yes or no - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- yes or no
Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Posted by {b.s.e.} on Jan-17-2005 20:12:

yes or no

more fun with polls.

Posted by dEsidEL on Jan-17-2005 20:15:

i abstain

Posted by {b.s.e.} on Jan-17-2005 20:17:

abstenince is for sissies.

Posted by dEsidEL on Jan-17-2005 20:18:

yo couch

Posted by stren on Jan-17-2005 20:25:

aj dont get it

Posted by {b.s.e.} on Jan-17-2005 20:27:

quote:
Originally posted by stren
aj dont get it

Canadians are more complicated than most think

Posted by Slag on Jan-17-2005 20:32:

http://www.trials-shack.co.uk/posting.html

For those that havent seen this... watch it and learn.

Posted by {b.s.e.} on Jan-17-2005 20:33:

quote:
Originally posted by Slag
http://www.trials-shack.co.uk/posting.html

For those that havent seen this... watch it and learn.

Or you could vote and fuck off.

Posted by ++ EGO ++ on Jan-17-2005 20:35:

quote:
Originally posted by Slag
http://www.trials-shack.co.uk/posting.html

For those that havent seen this... watch it and learn.

I think this would apply to more than just one person on TA,
anyways.. this thread blows.

Posted by {b.s.e.} on Jan-17-2005 20:37:

quote:
Originally posted by ++ EGO ++
I think this would apply to more than just one person on TA,
anyways.. this thread blows.

kudos on two of the most perceptive comments i've read in a long time. vote and fuck off.

Posted by Silky Johnson on Jan-17-2005 20:38:

I voted yes, because no means yes anyways. Saves time.

Posted by {b.s.e.} on Jan-17-2005 20:39:

quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
I voted yes, because no means yes anyways. Saves time.

thank you for taking a serious thread seriously.

Posted by Silky Johnson on Jan-17-2005 20:41:

quote:
Originally posted by {b.s.e.}
thank you for taking a serious thread seriously.

TA = all serious, all the time.

Posted by {b.s.e.} on Jan-17-2005 20:46:

quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
TA = all serious, all the time.

wtf wtf wtf wtf wtf omg.

Posted by Slag on Jan-17-2005 20:54:

Posted by {b.s.e.} on Jan-17-2005 20:56:

edit:

was that a yes or a no?

Posted by Slag on Jan-17-2005 21:01:

quote:
Originally posted by {b.s.e.}
good one. what online archive of flame pictures did you find that redundant piece of shit?

You like swearing a lot don't you?
It really shows your intelligence. *clap clap*

Posted by {b.s.e.} on Jan-17-2005 21:08:

quote:
Originally posted by Slag
You like swearing a lot don't you?
It really shows your intelligence. *clap clap*

it does, does it? i should swear a lot more often; fuck shit cunt piss goddamn cockslap dirty sanchez.

Posted by Silky Johnson on Jan-17-2005 21:12:

quote:
Originally posted by {b.s.e.}
it does, does it? i should swear a lot more often; fuck shit cunt piss goddamn cockslap dirty sanchez.

DICKSHITFUCKBITCH****COCKBALLSPUSSYASSEATER

Posted by stren on Jan-17-2005 21:13:

quote:
Originally posted by {b.s.e.}
Canadians are more complicated than most think

they are slow that's fo sho prolly cause of the cold

Posted by {b.s.e.} on Jan-17-2005 21:13:

seriously though, i was reading a study that noted there was a direct correlation between filthy talkers and extremely high IQs. i lost the link though

Posted by {b.s.e.} on Jan-17-2005 21:14:

quote:
Originally posted by stren
they are slow that's fo sho prolly cause of the cold

i'm from Canada, they t'ink i'm slow, eh?

[/simpsons]

Posted by Silky Johnson on Jan-17-2005 21:17:

In other news, yes is winning by twice as many votes. Yes is the popular answer, so it won't be long before everyone jumps on the bandwagon.

FUCK!

Posted by [N]�k|��[Z] on Jan-17-2005 21:18:

i voted no, cos i thought that the thread subliminally questioned.. 'are my productions any good?'

Posted by {b.s.e.} on Jan-17-2005 21:19:

quote:
Originally posted by [N]�k|��[Z]
i voted no, cos i thought that the thread subliminally questioned.. 'are my productions any good?'

it was actually concerning dental care in the UK and whether or not it should be implimented

Pages (2): [1] 2 »