TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Mastering Problem (+Pics)
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »


Posted by Shahar on Jan-23-2005 15:45:

Mastering Problem (+Pics)

I'm using Reason 2.5, my melody included 2 channels.
it looks like this:



I've already set the channels volume to be lower and lower (as you can see in the picture), and it's still looks too high on the master-channel. What can I do to fix that?


Posted by Subtle on Jan-23-2005 15:53:

lower the master channel.. then maxzimise the whole in a audio editor..


Posted by Shahar on Jan-23-2005 15:58:

quote:
Originally posted by Subtle
lower the master channel.. then maxzimise the whole in a audio editor..


Audio editor like 'Wavelab' ?! how can I maximize it there?


Posted by DickieThijssen on Jan-23-2005 16:12:

first compress/eq it (if you want to) then use the normalize (to 100%) effect


Posted by thecYrus on Jan-23-2005 16:23:

1. never use normalize (use compressing and limiting instead)
2. if the master-channel clips you have to lower the single channels until nothing clips anymore!
3. the master channel can go higher than the single channel-levels because sound in the same frequency will be added together. if you have a huge differnece it's most due the lack of bad equalising.

just my 2 cents

cYrus


Posted by MadThijs on Jan-23-2005 16:23:

I see you have some room left so just lower channel 1-5 with about 50-60. Then your balance is still the same but your not clipping the output. If it still clips you should chek the master levels at the sources(synth, sampler etc.) and lower each device with the same amount.

You could begin a new track with the masterfader at 127 and keep the channels from clipping.


Posted by Shahar on Jan-23-2005 16:31:

quote:
Originally posted by thecYrus
1. never use normalize (use compressing and limiting instead)
2. if the master-channel clips you have to lower the single channels until nothing clips anymore!
3. the master channel can go higher than the single channel-levels because sound in the same frequency will be added together. if you have a huge differnece it's most due the lack of bad equalising.

just my 2 cents

cYrus


I'm using 1 compressor and 1 eq per channel.. it's ok?

I can post here my compressors and eqs settings so you can check if it's ok or not..


Posted by Shahar on Jan-23-2005 17:09:

My compressors\eqs look like this: (first comp\eq go to the first melody channel, second comp\eq go to the second channel)


Posted by Rob on Jan-23-2005 17:23:

-sigh- The first thing they teach you is to never let the peak of a channel signal go beyond the fader's Odb reference:



See how each channel never peaks beyond the faders?

Yours should be looking something like this:


So lower the channels volumn source and then bring those faders up
damnit


Posted by Rob on Jan-23-2005 17:30:

It doesn't matter what settings you have on your compressors and eqs. Just make sure you don't get any audiable clipping.


Posted by Shahar on Jan-23-2005 18:38:

quote:
Originally posted by Rob
So lower the channels volumn source and then bring those faders up
damnit


Sorry bout my ignorance, but what is 'the-channels-volumn-source' ??


Posted by Limit on Jan-23-2005 18:48:

dude listen YOU DON'T NEED TO COMPRESS LEADS!! there is no purpose for this just makes them a big disaster(unless you purposely want to). Going a little over 0db is ok but I'm mean small amounts like to 3 or 4 maybe. Start off with mutting all your tracks...then start by engaging each channel one by one...but be analytical about it and watch the levels to see where each one is at...so one by one you can see which channesl are in the red and reduce them...then after each one is done check your master and see where your at from there...also you might want to eq all the sounds that don't need and low end and roll it off..like hats and fx, ect...also do the same to teh ones that only need low end and so on. This will improve the mix and may help you with clipping.


Posted by Shahar on Jan-23-2005 18:52:

Ok, I've just set the volume to be lower, now it just looks like this:


Posted by RIPassion on Jan-23-2005 19:47:

Ok:

I'm assuming that mixer is the only mixer for your track.

In the bottom righthand corner of each maelstrom is a master volume control, and there are also volume faders per OSC next to each OSC. Set those accordingly, and then go to your main mixer. Each device (redrum, nn19, etc.) has a master volume control. Use it.

If you think you have the 'ratio' correct between all your channels and the master is clipping... turn the master down until it doesn't clip?


Posted by Shahar on Jan-23-2005 20:17:

quote:
Originally posted by RIPassion
Ok:

I'm assuming that mixer is the only mixer for your track.

