TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Super String Theory - Theory of Everything
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by Krypton on Dec-29-2004 18:19:

Read This! Super String Theory - Theory of Everything

Super String Theory

this is the strangest yet, most interesting theory ive ever come across. with extra dimensionals, a universal particle, explanations of time and space, and of gravity. mathematically, it is very possible and several labs are out there researching this theory everyday. trying to find particles called gravitrons that may explain gravity. banging hydrogen atoms together at incredible speeds sometimes causes the atom to explode releasing all the subatomic particles that make up the atom.

it is theorized that the gravitrons shape of a circular dimension would allow it to not be held by the laws of our demension and thus travel from one dimension to the next. to see this, you'de first have to observe a gravitron and then see if it disappears when colliding the atoms, of which gravitrons have not been observed yet. perhaps during this century, our technology will advance to the point of where we can investigate further.


Posted by hardcore trancer on Dec-29-2004 20:15:

Thumbs up

wow very intresting.


Posted by zig on Dec-29-2004 20:38:

Good link..but youd need a week in there after the basic stuff to get your head around it and come back here and discuss it meaningfully..imo


Posted by Dj Tomer on Dec-30-2004 00:31:

There are by now also the M-Theory (which explains why there are 5 different versions of String theory), and F-Theory, Which are 1 and 2 dimensions higher up then Superstring theory, respectfuly.
So instead of strings we now have a 3 dimensional string theory. Which is ironic since it was string theory which initially proposed that there were more then 3 physical dimensions to our universe.


Posted by zig on Dec-30-2004 00:37:

Ok two weeks


Posted by Dj Tomer on Dec-30-2004 00:41:

quote:
Originally posted by zig
Ok two weeks


Lol, I studied it for over a year in university and still know just the very basics


Posted by Krypton on Dec-30-2004 02:04:

quote:
Originally posted by Dj Tomer
Lol, I studied it for over a year in university and still know just the very basics


yea, the proponents of it have been researching it since the early 80's. they found it mathematically feasible in 1984, so u can say the birth of this field was in 1984, strange, b/c of orwell's novel.


Posted by zig on Dec-30-2004 02:09:

implications for religions seem to be in doubt because of this..


Posted by Dj Tomer on Dec-30-2004 02:11:

quote:
Originally posted by zig
implications for religions seem to be in doubt because of this..


you had to, huh?


Posted by Zild on Dec-30-2004 02:45:

quote:
Originally posted by zig
implications for religions seem to be in doubt because of this..


Maybe for you. However from my point of view science is starting to align itself with the major tenets of my spirituality. I think this is because the religion gave birth to science in the first place its only natural that science which is in its infancy would now barely begin to scratch the surface of religious ideas that are many millenia old.


Posted by Dj Tomer on Dec-30-2004 02:59:

No matter what science discovers, religious people will try and tell you that its either describing religion/describing the same ideas as religion.
When the notion of hyperspace was only in its infancy, and extra dimensions were speculated, people started to say that these extra dimensions explain why there is no proof of god's existence and such other crap. Face it people, science is DISproving your ideas.


Posted by zig on Dec-30-2004 03:13:

Are Zild and Tomer the same person i wonder.......... ?


Posted by Zild on Dec-30-2004 03:20:

No. I'm not agreeing with Tomer that science is disproving any of my spiritual beliefs at all, actually I believe the opposite. I'm going to be a scientist in a few years so I do have a slight idea of what I'm talking about. What if I tell you that the Egyptians believed in the spiritual tenet of vibration. Meaning that nothing in the universe is at rest, that everything is in a constant state of vibration. Now thats an idea that up until just recently would seem completely ridiculous. Modern science how now proved this belief to be absolutely true.


Posted by zig on Dec-30-2004 03:25:

ye but the idea is rediculous


Posted by Zild on Dec-30-2004 03:27:

The idea of vibration? Yep, totally ridiculous seeing as how everything is made up of even smaller parts that never really stop moving. This applies to humans, plants, animals, carpet, computers, turntables, desktop CDJs, bottled water, Guinness and everything else on this planet.


Posted by Dj Tomer on Dec-30-2004 03:27:

quote:
Originally posted by Zild
What if I tell you that the Egyptians believed in the spiritual tenet of vibration. Meaning that nothing in the universe is at rest, that everything is in a constant state of vibration. Now thats an idea that up until just recently would seem completely ridiculous. Modern science how now proved this belief to be absolutely true.


I fail to see your point. If the Egyptians believed something, and it has only recently been proved by modern science, what does that have to do with science crediting/discrediting religion?


Posted by Dj Tomer on Dec-30-2004 03:30:

quote:
Originally posted by zig
Are Zild and Tomer the same person i wonder.......... ?


that would be SOME split personality


Posted by Zild on Dec-30-2004 03:37:

Tomer because the tenet of vibration is only one of seven laid out by the Egyptians way before Christ (although its believed Christ was an initiate to the Egyptian mysteries.) I'm not here to teach a class in comparative religion so I won't delve any further but I hope you can see my point.


Posted by Dj Tomer on Dec-30-2004 03:46:

quote:
Originally posted by Zild
Tomer because the tenet of vibration is only one of seven laid out by the Egyptians way before Christ (although its believed Christ was an initiate to the Egyptian mysteries.) I'm not here to teach a class in comparative religion so I won't delve any further but I hope you can see my point.


I hope you understand that a person with little knowledge of religion, especially christianity (such as myself), would have no clue what the hell you're trying to say. But like you said, dont go into it any further, this is a useless discussion anyway.


Posted by Krypton on Dec-30-2004 04:30:

strange how every topic turns into a religious debate.

its theorized that a particle called an anti-matter, a particle of energy with no mass is the basic components of everything, u cant get any smaller than this thing. very interesting


Posted by Dj Tomer on Dec-30-2004 04:36:

quote:
Originally posted by ::TranceVanDyk::
strange how every topic turns into a religious debate.

its theorized that a particle called an anti-matter, a particle of energy with no mass is the basic components of everything, u cant get any smaller than this thing. very interesting


huh? superstrings are the basic components of everything, scientists still dont know what dark matter is really


Posted by Krypton on Dec-30-2004 05:04:

quote:
Originally posted by Dj Tomer
huh? superstrings are the basic components of everything, scientists still dont know what dark matter is really


yet something else to research. our technology is too low-tech. but just the idea of it, and how mathematically, its feasible and able to be described in a way is very interesting.

im off too bed, good debatin today lads


Posted by Sevas Stra on Dec-30-2004 06:24:

this reminds me of Angels and Deamons and Anti-Matter...


Posted by Zild on Dec-30-2004 08:00:

quote:
Originally posted by ::TranceVanDyk::
yet something else to research. our technology is too low-tech. but just the idea of it, and how mathematically, its feasible and able to be described in a way is very interesting.

im off too bed, good debatin today lads


You sir are correct. Human science and engineering is in its infantcy.


Posted by Sunsnail on Dec-30-2004 09:07:

I read this stuff a while ago, its very interesting.

Apparantly, It is 100% possible that anti-matter GALAXIES exist out there. It would give off the exact same radio waves, so we would really never find out. Sorry for being vague


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.