TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Polygamy coming to Canada
Pages (4): [1] 2 3 4 »


Posted by ShadoWolf on Jan-20-2005 17:27:

Evil1 Polygamy coming to Canada

http://www.canada.com/ottawa/ottawa...61-48f0e6390253

Polygamy, the next debate

Government launches urgent study as same-sex unions open door to Charter challenges claiming plural marriages are a religious right

Chris Cobb
The Ottawa Citizen

January 20, 2005
Just weeks before it introduces divisive same-sex marriage legislation, the federal government has launched an urgent study into the legal and social ramifications of polygamy.

Critics say the study underscores a deep concern in the Martin government that legalized homosexual marriage may lead to constitutional challenges from minority groups who claim polygamy as a religious right.
It also suggests that the government is suspicious that multi-marriage is more commonplace in Canada than widely realized. Polygamy, outlawed in Canada but accepted and practised in many countries, typically means a man having several wives at the same time.

"In order to best prepare for possible debate surrounding Canada's polygamy policy, critical research is needed," says a Status of Women Canada document. "It is vital that researchers explore the impacts of polygamy on women and children and gender equality as well as the challenges that polygamy presents to society."

Conservative party justice critic Vic Toews says there is a direct link between the Status of Women concern and the same-sex marriage legislation due to be introduced by the government in February.

"This government understands it has a problem on its hands," said Mr. Toews, a former Manitoba constitutional lawyer. "What they are looking for is evidence to demonstrate that polygamy is inconsistent with Charter and Canadian values. If I was a lawyer prosecuting a polygamist that's the type of evidence I would be looking for."

Sayd Mumtaz Ali, president of the Canadian Society of Muslims, said he opposes same-sex marriage but said if it is legalized in Canada, polygamists would also be within their rights to challenge for their choice of family life to be legalized.

"This is a liberally minded country with regards to equal rights," said Mr. Ali. "And literally millions live common law."

Multiple marriage is legal in most Muslim countries, he said, but a Muslim man who takes more than one wife must prove to a court that he is capable of treating them all equally.

He said he knows of some "but not too many" Muslims who live in Canada with more than one wife but knows of no situation where the wives are unwilling, or unhappy, participants in the arrangement.

But Mr. Ali said he has not detected any significant support among Muslims for a constitutional challenge. "To my knowledge there is no plan to push for this,' he said.

But when same-sex marriage becomes legal, the door will open to more Charter challenges, said Conservative critic Mr. Toews. "Once you change the definition of marriage from one man and one woman and you move to two persons," he said, "what then is the distinction between two persons, or three or more persons? If I was a lawyer defending polygamists, I'd say 'hey this is a constitutional right, a freedom of religion.' Why can't freedom of religion trump this new definition of marriage?"
Lawyer Peter Hogg, who argued the federal government's case for same-sex marriage at the Supreme Court of Canada, said he doubts legalizing homosexual marriage will lead to legal challenges from polygamists.

"We have to recognize that over time society changes and marriage changes to mirror the attitude, mores and needs of a particular society," said Mr Hogg. "If some kind of cataclysm occurred to make women far more numerous than men for a long period of time then a significant movement might develop to change the institution of marriage to reflect that. But that is unlikely."

The fact that bigamy is a crime in Canada is also a huge obstacle for a polygamist launching a Charter of Rights challenge, he said.

"I don't think you can say there are any inexorable steps here," added Mr Hogg. "What has sparked the concern over same-sex marriage is a series of Charter decisions holding that opposite-sex marriage discriminates on the basis of sexual orientation and you can't make arguments of that sort with respect to polygamy."

Status of Women research director Zeynep Karman said yesterday that the study had been prompted by reports of polygamy at the British Columbia community of Bountiful, which is an offshoot of the Mormon Church. She denied same-sex marriage legislation is the motivating factor.

According to reports from several women who have left the community, some Bountiful men have three or more wives and have fathered more than 20 children. They also allege that girls of 14 or 15, raised in what are effectively closed communities, are assigned to marry men who in some cases are 10 to 30 years older.

"There has been quite a bit of interest around this issue," said Ms. Karman, "and we have no good understanding of its scope. It is an issue of women being forced into it, if they are forced into it. At the same time we do not want to alarm or exaggerate. We are just questioning at this point."

