TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- ACTION ALERT - Law of the Sea Treaty

ACTION ALERT - Law of the Sea Treaty

ACTION ALERT

January 27, 2005


Now that the elections are over, the politicians and special interests in Washington will feel free to do what they want -- ignore public opinion -- unless we convince them otherwise.

Senator Richard Lugar, chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, wants the U.S. Senate to ratify the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) as soon as possible. Lobbyists representing multi-national corporations are busy convincing U.S. senators to vote in favor of LOST, and well-funded think tanks are holding briefings to marshal support for ratification.

Let's remember that over 20 years ago President Reagan opposed LOST. So what has changed since then? The treaty is the same. What has changed are the politicians who are now in power, and we must convince them to reject LOST.

Frank Gaffney writes, "It [LOST] was drafted more than 20 years ago at the behest of Soviet Bloc and 'nonaligned' nations as the centerpiece of their so-called 'New International Economic Order,' a scheme to transfer wealth from the industralized to the developing world.

"Ronald Reagan objected to LOST's creation of a supranational agency to govern the world's oceans at the expense of U.S. sovereignty...."

Last year, supporters of LOST tried to quietly get the treaty ratified. They were confident they could. But word got out and Americans throughout the country said "NO!" This sudden outburst of opposition caught the pro-LOST folks by surprise. They decided then, in that election year, to hold back and try again early this year.

And that is exactly what they are doing now...working to get LOST ratified once and for all.

We expect the Senate to vote on ratification of LOST within the next 60 days, maybe sooner. We must, once again, rally opposition and do so quickly.

Urge your two U.S. senators to vote against ratification of LOST. In addition, please spread the word. We will need all the help we can get this time around.

Send Your Message
http://capwiz.com/liberty/issues/al...6868141&type=CO

Background on LOST
http://www.thelibertycommittee.org/lost.htm

Thank you for your help!

Kent Snyder
The Liberty Committee
http://www.thelibertycommittee.org

No way. When the US Navy moves, all other ships need to move the f*ck out of the way, period. They rule the seas and don't need to veer for no ships flagged with a major power or some damn third world country for sure.


[[[smoke]]]

I am for it... :shrug:

I like how there is no mention in the article at all regarding what LOST is not even a clue.

Sort of reminds me of that TV show...

quote:

Originally posted by Yoepus I like how there is no mention in the article at all regarding what LOST is not even a clue. Sort of reminds me of that TV show...

It was actually an email, but it does appear as though the meaning of LOST was only insinuated. Try the links, or even better try this one:

http://www.cato.org/dailys/03-12-04.html

I suscribe strongly to the International Law theory on world order. Besides if you sovereignty buffs are so concerned, the US can break the damn thing whenever they feel like it. They do it with practically every other International Law accord they have ever signed.

quote:

Originally posted by Trancer-X It was actually an email, but it does appear as though the meaning of LOST was only insinuated. Try the links, or even better try this one: http://www.cato.org/dailys/03-12-04.html

i believe this link would lead us to the meaning of LOST...

it's reading time!

quote:

Originally posted by Itarill� i believe this link would lead us to the meaning of LOST...

I'd rather be beat.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.