TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Producers: A Call to Arms
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by RIPassion on Feb-19-2005 17:55:

Producers: A Call to Arms

I very strongly believe too many beginning producers start out with the aim of making a massive, big room trance track with a catchy, emotional, uplifting lead, and some compressed, thumping bass and drums. It's just THE only aim. It's not even said what the real aim of being a trance producer is anymore. For 80% of people (and rising), that's the unspoken, universal aim.

Please stop. Please force yourself to make at least one minimalistic track. Learn how to create euphoria and goosebumps with your music first, and then you can learn how to make people dance to that music. When you try to do it all at once from the very start, you will forget some small detail along the way, which will in turn make your music impersonal, unoriginal, and lacking some unknown thing.

If you feel like I'm accusing you, then I am, because you just realized that what I've said really is your aim (so I win ). If you don't think I'm accusing you, then I'm not. That simple. I hear all the time, (or read), "Don't produce for the money or fame, produce for the love of it." Great, now heed your own advice. What do you truly love about music?

This doesn't mean I'm asking for an ambient revolution or anything, I just would like to see everyone try to produce at least one different and minimalist style of trance rather than one style.

Don't hate me; I just want people to stop copying each other. I feel like I'm one of few who realizes that the definition of copying in a dance track has changed drastically over the past few years. It used to be obvious when a producer had a cool idea and tweaked his bass that certain way. Gouryella was the first to really effectively use that bass pattern. Anyone who wants rolling bass these days just slaps that down as an option because it sounded good. People make certain assumptions about what sounds good and what sounds good in their specific tracks, and fail to see the connection between.

I urge you, take some classic track, and go do a remix of it that's at least 30 bpm off.. I really think some people will be surprised at what happens. You'll find out you really can produce something meaningful, and it'll be simple. You'd be a hypocrite if you loved tracks like Morgan King - I'm Free, and then thought producing that kind of music wasn't important. Just go with your instinct.

A help for understanding what creativity and quality really is would be to read Pirsig's Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. There's so much good stuff in there, you should read it anyway. It takes things we do everyday to a most basic level and shows how complicated those bases really are, something I think is slipping away from trance. Please, I'm asking nicely For trance. For music.


Posted by chillsonic on Feb-19-2005 19:02:

+1

i started out producing crap-quality material. i know this. now, i'm working at a level which i am happy with. i wish i could produce great hard-hitting driving tracks, but i'm just not there yet (and am in no rush to get there too soon).


Posted by Project 7 on Feb-19-2005 19:05:

Yer i agree i havnt been "producing that long" and i was trying to come up with awesome melodys and stuff but just couldnt get em right and got lost with to many ideas

Anyway know im taking a slower approach and will gave a look into what you said


Posted by mef on Feb-19-2005 19:19:

Yeah that sounds about right


Posted by MadThijs on Feb-19-2005 19:53:

You can't judge people whom don't know.
You can judge people who don't care/want to learn, and think they know it all.


Posted by RIPassion on Feb-19-2005 20:08:

quote:
Originally posted by MadThijs
You can't judge people whom don't know.
You can judge people who don't care/want to learn, and think they know it all.


I can't tell what you're trying to say... "You can't judge people whom don't know." Do you mean "You can't judge people whom YOU don't know."? or "You can't judge people WHO don't know."? ...people who don't know what?

"You can judge people who don't care/want to learn, and they know it all." <--huh?

It's not about judging people, it's about juding the music, anyway. Not sure where you were going with that...


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Feb-20-2005 00:22:

I believe that you're not really an artist unless you are able to produce more than 1 style of music. Let's face it - just about anyone with FL/Reason/Cubase/[your program here] can produce a generic uplifting trance (or any other genre you happen to be a fan of) track, but it takes a true artist to stretch the boundaries.

Think outside the box. Genre restrictions only exist in your head.


Posted by The Drow on Feb-20-2005 13:29:

dmm that was deep...
but so true.


Posted by MadThijs on Feb-20-2005 14:09:

quote:
Originally posted by RIPassion
It's not about judging people, it's about juding the music, anyway. Not sure where you were going with that...

And who makes the music we judge?
You're right my sentences are strange and it should be who instead of whom.

