terrorism, but as that is mainly Hizballah, then that should be of no concern to America
5) I think (?) there is a moderate reformist movement in the country
6) Another excuse could be the plans for nuclear weapons, but there is already a diplomatic solution ongoing to that problem
7) I know this really doesn't bother Bush et al, but attacking yet another Muslim country would be disasterous for the war on terror
what about if they just supported iraq like iran is supporting the shiites pumping millions into iraq so they can gain leadership, dont you think that the US might indirectly be involved with a civil war in iraq (if the shiite take control), by providing aid + weapons + booze?
We're not nuking Iraq while we occupy the country, nor would we need to nuke them otherwise. We have enough conventional munitions to turn the country into a lunar landscape. The problem we've faced from the onset is how many civilian casualties do we need to inflict as collateral damage before ousting the insurgents.
[[[smoke]]]
| quote: |
| Originally posted by smokeape The problem we've faced from the onset is how many civilian casualties do we need to inflict as collateral damage before ousting the insurgents. [[[smoke]]] |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by habsfan Let's get one thing straight. As long as there are American troops OCCUPYING Iraq, there will be "insurgents". People don't like to be occupied. If 100,000 troops came into my country, started dropping bombs everywhere, stole my country's resources, and propped up a puppet regime, I would pick up a gun and start killing soldiers as well!!! And yes, it is a puppet regime. Regardless of the election results, the new "leader" of Iraq will be chosen by the U.S. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by smokeape So why don't you just tell us exactly what the insurgents want then. |
| quote: |
| First, we pull all of our troops out of Iraq. Next a fantatical religious dictatorship takes hold. Lastly, we're back where we started. |
| quote: |
| You obviously can't see our real purpose there. And most Iraqis don't think in the terms you've outlined. A small minority and certainly not a majority is fighting the US. If it were a majority, then there would be wholsale war on a much grander scale than what it is. What it is is guerilla warfare by a few. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by smokeape So why don't you just tell us exactly what the insurgents want then. |
| quote: |
First, we pull all of our troops out of Iraq. Next a fantatical religious dictatorship takes hold. Lastly, we're back where we started. You obviously can't see our real purpose there. |
| quote: |
And most Iraqis don't think in the terms you've outlined. A small minority and certainly not a majority is fighting the US. If it were a majority, then there would be wholsale war on a much grander scale than what it is. What it is is guerilla warfare by a few. [[[smoke]]] |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by habsfan I would say that most of these guerilla's have lost so much from this occupation (friends, family, home, etc.) that they feel they must resort to killing those that brought this grief upon them. You would do the same. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by habsfan [....]stole my country's resources, and propped up a puppet regime, I would pick up a gun and start killing soldiers as well!!! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by smokeape So why don't you just tell us exactly what the insurgents want then. First, we pull all of our troops out of Iraq. Next a fantatical religious dictatorship takes hold. Lastly, we're back where we started. You obviously can't see our real purpose there. And most Iraqis don't think in the terms you've outlined. A small minority and certainly not a majority is fighting the US. If it were a majority, then there would be wholsale war on a much grander scale than what it is. What it is is guerilla warfare by a few. [[[smoke]]] |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by PhloTron Hasn't the Quebecois been trying to make you believe this type of "theory" for the last 15 years in order for Quebec to seceed from Canada? I don't disagree with you...it was just funny to read the statement and the "location" of where it came... how odd |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by habsfan Ignorance is bliss isn't it? Your statement only strengthens the common belief that Americans don't know shit outside of their own borders |
I am just thinking what the hell does Iran have to do with anything?
No Iranian has murdered an American.
The U.S. has not come under attack by Iran.
Iran has not even threatened to attack the U.S.
Iran has no ties with Al-Qaeda.
They have agreed to stop their nucleur program. Which, personally, I don't think they should have seeing America's tendency for trigger happy pre-emptive strikes.
Oh wait, we could have said the same about Iraq
.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by razmataz I am just thinking what the hell does Iran have to do with anything? No Iranian has murdered an American. The U.S. has not come under attack by Iran. Iran has not even threatened to attack the U.S. Iran has no ties with Al-Qaeda. They have agreed to stop their nucleur program. Which, personally, I don't think they should have seeing America's tendency for trigger happy pre-emptive strikes. Oh wait, we could have said the same about Iraq . |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.