TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- How would you answer this Interview Question/Job Application?
Pages (2): [1] 2 »

How would you answer this Interview Question/Job Application?

F o l l o w i n g a c h a n g e i n t h e U S'
C o n s t i t u t i o n , p r e s i d e n t s a r e
a l l o w e d t o s t a n d f o r a 3 r d t e r m o f
o f f i c e.

Y o u h a v e b e e n a p p o i n t e d G e o r g e
B u s h ' s c a m p a i g n m a n a g e r a n d h a v e
b e e n a s k e d t o p r e p a r e a 2 5 0
w o r d s u m m a r y o f y o u r c a m p a i g n
s t r a t e g y .



I'm a 23 year old trying to get a job as a solicitor (the English equivalent of a US lawyer). That's what I've been asked to do to reach the final stage to get the job. I've already had a few interviews with the firm, passed the first stages and I think my chances are good. But i really need someone who knows about politics to help me...my knowledge is very limited.

The issues I was thinking of addressing are:

- the kyoto protocol
- G8 summit
- the weakened relationship with Europe and the relationship between Bush and Blair
- War on iran/Iraq/Terrorism
- israel/Palestine

Problem is that 250 words is very little. There is no way i could cover all those issues in depth to make my submission even half decent.

I would SERIOUSLY APPRECIATE any contributions and am extremely grateful for any help. No matter how small.

Thanks.

Here's what I have so far

'The last election was a close call and it is clear the outskirts of the United States remain highly opposed to our Administration. Without alienating our support from Middle America, it appears there is little that can be done to convince the US coastline that it is not a paternalistic body that oppresses the notion of liberalism. That being said, the recent Iraqi election was viewed as success by even those who were abhorred by the US led war on Iraq; a simple case of the �end justifying the means�.

Any changes in the policies of the Administration must be de minimus. The salient argument why Kerry was not successful last time round was that because his polices were too wishy-washy; he was a man without focus. This strategy does fit with the Middle American mind that seeks guidance and direction.'


Thats already 150 words!

Wouldn't it be better if you talked about the things you know the best?

This way they'd know what you're interested on and your communication skills. If they liked you so far, I'd say "be yourself"

quote:

Originally posted by Lira Wouldn't it be better if you talked about the things you know the best? This way they'd know what you're interested on and your communication skills. If they liked you so far, I'd say "be yourself"

I don't quite know what you mean by that. I'm not allowed to be myself. I've got to be Bush's campaign manager. I've got to put myslf in his shoes and come up with a 250 word report.

Your goal should be to convince the people that electing a new leader would destabilize the war on terror b/c the military would have to get used to the new leader. Also state the process you are making towards bringing social security back within budget limits. Remind the people of the money u put in their pockets from tax cuts.

quote:

Originally posted by d-jay MyTH I don't quite know what you mean by that. I'm not allowed to be myself. I've got to be Bush's campaign manager. I've got to put myslf in his shoes and come up with a 250 word report.

O h I s k i p p e d t h a t p a r t

quote:

Originally posted by d-jay MyTH Here's what I have so far 'The last election was a close call and it is clear the outskirts of the United States remain highly opposed to our Administration. Without alienating our support from Middle America, it appears there is little that can be done to convince the US coastline that it is not a paternalistic body that oppresses the notion of liberalism. That being said, the recent Iraqi election was viewed as success by even those who were abhorred by the US led war on Iraq; a simple case of the �end justifying the means�. Any changes in the policies of the Administration must be de minimus. The salient argument why Kerry was not successful last time round was that because his polices were too wishy-washy; he was a man without focus. This strategy does fit with the Middle American mind that seeks guidance and direction.' Thats already 150 words!

Too negative and there's no need to mention what happened with Kerry; that's obvious.
Since the Bush campaign has obviously been doing a good job already there should be more focus on the future, not justifying the past. (Argue that point if you will but the fact of the matter is, he is the man in office).

