TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Album Reviews / New Releases Discussion
-- Chab - Dubs, Edits & Whisky-Coke
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by tjpatel on Feb-22-2005 04:51:

Chab - Dubs, Edits & Whisky-Coke

Chab - Dubs, Edits & Whisky-Coke
Release Date: Monday, March 07, 2005



Tracklist:

1. You And Me
2. Closer To Me (Feat. JD Davis)
3. Sunrise
4. Monster (Feat. JD Davis)
5. Lover
6. Five
7. My Memory
8. My Memory (Part 2)
9. Us And Them
10. 1987


Posted by Jasperovitsj on Feb-22-2005 10:31:

I've heard it, and it sounds magnificent!
For me it already beats Porter's Homegrown!

samples on www.astralmusic.nl


Posted by ChooChoo on Feb-23-2005 23:00:

great! This looks interesting I will definately check this out!


Posted by nettwerk on Feb-24-2005 00:52:

Me too. I'am already hooked up with his Moogwai album...


Posted by AlphaStarred on Feb-24-2005 03:43:

have always been an avid aficionado of Chab's, and was anticipating a new album...w00t!

can't wait to hear it...


Posted by DreamTitan on Feb-24-2005 03:55:

I'd like to get my hands on a copy of this and get it reviewed by one of my writers.


Posted by noikeee on Feb-24-2005 13:46:

looking forward to it with some mixed feelings.. i didn't like "closer to me" at all but "my memory (romania edit)" is absolutely brilliant


Posted by Phortastic on Mar-23-2005 19:19:

2 words: AMAZING album!!!

Besides "monster" and "Us & Them", which are decent but not all that great imo, this album is outstanding. Very driving and solid tracks. Great basslines, great melodies, great buildups, great breaks. Really takes you on a journey!


Posted by Bernd_Gradish on Mar-23-2005 22:02:

Already ordered Good CD!


Posted by sandstorm03 on Mar-23-2005 23:44:

i did not like the 3x12 , either monster or sunrise was my fav, i dont remember.

I was kind of dissapointed


Posted by Elior on Mar-25-2005 14:44:

quote:
Originally posted by Phortastic
2 words: AMAZING album!!!

Besides "monster" and "Us & Them", which are decent but not all that great imo, this album is outstanding. Very driving and solid tracks. Great basslines, great melodies, great buildups, great breaks. Really takes you on a journey!


+1.
A really well structured cd, great mixing and some stunning tracks
Chab rules


Posted by skip on Apr-04-2005 14:21:

i'm listening to this album now and all i gotta say is wow!!


this album is really good! for some reason i didn't expect much of this, but there's some great tunes here! too bad it's mixed though, so i won't be buying it as i have no use for it as i can't really use mixed tracks in my sets! too bad really.


Posted by Phortastic on Apr-06-2005 12:29:

quote:
Originally posted by skip
i'm listening to this album now and all i gotta say is wow!!


this album is really good! for some reason i didn't expect much of this, but there's some great tunes here! too bad it's mixed though, so i won't be buying it as i have no use for it as i can't really use mixed tracks in my sets! too bad really.



u can also LISTEN to cds u know.... in your car, at home, whatever. I always see you complaining that cds are mixed, sequenced whatever and that u cant mix with it. Dont you just buy cds to just listen to yourself? Just a question...

On an other note: if this CD would be NOT mixed it wouldnt be nearly as good as it is now. Its the flow and the journey the cd takes you on thats so good about it. You can only do that if its mixed imo.


Posted by skip on Apr-06-2005 12:51:

quote:
Originally posted by Phortastic
u can also LISTEN to cds u know.... in your car, at home, whatever. I always see you complaining that cds are mixed, sequenced whatever and that u cant mix with it. Dont you just buy cds to just listen to yourself? Just a question...

On an other note: if this CD would be NOT mixed it wouldnt be nearly as good as it is now. Its the flow and the journey the cd takes you on thats so good about it. You can only do that if its mixed imo.



no i don't listen to artist albums. i don't want to listen to the same artist for over an hour. if i want a mixed album i'll go buy a mixed dj set which has a lot more variation than a mixed artist album does! i listened to the unmixed vinyl version of this album too and i would have much rather taken that on cd than the mixed version. IMO it would be nice if they released the unmixed versions on cd too, but i guess that will never happen. IMO it's one of the best cds i've heard in a long while, it's just too bad for me that it has been mixed.


Posted by Phortastic on Apr-06-2005 12:52:

quote:
Originally posted by skip
if i want a mixed album i'll go buy a mixed dj set which has a lot more variation than a mixed artist album does!


is that so?
i guess you have been listening to the wrong artist albums.


Posted by skip on Apr-06-2005 12:58:

quote:
Originally posted by Phortastic
is that so?
i guess you have been listening to the wrong artist albums.



you really think a mixed artist album has more variation than a mixed dj set does?! and don't compare let's say a bt album to some gay epic trance mix cd where all the tunes sound the same, because that is not a fair comparison in any way and not at all what i meant!