"You can't judge people who don't know."
Producers make a track and it kind of sounds like something else. "Presets only""Using somethng that's done before(gouryella bassline/out of the blue leadsynth)"
These people won't get far, sometimes they do but then it's not because their music/production is good.

"You can judge people who don't care/want to learn, and think they know it all."
Copying Tiesto/Armin/FerryCorsten/Oakenfold or whatever producers they listen to. Sometimes Intentionally but most of the times because they listen to a particular sound and that's what their track happens to sound like.

`don�t care/want to learn" "I made the track""There's not better style then this/or that style"

You can learn a lot by finding out what you like in tracks in different styles, from classical to electronic.

And learn why you like it.

There are to much producers who make "computertrance" this is a term Ferry Corsten used for all the tracks who use the jp8000 sound of out of the blue, after it was released and apeared to be massive, and more presets.
And with that computer it's easier for the less talented producers to make a decent track.


Posted by JohnPaullino on Feb-20-2005 14:38:

I think rips inspiring a call to arms message is touching . Anyone can judge anything, fact is who gives a godamn. Wut the hell is computer trance, screw wut corsten sed , im gettin my jp tommorow, and I'll show him!


Posted by UphoricNitemare on Feb-20-2005 14:46:

I don't know what your trying to say, but I think that when anyone starts writing music, its only natural to try to replicate what you like. I think this is good for beginners, its only part of the learning curve. When i first started i had no intention of making it big.


Posted by DJMaytag on Feb-22-2005 03:43:

I'm down. It seems like EVERY track is about the hands in the air moment and has completely forgotten about the fact that this is DANCE music!

It annoys me to no end to be able to just LOOK at a record and know it's crap, where the grooves show 75% of the record is a huge breakdown. I don't get the point of having 1 minute of mix in time, 3 minutes of breakdown, then 1 minute of mix out time... never mind the fact that alot of the small time DJ's that want to spin that kind of music look out and see floors that seem lost for 3 minutes cuz there's nothing to dance to...


Posted by UphoricNitemare on Feb-22-2005 13:37:

I completely agree. I hate that the standard for trance is a huge breakdown. I mean, it has its place, but it should be more constant i think.


Posted by Sean Walsh on Feb-22-2005 14:54:

Excellent post.

Seriously, "less is more". The answer to making your shit sound pro isn't to layer 4 billion things together. Start with a simple idea, build the groove around that. Remember, this music is for a dancefloor, and if you forget that part then I will personally never be a fan =P


Posted by DJMaytag on Feb-22-2005 20:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Sean Walsh
Excellent post.

Seriously, "less is more". The answer to making your shit sound pro isn't to layer 4 billion things together. Start with a simple idea, build the groove around that. Remember, this music is for a dancefloor, and if you forget that part then I will personally never be a fan =P


"Less is more" was exactly the point of what the original trance pioneers were trying to achieve in the early 90's. It was sort of a knee jerk reaction to what was extremely popular (namely UK hardcore - the genre that spawned both jungle and happy hardcore - but to an extent the techno of the time as well).

Timbral modulation to create feelings and soundscapes was the order of the day in 1992, NOT powerful melodies and harmonies that came towards the end of the 90's. The TB-303 was an integral part of the trance movement, as the buildup from tweaking it could produce "a nervous breakdown on the dancefloor" as noted by Ramon Zenker, one half of trance pioneering duo Hardfloor (the ultimate trance classic of the early 90's is exemplified by their biggest hit, "Acperience 1", which devastated dancefloors worldwide - yes even here in the States in the early 90's).

Stripping things down to a simple beat for the foundation was a pretty integral part of the early movement as well. Many tracks were based on a simple bass drum, snare, hi-hats, and cymbals drum set.


Posted by pho mo on Feb-23-2005 01:31:

Why blame producers for making music with 3 minute breakdowns? Blame the DJ for playing crap like that to a crowd.

I mean, you can produce what the hell you want. Doesn't mean it's good for a dance floor, and DJs should realise this.


Posted by DJMaytag on Feb-23-2005 07:06:

quote:
Originally posted by pho mo
Why blame producers for making music with 3 minute breakdowns? Blame the DJ for playing crap like that to a crowd.


You realize how many records are like this? Damn near every L-Vee production has at least a 64 bar breakdown, if not longer (don't get me wrong, the rest of the song is AWESOME for many of his tracks, notably Planisphere - Totem). I think there have been a couple Katana productions/remixes with ultra long breakdowns. I wanna say some G&D tunes are like this too.