Since you're limited in words you should probably have an unlying leadership theme for the whole campaign as opposed to trying to name every current issue; a sense of direction in what the campaign has to offer domestically and abroad.
There's no way 250 words could possibily do even one subject justice, so to avoid lacking depth in the campaign mention specific goals that a leader would take.
(I know it sounds like I'm contradicting myself but the thought is, use leadership as the theme; leaders have goals)
The world is always in need of good leadership and direction.
Creating a clear vision for everyone else to understand and agree to is always a hard task.

Best of luck with that.

Don't forget who your audience is - the American voters.
Do what works - promote W's character - sabatoge the other guy who's running's character.

quote:

Originally posted by Lira O h I s k i p p e d t h a t p a r t

yeah i apoligise about that. that's a formatting thing and it would take ages to individually fix each space so i just had to leave it as it was in the end.



Thanks to eveyone who has replied so far. Please keep it coming - I really want this job.


Also can i just clarify that in case there is any confusion: From what I can gather, given that I have to write a 'strategy', my feeling is that this report would be for internal use only and is not for the eyes of the american public. Therefore its content will be more than tactics as opposed to focusing on the individual policies. yes? (Hence why I have written about the american public in 3rd person). Does everyone else agree?

Also, does anyone else know where else I could post this question....I need all the input I can get.

My plan would be to play on fears.

1) Plenty terror alerts (changing the "terror" level up and down alot)

2) Make up some form of new financial plan (rehash something...) make it sound like the last best hope

3) As you say don't change any desisions after they are made


....business as usual

^--- Brilliant

quote:

Originally posted by Dervish My plan would be to play on fears. 1) Plenty terror alerts (changing the "terror" level up and down alot) 2) Make up some form of new financial plan (rehash something...) make it sound like the last best hope 3) As you say don't change any desisions after they are made ....business as usual

You forgot God! You've got to include God!

d-jay MyTH

first, when is it due? this is critical to know.

second, what matters in this essay is not what you argue/conclude/propose etc. but how you do it (reason analysis, structure your answer etc.) there is no correct or sure-fire answer (if there were, you'd be able to command premium dollars for consultancy) if this point is obvious to you, i apologize.

finally, given everything above, focus on structuring your argument around campaign themes that will gaurantee that you win the electoral college. in other words, what you rite about (your campaign strategy) must focus on winning the electoral college. i know this is a little vague but post a reply if i can help more.

quote:

Originally posted by Arbiter You forgot God! You've got to include God!

Aww shit he's the best part as well. He likes Bush so much he even let him win when he had less votes first time round. Maybe theres a campaign slogan in that actually. Maybe add a "buddy jesus" at the side pointing at Bush and saying "Looking Good George, Looking Good". Nearly forgot have Bush in his Pilot Suit again, use plenty of aircraft carriers too they're cool so he'll look cool.

quote:

Originally posted by Spacey Orange d-jay MyTH first, when is it due? this is critical to know. second, what matters in this essay is not what you argue/conclude/propose etc. but how you do it (reason analysis, structure your answer etc.) there is no correct or sure-fire answer (if there were, you'd be able to command premium dollars for consultancy) if this point is obvious to you, i apologize. finally, given everything above, focus on structuring your argument around campaign themes that will gaurantee that you win the electoral college. in other words, what you rite about (your campaign strategy) must focus on winning the electoral college. i know this is a little vague but post a reply if i can help more.

Its due to be posted by 20 Feb so I'm hoping to get it done by this weekend.

I did find your post a bit vague...can u explain it to this dum englishman?

Thanks

What he's basicly saying is it ain't what you do it's how you do it.

Be analitical and systematic.

He's also saying focus on the sysytem your playing, the electoral college. I.e. swing states and so on.

quote:

Originally posted by Dervish What he's basicly saying is it ain't what you do it's how you do it. Be analitical and systematic. He's also saying focus on the sysytem your playing, the electoral college. I.e. swing states and so on.

I just want to check i understand what the electoral college is? can someone clarify?