Posted by Phortastic on Apr-06-2005 13:02:

quote:
Originally posted by skip
you really think a mixed artist album has more variation than a mixed dj set does?! and don't compare let's say a bt album to some gay epic trance mix cd where all the tunes sound the same, because that is not a fair comparison in any way and not at all what i meant!




why would a mixed compilation like GU 27 or therapy sessions 2 have more variation than this artist album or steve porter's recent artist album? A good mixed cd and a good artist album both have alot of variation. Otherwise it wouldnt be "good" in my book.


Posted by skip on Apr-06-2005 13:09:

quote:
Originally posted by Phortastic
why would a mixed compilation like GU 27 or therapy sessions 2 have more variation than this artist album or steve porter's recent artist album? A good mixed cd and a good artist album both have alot of variation. Otherwise it wouldnt be "good" in my book.




sure thing. variation is good. i'm not saying that this album for exmple doesn't have variation, which it does, BUT not as much if it would be 10 different tracks by 10 different producers. these are all done by the same guy and thus most likely have less variation in them than 10 tracks done by 10 different producers. IMO this is really very simple and i can't see how this has as much variation than let's say gu27, which i haven't heard though.


Posted by Phortastic on Apr-06-2005 13:19:

quote:
Originally posted by skip
sure thing. variation is good. i'm not saying that this album for exmple doesn't have variation, which it does, BUT not as much if it would be 10 different tracks by 10 different producers. these are all done by the same guy and thus most likely have less variation in them than 10 tracks done by 10 different producers. IMO this is really very simple and i can't see how this has as much variation than let's say gu27, which i haven't heard though.


yes GU 27 has all tracks from different producers. Does that mean it has more variation? I dont see the logic in that man. A mixed compilation, like GU 27 for example, is mixed by 1 man and its all kinda in the same genre as well. U cant put all kind of genres and styles on a cd. Not on an artist album but not on a mixed comp either.


Posted by sandstorm03 on Apr-06-2005 13:23:

quote:
Originally posted by skip
sure thing. variation is good. i'm not saying that this album for exmple doesn't have variation, which it does, BUT not as much if it would be 10 different tracks by 10 different producers. these are all done by the same guy and thus most likely have less variation in them than 10 tracks done by 10 different producers. IMO this is really very simple and i can't see how this has as much variation than let's say gu27, which i haven't heard though.


I don't know where I stand on this issue. Its quite interesting. I think that there are very few mix cds, that actually have more variation then a lot of artist albums. I havn't bought a mix cd since Involver, and then before that I don't even know what the last one was. I think it was Stark Raving Mad. And last artis album Nu NRG's free fall.

Anyway I listned to the vinyl release and was really disappointed. I like a lot of Chabs stuff, so I thought that this would be absolutely amazing, but there were only 2 tracks on this that I enjoyed (monster & my memory). He also just came out with his Mooguai cd aswell, which did not look impressive.


Posted by sandstorm03 on Apr-06-2005 13:25:

quote:
Originally posted by Phortastic
yes GU 27 has all tracks from different producers. Does that mean it has more variation? I dont see the logic in that man. A mixed compilation, like GU 27 for example, is mixed by 1 man and its all kinda in the same genre as well. U cant put all kind of genres and styles on a cd. Not on an artist album but not on a mixed comp either.



can you name 5 "trance" artist albums since 2000 with variation?



NE 1 for example had soo many styles of house & trance its rediculas...


Posted by Phortastic on Apr-06-2005 13:28:

quote:
Originally posted by sandstorm03
can you name 5 "trance" artist albums since 2000 with variation?



NE 1 for example had soo many styles of house & trance its rediculas...



who said i was talking about trance?
since when is GU 27, this album or steve porter's album trance?
naming 5 "trance" artist albums with alot of variation is indeed difficult. Would have to look into that


Posted by sandstorm03 on Apr-06-2005 13:32:

quote:
Originally posted by Phortastic
who said i was talking about trance?
since when is GU 27, this album or steve porter's album trance?
naming 5 "trance" artist albums with alot of variation is indeed difficult. Would have to look into that



well you could try house/prog cds as well... I dont remember seeing many artist albums though...


I havn't heard porters album yet. I dont know if it is bassy enough for my taste in prog...


Vodka Cranberries isnt the style I dig.


But I love his work with Debo on "2 Days On Landsdowne" & Definite Form (Jumpin Dub) isnt bad either.


Posted by skip on Apr-06-2005 13:44:

quote:
Originally posted by Phortastic
yes GU 27 has all tracks from different producers. Does that mean it has more variation? I dont see the logic in that man. A mixed compilation, like GU 27 for example, is mixed by 1 man and its all kinda in the same genre as well. U cant put all kind of genres and styles on a cd. Not on an artist album but not on a mixed comp either.



dj mix: mixed by one man, tracks by many artists
mixed artist album: mixed by one man, tracks by one man


different producers produce tracks in different ways. producers usually have a "sound" at least somewhat. there's a bigger chance of 2 tracks done by different producers to sound more different than 2 tracks done by one producer, even if they are in the same genre!!!

and of course you can't put all kind of genres and styles on a cd. why would you? i'm not talking about genres and styles here, i'm talking about the sound.


sorry but i don't see your logic in this at all.


Posted by Phortastic on Apr-06-2005 14:52:

you are not getting it man. But whatever. We disagree on this, fine by me. I did my best at explaining it.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.