If you're a DJ Mag top-50 DJ that draws a huge crowd, you can get away with it, but if you're a small timer, what records do you have to choose from if they're all like the ones I mentioned? Do ya switch to techno?


Posted by Sean Walsh on Feb-23-2005 14:40:

The problem isn't with breakdowns IMO, the problem is with throwing a breakdown in there for the sake of having one. Listening to a lot of tunes, you can see that this is more or less what they did, like, "Okay I have a decent melody and some beats, now all I need to do is have a breakdown and I have a full track!". This is something I personally struggle with quite a bit myself, and would like to take more examples from techno in how they drop the beats out but keep the energy up.


Posted by UphoricNitemare on Feb-23-2005 16:05:

quote:
Originally posted by pho mo
Why blame producers for making music with 3 minute breakdowns? Blame the DJ for playing crap like that to a crowd.

I mean, you can produce what the hell you want. Doesn't mean it's good for a dance floor, and DJs should realise this.


Ditto


Posted by DJMaytag on Feb-26-2005 17:16:

how's this?

this thread got me motivated to do something a bit oldschool oriented, eschewing both the breakdowns and melody/harmony almost completely. I whipped up a little something in Reason and Rebirth over the course of the past few days, Rewired it up to Cubase for the final mixdown/mastering annd came up with this:


DJMaytag - QuaGmire.mp3

It's almost entirely based on tweaking of various paramaters to get some different and interesting timbres. The name also implies that it was, until the very last stages, based entirely upon the note of G. Not the key of G, the note of G. It was pretty damn good for just 4 synths (303 x2, Subtractor, Malstrom) all playing the same note, with lots of evolving textures keeping it interesting (yes, the final output was more than just a few synths playing one note).

Would this be something you're talking about, something different than the same old "computer trance" or "supersaw lead trance"?

Enjoy


Posted by RIPassion on Feb-26-2005 18:40:

cool

One big point that I was trying to make was show how the standard judgement of what copying a dance track is has changed a lot. I used the gouryella example off the top of my head because I was listening to gouryella at the time I was posting it, but I'm sure I could find something about every track of the last few years that traces back to some great idea an artist had 5 years ago that people have based their shit upon now. I think the thought process of some producers needs changing. Most of these bedroom producers just want to be able to produce what the "big guys" can produce, and they sit there with little vsts, so happy when they achieve something similar to the big guys, and it leaves every single track completely devoid of emotion, memory, and everything else. It's just quantity. Sometimes one track will get signed, at which point all the other bedroom producers will go, "yay, it got signed! It can be done! I'll do it one day, too!" And it's a retarded cycle. Seriously. These people forget that dance music/any electronic music is still music. There are a few rules you cannot break when you're creating any kind of music: rules like emotion, remembrance, and passion. Those three major things dissapear into the past when you get these little producers who just can't wait to create that cool lead he heard in xxxx track. He may even come up with a semi-decent melody, but I can always spot if the melody is a phony. It's so obvious. Then that person may ask, "There's just one thing missing from my track... I can't figure out what it is!" So he asks fellow producers for help, and they all point out things that could be improved, and he fixes them and is satisfied he may have fixed the problem. No. The problem is, you're track just that, a track. Classically thinking, it's a bunch of soundwaves melded together. You have to find the balance between scientific skill as a producer and emotional skill. If you don't, you're producing soundwaves in mass quantity - good job, ass.


Posted by MessiahProject on Feb-28-2005 10:35:

Maytag, Im impressed!! Just listened to Quagmire, and if that only took you a weekend then you are my god,my role model, my aim!! It sounds so professional. I too fall into the catagory this thread was set up to shame,I am using Cubase SX which i am trying to teach myself to use, but every track I try to right I think needs to be a MASSIVE tune that will get snapped up instantly - but they all sound so basic, and well - shit compared to Quagmire!! Think its time I started taking baby steps and reading more of this forum, and listening to the expert advise you guys give. The next track I start doing will be just for ME to listen to and enjoy - not for the dancefloor I think it could fill. Thanks guys - ive been Excorcised!!
MP


Posted by djdustx on Feb-28-2005 15:16:

quote:
Originally posted by RIPassion
It's so obvious. Then that person may ask, "There's just one thing missing from my track... I can't figure out what it is!" So he asks fellow producers for help, and they all point out things that could be improved, and he fixes them and is satisfied he may have fixed the problem. No. The problem is, you're track just that, a track. Classically thinking, it's a bunch of soundwaves melded together. You have to find the balance between scientific skill as a producer and emotional skill. If you don't, you're producing soundwaves in mass quantity - good job, ass.


