TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- US airports had warnings of 9/11
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by shaolin_Z on Feb-11-2005 05:57:

US airports had warnings of 9/11

declassify those damn reports!


quote:
US airports had warnings of 9/11

Aviation officials in the US had numerous indications that airlines might be hijacked in the run-up to the 11 September attacks, it has emerged.
The Federal Aviation Administration received 52 intelligence reports on al-Qaeda, says the commission that investigated the 2001 attacks.

The reports included five that mentioned hijackings and two that mentioned suicide operations.

But the FAA said the information could not have helped prevent the attacks.

Spokeswoman Laura Brown said: "We had no specific information about means or methods that would have enabled us to tailor any counter-measures."

I'm just appalled that this was withheld... it contributes to the conspiracy theories

Carol Ashley
Mother of 9/11 victim
The report by the 11 September Commission, parts of which were published last July, said the dozens of warnings came in the five months before the attacks took place.

The document was made available by the National Archives on Thursday, after being reported by the New York Times.

It said there was a "striking" false sense of security at the FAA.

"Intelligence that indicated a real and growing threat leading up to 11 September did not stimulate significant increases in security procedures," the report said.

It said airline congestion, delays and financial problems in the industry appeared to be more pressing concerns for FAA officials than the possibility of a terrorist attack.

Declassification delay

FAA spokeswoman Ms Brown said the agency did take action on the intelligence reports, passing them on to airlines and airports.

She said the agency was tightening security at the time of the attacks, "spending $100m a year to deploy explosive detection equipment at the airports", and preparing improved screening measures.

A member of the 11 September Commission said the release of the document had been delayed while it went through a declassification procedure.

But Carol Ashley, whose daughter died in the attacks, said the report should have been released sooner.

"I'm just appalled that this was withheld. That contributes to the idea that the government knew something and didn't act, it contributes to the conspiracy theories out there.

"We need to rebut those with the actual facts, but we need the facts to do that," she said.



http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4255755.stm


Posted by wolverine16 on Feb-11-2005 07:37:

It's gonna get even worse. The bloggers, like Daily Kos, are reporting that the Austrailian press is already publishing some declassified documents that show on January 25, 2001 Richard Clarke sent a pretty clear memo to Condi that requested a meeting because of the serious dangers Al Qaeda was presenting. This info is in addition to the PDB mentioned in the 9/11 commission testimony.

LINK


Posted by TheVrk on Feb-11-2005 20:05:

NONE of this surprises me, only confirms it further


Posted by MisterOpus1 on Feb-11-2005 20:12:

quote:
Originally posted by wolverine16
It's gonna get even worse. The bloggers, like Daily Kos, are reporting that the Austrailian press is already publishing some declassified documents that show on January 25, 2001 Richard Clarke sent a pretty clear memo to Condi that requested a meeting because of the serious dangers Al Qaeda was presenting. This info is in addition to the PDB mentioned in the 9/11 commission testimony.

LINK


Crap, just started a new thread on this...


Posted by Trancer-X on Feb-11-2005 20:59:

http://www.sfgate.com/today/0912_chron_mnreport.shtml


Posted by Q5echo on Feb-11-2005 21:44:

i wonder how many Al-Qeada reports the FAA has recieved since then/or in any given month?

debunking facts are just reported in the article provided alone, yet you guys still let it appeal to your emotions pre-concieved or not. you let it reach into your imaginations then assume you couldn't be more right in your assumptions.

for me, it's like watching people watch soap operas.

i will not reply to your flawed rebuttlals


Posted by Trancer-X on Feb-11-2005 21:59:

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
i wonder how many Al-Qeada reports the FAA has recieved since then/or in any given month?

debunking facts are just reported in the article provided alone, yet you guys still let it appeal to your emotions pre-concieved or not. you let it reach into your imaginations then assume you couldn't be more right in your assumptions.

for me, it's like watching people watch soap operas.

i will not reply to your flawed rebuttlals






edit: links fixed


Posted by Trancer-X on Feb-11-2005 22:08:

quote:
Originally posted by Trancer-X
    (Further information about the actions taken to block my exposure of the criminal activities and the involvement of federal judges can be found in a pending federal lawsuit at the Internet site: www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_reno.html.


That site is down.

Try this instead:


http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2002/04/121418_comment.php


Posted by shaolin_Z on Feb-12-2005 02:43:

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
yet you guys still let it appeal to your emotions pre-concieved or not. you let it reach into your imaginations then assume you couldn't be more right in your assumptions.


that's pretty funny coming from a bush supporter considering all the evidence out there reflecting the fact that he's a lying scumbag and a corrupt a-hole
quote:

i will not reply to your flawed rebuttlals

that's ok. you won't be missed.


Posted by shaolin_Z on Feb-12-2005 02:56:

Interesting stuff Trancer-X. I wonder how long its going to take for the public to know what really happened, if that's ever going to happen.


Posted by Q5echo on Feb-12-2005 06:15:

i'm still watching. mildly entertained.


Posted by wolverine16 on Feb-12-2005 07:43:

Well let's see, the right blames Clinton and makes Richard Clarke out to be a Democrat looking for a position in the Kerry cabinet and out to hype his book, meanwhile this 9/11 Commission FAA information and Clarke's memo to Condi Rice are classified for "security reasons" but are no longer dangerous information now that the election is over. Rice clearly lied several times on this issue, nevermind her comments about Iraq. Maybe there are constant warnings about Al Qaeda now as well and some turn out not to be credible, but there were clearly more warning signs that the government knew about before 9/11 than we were told.