Bountiful leaders, currently being investigated by the B.C. government and police, claim that polygamy is allowed in their religion and that under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms they have freedom to practice their religion.

Status of Women's research branch has solicited proposals from universities and other institutions in a detailed document, but mentions only Bountiful as an example of Canadian polygamy.

"There are all kinds of theories that women coming from other cultures, where this is acceptable, must be practicing it," she said, "but we have to be very careful that this will not come up as another way to criticize ethnic groups."

Ms. Karman said she expects up to three or four research groups to be chosen, but conceded too that exposing polygamy in Canada will be difficult because it is illegal and men with more than one wife will be unlikely admit it. "It's a challenge,' she said.

The Status of Women-sponsored research will cost an initial $75,000. The deadline for proposals is Valentine's Day.

Straight Goods: Tory Ads Will Explain Same-Sex Policy, PageA4

� The Ottawa Citizen 2005





Posted by ShadoWolf on Jan-20-2005 17:29:

Once you destroy the traditional family, you open the door to all sorts of perversions.


http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...threadid=236336






Polygamy, of course, is being used to court the Muslim vote in Toronto.

LIEBERALS OUT NOW!!


Posted by j_spot on Jan-20-2005 17:44:

traditional in what sense?
traditional to WASPs?

before I used to think your hatred for liberals was based on political ideals...you are looking more and more ultra right wing moral conservative. Which just as scary, if not more scary than a left winger.

Id be in agreeance with allowing polygamy. Why not? And the case of 14 year olds being married to 30 year olds is not valid argument to stop the activity. That is not the norm, and that individual group has problems, not the ideal of polygamy.


Posted by Yohan on Jan-20-2005 17:50:

What about a woman taking multiple husbands?


Posted by ShadoWolf on Jan-20-2005 18:02:

Thumbs down

quote:
Originally posted by j_spot
traditional in what sense?
traditional to WASPs?


To all humans, as sexual reproduction requires a man and a woman.



quote:
Id be in agreeance with allowing polygamy. Why not?


Should I be allowed to marry my cousin?

What if I wanted to marry Lassie, a golden retriever?


Posted by dEsidEL on Jan-20-2005 18:02:

Re: Polygamy coming to Canada

quote:
Originally posted by ShadoWolf









bwahahahaha .. lucky SOB


Posted by Jayx1 on Jan-20-2005 18:03:

imagine being nagged by 6 wives instead of one!!

Oh God!!


Posted by starsearcher on Jan-20-2005 18:03:

I think this is more of a women's rights issue rather than a marriage issue. I don't care about the fact the guy has many wives it's about the way that his wives are treated Not a political issue either


Posted by Jayx1 on Jan-20-2005 18:07:

quote:
Originally posted by starsearcher
I think this is more of a women's rights issue rather than a marriage issue. I don't care about the fact the guy has many wives it's about the way that his wives are treated Not a political issue either


i have to agree that if we allow polygamy then we might as well just dissolve the whole idea of marriage. Scrap all laws that legally define marriage including allomony and property redistribution and let it be just a religious ceremony with no legal binding. This is the only way we can appease those who would like to marry their cat.

Go ahead and marry your cat, the law wont recognize it!


Posted by starsearcher on Jan-20-2005 18:08:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
i have to agree that if we allow polygamy then we might as well just dissolve the whole idea of marriage. Scrap all laws that legally define marriage including allomony and property redistribution and let it be just a religious ceremony with no legal binding. This is the only way we can appease those who would like to marry their cat.

Go ahead and marry your cat, the law wont recognize it!



Some guy in the states tried to marry his car - ford mustang freaks


Posted by malek on Jan-20-2005 18:11:

this is crazy


Posted by j_spot on Jan-20-2005 18:12:

quote:
Originally posted by ShadoWolf
To all humans, as sexual reproduction requires a man and a woman.





Should I be allowed to marry my cousin?

What if I wanted to marry Lassie, a golden retriever?


WASP=white anglo saxon protestant, it was in reference to your comment RE:Traditional family. Other cultures accept polygamy as part of the family.

and yea sure you could mary your cousin. I dont see any legal standing for why not. Morally I dont agree with it, but love is love. Reproducing however is another question. chance of birth defects are high, but weve already decided that state sterilization of people who have high chances of passing on birth defects is illegal, so nothing to do here.
legally right, morally wrong.

dog no. human to human. last time I checked we still didnt give legal standing to chimps who can consent. I doubt your dog is of higher standing than a primate.