LINK

But you'd probebly want to look more into swing states and stuff like that to be tactical rather than know every detail.

LINK

have a look at the results and analysis of the last and second last results too to get a better idea.

sorry about my earlier reply if it was long-winded.
let me be more the point.

the assignment is testing your ability to look at a problem or goal, reason, analyze, organize your thoughts and response, come to a definitive conclusion, and to be succinct about it. the more succint, the better.

your goal as a GWB's campaign manager is to win the election, which means he has to get 270 electoral votes. you, therefore, have to discuss how you're going to get those 270 electoral votes. what states will you focus on? on all or only some? what issues will you emphasize? how much time will you spend campagining in some states? how much money will you spend in them? what criteria will you use to determine where to spend the time and money? and so forth. . .

there's tons you can write about but remember about the point of the task. maybe post a brief outline of the paper?

Although even pretending to help George Bush get re-elected makes me sick to the stomach, see if this helps at all:


Mr. Bush,

Over the past eight years, under your leadership, we have seen the Republican party grow significantly in strength and popularity. Your swift military and legislative responses to the September 11th terrorist attacks inspired a feeling of security amongst the American people during a period of great uncertainty and your subsequent tax-cuts almost certainly succeeded in averting what would have been a costly economic recession. It is my belief that the actions you have undertaken in the name of protecting the wellbeing of our citizens have succeeded in securing a stronger, more confident nation than at any other time in living memory. The American people acknowledged your acheivements and your visions for the future during the last election and the record number of votes cast for your name constitutes a vote of confidence, from the American people to you, both for the job you have done and for the tasks you have promised to undertake. However, despite your hitherto unquestionable success in reaching out to the electorate, there is still yet more to be done.

It should not be forgotten that both of your election victories to date have been quite narrow and that there are still many who remain skeptical about the progress you have made. While it is important that you continue to be seen as a man of unwavering value and principle, we must resolve to do more to reach out to those on all sides of the political divide in order to ensure victory in the coming election.

Ethnic citizens, for instance, continue to vote overwhelmingly for the Democratic Party and represent a large (and continually growing) part of the voting bloc. I believe it is essential that we do more to appeal to these voters during the coming campaign and highlight the significant social progresses that they have benefitted from under your leadership. We can point inititives that you have spear-headed, including:

• Awarding drivers licences and welfare to illegal immigrants (who are primarily of Mexican decent).
  
• Your commitment to an ethical doctrine that may appeal to the conservative nature of many Latin-American Catholics.
  
• The party's rich history of defending civil rights (such as Lincoln's abolishion of slavery).
  
• The appointment of ethnic Americans (Alberto Gonzales, Condi Rice etc.) to positions of authority within the government.
  
• A continuing improvement in the economic and social welfare of all ethnic citizens within the US.

quote:

Originally posted by Renegade And god do I feel dirty for writing it. )

Based upon the behavioral principle that extreme homophobic tendencies can be indicative of homosexual self-repression, I shall theorize that Renegade satisfied a deeply held fetish by writing his ode to Bush.

quote:

Originally posted by Renegade Although even pretending to help George Bush get re-elected makes me sick to the stomach, see if this helps at all: Mr. Bush, Over the past eight years, under your leadership, we have seen the Republican party grow significantly in strength and popularity. Your swift military and legislative responses to the September 11th terrorist attacks inspired a feeling of security amongst the American people during a period of great uncertainty and your subsequent tax-cuts almost certainly succeeded in averting what would have been a costly economic recession. It is my belief that the actions you have undertaken in the name of protecting the wellbeing of our citizens have succeeded in securing a stronger, more confident nation than at any other time in living memory. The American people acknowledged your acheivements and your visions for the future during the last election and the record number of votes cast for your name constitutes a vote of confidence, from the American people to you, both for the job you have done and for the tasks you have promised to undertake. However, despite your hitherto unquestionable success in reaching out to the electorate, there is still yet more to be done. It should not be forgotten that both of your election victories to date have been quite narrow and that there are still many who remain skeptical about the progress you have made. While it is important that you continue to be seen as a man of unwavering value and principle, we must resolve to do more to reach out to those on all sides of the political divide in order to ensure victory in the coming election. Ethnic citizens, for instance, continue to vote overwhelmingly for the Democratic Party and represent a large (and continually growing) part of the voting bloc. I believe it is essential that we do more to appeal to these voters during the coming campaign and highlight the significant social progresses that they have benefitted from under your leadership. We can point inititives that you have spear-headed, including: Awarding drivers licences and welfare to illegal immigrants (who are primarily of Mexican decent). Your commitment to an ethical doctrine that may appeal to the conservative nature of many Latin-American Catholics. The party's rich history of defending civil rights (such as Lincoln's abolishion of slavery). The appointment of ethnic Americans (Alberto Gonzales, Condi Rice etc.) to positions of authority within the government. A continuing improvement in the economic and social welfare of all ethnic citizens within the US. Additionally, during the last election campain, the "liberation of Iraq" was a major issue and many who voted against you did so under the belief that the war was not worth the economic costs incurred, nor worth the tragic deaths of our own brave soldiers sustained there. It is important that we continue to emphasise the positives of this conflict, drive home the significance of the free-elections we were recently able to oversee there and to explain just how vital a free, prosperous Iraq is for the continuing security of this nation. Economically, many are apprehensive about the growing budget deficit and it is important that we go to great lengths to assuage their fears. Explain that we are striving to reduce this deficit over the coming years and detail the extensive policies we have created and implemented to fulfill this goal. While pointing to the continuing economic growth you have overseen, emphasise that securing the nation from those who seek to do it harm is not a cheap endeavour and that no cost can be spared in preserving the lives of every American citizen. Simply, we need to ensure that the electorate is aware that we are taking steps to restore budgetary parity, but the deficits currently being sustained are being done so in the pursuit of worthy goals. In short, while there are still many left to be convinced, you stand as one of the most popular presidents of the modern era and your record speaks for itself. While we must not forget the people that helped to get us here and must continue to pursue the policies and goals that have made your presidency such a great success up to this point, we must also be mindful of breaching the sharp dichotemy between those who support you and those who remain skeptical. By emphasising the successes you've overseen during your time in the White House, I believe that this can be done. Yours sincerely, Renegade. (A bit long, but you get the picture. And god do I feel dirty for writing it. )

Whilst that's about 500 words over the limit. That's very helpful and i particularly like the bit about the budget deficit. I think i could also cite that as a reason as to why the US will not sign up for the Kyoto protocol...it wants to stabalise the economy first and there are fears that kyoto protocol would halt economic development.

Or do you think the voters care about the kyoto proto anyway?

Could I have the American perspective on this one?.....Has the
kyoto protocol been a big issue over there? has it had much coverage?

Thanks to those posting....you've been graet so far. I think with your continued help I should be able to nail it this weekend

quote:

Originally posted by Renegade (A bit long, but you get the picture. And god do I feel dirty for writing it. )

then why dont j00 have teh showar and clean yourself including your pen0r

Could I have the American perspective on this one?.....Has the kyoto protocol been a big issue over there? has it had much coverage?




Thanks

quote:

Originally posted by occrider Based upon the behavioral principle that extreme homophobic tendencies can be indicative of homosexual self-repression, I shall theorize that Renegade satisfied a deeply held fetish by writing his ode to Bush.

Are you trying to say that I have a sexual attraction to George Bush...?

(Seriously though, I don't know how those pictures ended up on my desktop.)

quote:

Originally posted by Philby then why dont j00 have teh showar and clean yourself including your pen0r

You know what's disturbing to me? Like really, really disturbing? When I was asleep, in my nice warm bed on Wednesday morning, you were imagining me, being naked, in the shower, rubbing my tremendously large cock. You do realise that I'll never be able to sleep comfortably ever again, right?

(Why weren't you at Holden you silly bastard?)

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.