TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- 2008: Clinton vs Rice?


Posted by josh4 on Feb-19-2005 01:58:

2008: Clinton vs Rice?

quote:
Hillary Leads Condi in 2008 Match-Up

Condi Leads Kerry

Survey of 1,000 Adults

January 29-30, 2005

Election 2008
Hillary Clinton 47%
Condoleezza Rice 40%

RasmussenReports.com

Election 2008
John Kerry 43%
Condoleezza Rice 45%

RasmussenReports.com



February 12, 2005--In a very early look at the 2008 Presidential Election, Senator Hillary Clinton leads Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice 47% to 40%. At the same time, Secretary Rice leads Senator John Kerry 45% to 43%.

The survey was conducted January 29-30, before Dr. Rice's first international tour as Secretary of State. Since the survey was taken, Americans have grown more optimistic about the situation in Iraq.

Fifty-one percent (51%) of voters believe that Senator Clinton is politically liberal while 27% say she is a moderate. For Senator Kerry, 46% said liberal and 31% moderate.

Secretary of State Rice is viewed as conservative by 43% and moderate by 28%.

Among married Americans, Rice has a very slight lead over Clinton. However, the New York Senator leads 55% to 32% among those who are not married.

Rice leads among Investors, 50% to 40% while Clinton leads among non-Investors 53% to 30%.


So it would be either a woman who can't satisfy her husband or a woman whos never had a husband.


Posted by smokeape on Feb-19-2005 02:02:

Oh, please spare me. Condi vs Hilary? I'd like to see them in a mud wrestling contest buck ass naked. Would be a close call and we'd need some Vegas odds. But, for President? C'mon now...a pathetic long shot at best.


[[[smoke]]]


Posted by sensorium on Feb-19-2005 02:08:

Women are good for one and only one thing in office. Please see Monica.


Posted by St_Andrew on Feb-19-2005 02:23:

i would love to see a female american president, but none of them lol


Posted by smokeape on Feb-19-2005 04:35:

quote:
Originally posted by ierxium
Women are good for one and only one thing in office. Please see Monica.


Now there's a serious contest. Hilary vs Rice in a winner takes all c*cksucking contest!

HAHHAHAHAAAA!!!


[[[smoke]]]


Posted by Yoepus on Feb-19-2005 04:39:

quote:
Originally posted by smokeape
Now there's a serious contest. Hilary vs Rice in a winner takes all c*cksucking contest!

HAHHAHAHAAAA!!!


[[[smoke]]]


I don't know about you guys - but I prefer my women; HOT!


Posted by ResonantDrag on Feb-19-2005 08:21:

if condi's president, will she cease to be a yes-ma'am?

contemplate that and your navel


Posted by ricky on Feb-19-2005 08:37:

clinton/obama 2008.


Posted by trancaholic on Feb-24-2005 15:48:

Well, Clinton is probably the best shot that the Democrats have right now. She's popular and well-known, whereas a contender such as John Kerry had to suffer the "who's John Kerry"-phase when he was running.


Posted by Zild on Feb-24-2005 16:02:

Fucking two faced one party system.


Posted by colonelcrisp on Feb-24-2005 19:59:

ya but if hillary got into the oval office and pulled the same stunt her x husband pulled.... that would make for and interesting video to leak to the internet....


Posted by Lira on Feb-25-2005 20:14:

Re: 2008: Clinton vs Rice?

Let's see. First there was Bush, and then Clinton twice. So there was Bush's son two times as well and finally another Clinton might be president.

There's a subtle lolness behind it
quote:
Originally posted by josh4
So it would be either a woman who can't satisfy her husband or a woman whos never had a husband.

Harsh but funny.


Posted by josh4 on Feb-25-2005 20:46:

^ Hey if either of them run thats going to be a really big issue. IMO that would be the kicker for Rice. The country is not going to elect a woman who has never been married, especially at her age. Clinton will have the same problems, there are going to be people who say if she can't satisfy the needs of her husband how can she satisfy the needs of a country?

Sad but true that it is not the same way for a man. Plus Clinton > Rice in terms of looks.


Posted by MisterOpus1 on Feb-25-2005 21:13:

I'm sorry, but people are smokin' rat turds if they think the Republicans are going to have an unmarried African American woman as a primary choice for a presidential candidate. I'm sure you all know that I'm neither a racist nor am I prejudice, but that's being completely realistic. To be honest, I'm a bit skeptical that the Dems. could pull off a woman candidate right now as well, despite Hillary's present popularity. I guess time will tell, but I see someone like Ashcroft, Rove, maybe even Frist as the Republican candidate a helluva lot more than an unmarried minority.


Posted by imokruok on Feb-26-2005 16:34:

Mmmm...nicer than Hillary.


Posted by Lira on Feb-26-2005 18:54:

quote:
Originally posted by josh4
there are going to be people who say if she can't satisfy the needs of her husband how can she satisfy the needs of a country?

That's the saddest way a person can view adultery



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.