Posted by starsearcher on Jan-20-2005 18:13:


Posted by ShadoWolf on Jan-20-2005 18:23:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
Go ahead and marry your cat, the law wont recognize it!


If I want to marry Fluffy, I should be able to!! You fundies need to stop telling me what to do - I have rights!!!!!!11








Two men getting married is equivalent to a man marrying a cat. No matter how many times you take it up the ass, or get "fluffed" by Fluffy, you can't make a baby.


Marriage is the union between one man and one woman as husband and wife. That's the way it's always been because that's what's natural.


Posted by j_spot on Jan-20-2005 18:30:

k church boy

to you marriage is about reproduction
to me its about love between two people.

and ill debate that natural state of marriage you claim.


Posted by starsearcher on Jan-20-2005 18:30:

quote:
Originally posted by ShadoWolf
If I want to marry Fluffy, I should be able to!! You fundies need to stop telling me what to do - I have rights!!!!!!11








Two men getting married is equivalent to a man marrying a cat. No matter how many times you take it up the ass, or get "fluffed" by Fluffy, you can't make a baby.


Marriage is the union between one man and one woman as husband and wife. That's the way it's always been because that's what's natural.




WTF are these cats eating?!?!


Any just for the record that's not how it's always bee...if not for christianity and mass religion in general we'd still have little boys with grown men...learn some history young man especially Greek history, and the history of those times....


Posted by ShadoWolf on Jan-20-2005 18:39:

quote:
Originally posted by starsearcher
Any just for the record that's not how it's always bee...if not for christianity and mass religion in general we'd still have little boys with grown men...learn some history young man especially Greek history, and the history of those times....


Such perversions only happen when cultures become too decadent. I can assure you that cave men did not get with cave boys.


Posted by j_spot on Jan-20-2005 18:42:

quote:
Originally posted by ShadoWolf
Such perversions only happen when cultures become too decadent. I can assure you that cave men did not get with cave boys.

actually you CANT assure us that it didnt

Platos Symposium is widely regarded as the most comprehensive reading on the subject of love. However the entire time, it speaks of HOMOSEXUAL sex between old me and little boys saying that this is the best form of love.

your views are deeply based in christian and catholic tradition, so stop trying to seem like they arent.


Posted by baystreetboi on Jan-20-2005 18:42:

quote:
Originally posted by ShadoWolf


Two men getting married is equivalent to a man marrying a cat. No matter how many times you take it up the ass, or get "fluffed" by Fluffy, you can't make a baby.


Marriage is the union between one man and one woman as husband and wife. That's the way it's always been because that's what's natural.


The logical extension of this argument then is that impotent men or women who have had hysterectomies should not be allowed to marry either. Would you support this?


Posted by starsearcher on Jan-20-2005 18:44:

quote:
Originally posted by j_spot
actually you CANT assure us that it didnt

Platos Symposium is widely regarded as the most comprehensive reading on the subject of love. However the entire time, it speaks of HOMOSEXUAL sex between old me and little boys saying that this is the best form of love.

your views are deeply based in christian and catholic tradition, so stop trying to seem like they arent.



did you ever take the course of philosophy of love and sex...haha that's where I leared that from

That whole course was fucked...either way though...for sure you are correct...women throughout history were seen mosly fit only for the purposes of making kids and "housework" until recently nothing natural about that


Posted by starsearcher on Jan-20-2005 18:44:

By the way...are you saying that people who have kids but don't marry are ilegitimate?


Posted by j_spot on Jan-20-2005 18:45:

Im taking philosophy of sexuality right now.
just read the symposium. in fact, ive got to go to class in about 10 minutes here.


Posted by starsearcher on Jan-20-2005 18:47:

quote:
Originally posted by j_spot
Im taking philosophy of sexuality right now.
just read the symposium. in fact, ive got to go to class in about 10 minutes here.


nice!

What school/prof do you go to/have?


Posted by j_spot on Jan-20-2005 18:48:

UofT, de sousa


Posted by starsearcher on Jan-20-2005 18:49:

King

quote:
Originally posted by j_spot
UofT, de sousa


Ah ok I took the same course and I'm at Ryerson...
So far looks it's the same topics of dicussion...good luck!


Pages (4): [1] 2 3 4 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.