In the bottom righthand corner of each maelstrom is a master volume control, and there are also volume faders per OSC next to each OSC. Set those accordingly, and then go to your main mixer. Each device (redrum, nn19, etc.) has a master volume control. Use it.

If you think you have the 'ratio' correct between all your channels and the master is clipping... turn the master down until it doesn't clip?


Sorry I didnt understand you dude...can u explain it again step by step?


Posted by MadThijs on Jan-23-2005 21:50:

quote:
Originally posted by Shahar
Ok, I've just set the volume to be lower, now it just looks like this:



Ok now put the master on 127 and find a amount for each channel which'll not clip the output. So add 10 to each channel and see if it clips etc.


Posted by thecYrus on Jan-23-2005 22:01:

you don't need to get to the maximum output level before the mixdown. that's something for the mastering procedure and will be made in a audio-editor. just get enough headroom before you export the tune, so you can still compress and limit it proper in the editor.


Posted by MadThijs on Jan-23-2005 22:13:

If you don't mind you have less dynamic, this works. I like to use the maximum output. What's your preference 127 steps for volume or only 80.
Most producers here won't mind though.


Posted by Shahar on Jan-23-2005 22:20:

guys,
I dont like the ratio between the first melody channel (scream1) and the second (eq2)...but if ill change the ratio, it will clip the output...how can I keep the ratio?


Posted by MadThijs on Jan-23-2005 23:15:

What do you mean with ratio here. Explain what you mean by "the ratio between".


Posted by Shahar on Jan-23-2005 23:59:

quote:
Originally posted by MadThijs
What do you mean with ratio here. Explain what you mean by "the ratio between".


The volume level of first melody channel should be 10 steps lower than the second melody channel. like: ch1 = 50, ch2 = 60

but I cant to that coz channel 2 will clip the output...


Posted by Beyer on Jan-24-2005 01:40:

You should add a limiter or a compressor to the master channel in order to keep it tidy. I usually don't compress the masterchannel anymore, I rather limit it to -4dB, and normalize it in a wave editor. When I limit the master instead of compressing it, I find that I will retain the levels on all parts throughout the track, instead of stuff getting blurry as more and more stuff comes in. (not an eq issue).

I'm new to this too, so no flaming plz!


Posted by Shahar on Jan-24-2005 03:19:

quote:
Originally posted by Beijer
You should add a limiter or a compressor to the master channel in order to keep it tidy. I usually don't compress the masterchannel anymore, I rather limit it to -4dB, and normalize it in a wave editor. When I limit the master instead of compressing it, I find that I will retain the levels on all parts throughout the track, instead of stuff getting blurry as more and more stuff comes in. (not an eq issue).

I'm new to this too, so no flaming plz!


when you say 'add limiter or compressor to the master' u mean to the mixer master or to the nn-19 master?


btw, every synth im using has a compressor..it's ok?


Posted by Rob on Jan-24-2005 07:51:

quote:
Originally posted by Shahar
The volume level of first melody channel should be 10 steps lower than the second melody channel. like: ch1 = 50, ch2 = 60

but I cant to that coz channel 2 will clip the output...


That's why you need a compressor on the master and possibly even on the lead. Why do you need to compress a lead? Well trance is definitly not a genre where the lead has alot of dynamic range, so you'll want to decrease that dynamic range and most importantly stop it from any having abrupt spikes or peaks(especially the case when you layer lots of leads together to make 1 phat lead).

Anyway, back to your problem. Try and set this up(wait a while for it to load as it's animated ):




Notice how when I increase the volumn of lead1, the compressor(really a limiter as it's set to the highest ratio) kicks in and compresses the signal source. Result = well set it up yourself and listen to what it does.


Posted by h.vox on Jan-24-2005 08:44:

Re: Mastering Problem (+Pics)

quote:
Originally posted by Shahar
I'm using Reason 2.5, my melody included 2 channels.
it looks like this:



I've already set the channels volume to be lower and lower (as you can see in the picture), and it's still looks too high on the master-channel. What can I do to fix that?


well it looks like this 'eq2' channel is too loud even thougs its fader is pretty low. it looks like you used one hell of a boost with that eq - instead boosting the frequency range, try cutting other ranges and setting the volume afterwards. i suppose that channel is too loud anyway the way it is now. after setting levels right, get your master fader down, render to wave, and normalize afterwards in wavelab, cooledit, soundforge, or whatever you are using.


Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.