Ok some of the points above do reflect on me...mainly the part were i asked fellow producers for help...but thats in the field of mastering and eq'ing which i have yet to master...and to see if they feel the expression and emotion in the track that i felt during its production.

I dunno why anyone would create a whole thread just to bash a certain category of people...but to answer a few statements in my opinion would maybe resolve some issues...as well as some narrow minded statements.

Me being a producer...well for me its been away of escaping this shit reality...the feeling from coming home after meeting people i pretend to like...socializing with people i hate just to get further in life...makes me feel better...along with giving me back the reason why i continue to live on this shit reality. This is what started me in producing...as i developed...so has my ambition to express my ideas and emotions in music.

I try my best to understand how to create trance music along with understanding its elements and structure. In order to master a skill u must know its basics and hows its evolved to the present state imo.
Therefore creating those cheesy breakdowns and fromage leads is imo a stepping stone to discovering this genre...and to discover how u can implement ur own ideas and styles which would lead to the pioneering lvl and taking music to the next step.

Music evolves...and so does its creators...

and for the ones still draggin on the cheesy method...there jus keepin that scene alive...no harm done...if u cant stand it...why listen to it?

Seb.

P.S. awesome track Maytag


Posted by DJMaytag on Feb-28-2005 18:07:

quote:
Originally posted by MessiahProject
Maytag, Im impressed!! Just listened to Quagmire, and if that only took you a weekend then you are my god,my role model, my aim!! It sounds so professional. I too fall into the catagory this thread was set up to shame,I am using Cubase SX which i am trying to teach myself to use, but every track I try to right I think needs to be a MASSIVE tune that will get snapped up instantly - but they all sound so basic, and well - shit compared to Quagmire!! Think its time I started taking baby steps and reading more of this forum, and listening to the expert advise you guys give. The next track I start doing will be just for ME to listen to and enjoy - not for the dancefloor I think it could fill. Thanks guys - ive been Excorcised!!
MP


Thanx MP, I'm glad you're diggin it.

While it did just take a few days (more like a full week), it took me over 10 years of noodling around to get to the point where I could do this so quickly. I took TONS of baby steps over the years, learning on hardware (mixers, synths, FX) and getting various bits of info wherever I could. I wish that forums like this existed in 1994 when I started, then maybe I might have been making tunes like Quagmire sooner?

I'd agree with doing things that YOU like first, rather than for a target audience. If you try to impress someone else, you might not impress yourself.


Posted by RIPassion on Mar-01-2005 03:47:

quote:
Originally posted by djdustx
I dunno why anyone would create a whole thread just to bash a certain category of people...


I didn't start the thread for that reason, hence the title "a call to arms," and not, "You shitheads, stop copying tracks." But, for a moment, let's assume I did make this thread to bash people. You're argument still doesn't make any sense:

quote:
Originally posted by djdustx
Me being a producer...well for me its been away of escaping this shit reality...the feeling from coming home after meeting people i pretend to like...socializing with people i hate just to get further in life...makes me feel better...along with giving me back the reason why i continue to live on this shit reality. This is what started me in producing...as i developed...so has my ambition to express my ideas and emotions in music.


"Reality" as you know it is everyone in the world. They create it, and you live in it. By calling it a shit reality, you're bashing about everyone else in the world, but people aren't allowed to bash you? I know this is pushing it, but pushing it seems to be up your alley

quote:
Originally posted by djdustx

and for the ones still draggin on the cheesy method...there jus keepin that scene alive...no harm done...if u cant stand it...why listen to it?


Why listen to it? lol. It's not like it's directly up to each person at Gatecrasher, for example, what tracks are played. You go to hear good tracks, and you don't buy your ticket thinking, "Well, if it's cheesy, I just won't listen... I'll leave or something."

Where were you going with that one?


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.