Posted by Trancer-X on Feb-12-2005 07:56:

http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/p...ml?itemNo=77744

http://www.findarticles.com/p/artic..._28/ai_78763669


Posted by wolverine16 on Feb-12-2005 09:07:



DARN YOU BILL CLINTON! IT'S ALL YOUR FAULT


Posted by tiesto14 on Feb-14-2005 19:40:

quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
Interesting stuff Trancer-X. I wonder how long its going to take for the public to know what really happened, if that's ever going to happen.



Why don't you enlighten us with what REALLY happened. I mean if you REALLY know what happened maybe you should contact the proper authoroties or a lawyer. With the information you posses you surely should take action ASAP!


Posted by shaolin_Z on Feb-14-2005 23:18:

quote:
Originally posted by tiesto14
Why don't you enlighten us with what REALLY happened. I mean if you REALLY know what happened maybe you should contact the proper authoroties or a lawyer. With the information you posses you surely should take action ASAP!


Well, the media is usually full of shit (espcially mainstream america media) and so are politicians. And its pretty f*cking obvious they're lying to us and are suppressing the facts. So until they declasssify those damn files, our heavily indoctrinated public will refuse to even consider anything other than what the Gov/Media says. It hard to believe they didn't know about the attacks before hand with all the info that is out now and obviously didn't to much to prevent it. That much is clear. If there's anything shadier than that, I don't know.


Posted by shaolin_Z on Feb-15-2005 06:00:

quote:
Originally posted by wolverine16


DARN YOU BILL CLINTON! IT'S ALL YOUR FAULT


Intresting document. El Quaida's goals are also specifically stated there. "Oh no, they hate us and our freedom."


Posted by occrider on Feb-15-2005 07:46:

quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
Well, the media is usually full of shit (espcially mainstream america media) and so are politicians. And its pretty f*cking obvious they're lying to us and are suppressing the facts. So until they declasssify those damn files, our heavily indoctrinated public will refuse to even consider anything other than what the Gov/Media says. It hard to believe they didn't know about the attacks before hand with all the info that is out now and obviously didn't to much to prevent it. That much is clear. If there's anything shadier than that, I don't know.


Same bullshit used by the religous right to "prove" the existence of God or the neocon "proof" for wmd's due to the lack of proof that there aren't wmds. Arguing a negative doesn't prove a god damn thing. While we're on the topic of examining 9/11 conspiracy theories, popular mechanics actually took the time to scientifically research the arguments posed by a number of internet websites:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/sci...html?page=1&c=y

Big surprise that sites such as "whatreallyhappened" selectively suppressed data and the context within which the data was provided in order to promote their agenda.


Posted by shaolin_Z on Feb-15-2005 22:59:

quote:
Originally posted by occrider
Same bullshit used by the religous right to "prove" the existence of God or the neocon "proof" for wmd's due to the lack of proof that there aren't wmds. Arguing a negative doesn't prove a god damn thing. While we're on the topic of examining 9/11 conspiracy theories, popular mechanics actually took the time to scientifically research the arguments posed by a number of internet websites:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/sci...html?page=1&c=y

Big surprise that sites such as "whatreallyhappened" selectively suppressed data and the context within which the data was provided in order to promote their agenda.


I checked out that link. I didnt even remotely suggest anything like that. All I said was there's enough evidence that indicates they knew about the attacks well in advance and didn't really do much about it.


Posted by occrider on Feb-16-2005 06:26:

quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
I checked out that link. I didnt even remotely suggest anything like that. All I said was there's enough evidence that indicates they knew about the attacks well in advance and didn't really do much about it.


Oh, and what comprehensive evidence establishes for a fact, knowledge of and willing inaction as opposed to simple incompetance and derilection?


Posted by shaolin_Z on Feb-17-2005 07:43:

quote:
Originally posted by occrider
Oh, and what comprehensive evidence establishes for a fact, knowledge of and willing inaction as opposed to simple incompetance and derilection?

I can't be bothered to pull up and post tons of material. You probably have already seen atleast some of it and totally disregarded it.
"Close your eyes and go back to sleep America, your Goverment has figured out how it all happened. Go back to sleep America. You are free to do as we tell you. You are free to do as we tell you. You are free to do as we tell you." (or something like that) -Bill Hicks


Posted by occrider on Feb-17-2005 07:52:

"It is known that there are an infinite number of worlds, simply because there is an infinite amount of space for them. However, not every one of them is inhabited. Therefore, there must be a finite number of inhabited worlds. Any finite number divided by infinity is as near to nothing as makes no odds, so the average population of all the planets in the Universe can be said to be zero. From this it follows that the population of the whole Universe is also zero, and that any people you may meet from time to time are merely the products of a deranged imagination."

- Douglas Adams

See, I can argue with quotes too.


Posted by shaolin_Z on Feb-17-2005 08:49:

quote:
Originally posted by occrider
See, I can argue with quotes too.

the only problem is that your's doesn't apply in this case and is quite irrelevant


Posted by CyberneticAngel on Feb-17-2005 09:37:

quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
the only problem is that your's doesn't apply in this case and is quite irrelevant


Well someone didn't get it


Posted by djshan on Feb-19-2005 01:01:

news like this is a waste of time.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.