TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Album Reviews / New Releases Discussion
-- Chab - Dubs, Edits & Whisky-Coke
Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Chab - Dubs, Edits & Whisky-Coke
Chab - Dubs, Edits & Whisky-Coke
Release Date: Monday, March 07, 2005

Tracklist:
1. You And Me
2. Closer To Me (Feat. JD Davis)
3. Sunrise
4. Monster (Feat. JD Davis)
5. Lover
6. Five
7. My Memory
8. My Memory (Part 2)
9. Us And Them
10. 1987
I've heard it, and it sounds magnificent!
For me it already beats Porter's Homegrown!
samples on www.astralmusic.nl
great! This looks interesting
I will definately check this out!
Me too. I'am already hooked up with his Moogwai album...
have always been an avid aficionado of Chab's, and was anticipating a new album...w00t!
can't wait to hear it...
I'd like to get my hands on a copy of this and get it reviewed by one of my writers.
looking forward to it with some mixed feelings.. i didn't like "closer to me" at all but "my memory (romania edit)" is absolutely brilliant
2 words: AMAZING album!!!
Besides "monster" and "Us & Them", which are decent but not all that great imo, this album is outstanding. Very driving and solid tracks. Great basslines, great melodies, great buildups, great breaks. Really takes you on a journey!
Already ordered
Good CD!
i did not like the 3x12
, either monster or sunrise was my fav, i dont remember.
I was kind of dissapointed
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Phortastic 2 words: AMAZING album!!! Besides "monster" and "Us & Them", which are decent but not all that great imo, this album is outstanding. Very driving and solid tracks. Great basslines, great melodies, great buildups, great breaks. Really takes you on a journey! |

i'm listening to this album now and all i gotta say is wow!!
this album is really good! for some reason i didn't expect much of this, but there's some great tunes here! too bad it's mixed though, so i won't be buying it as i have no use for it as i can't really use mixed tracks in my sets! too bad really.

| quote: |
| Originally posted by skip i'm listening to this album now and all i gotta say is wow!! this album is really good! for some reason i didn't expect much of this, but there's some great tunes here! too bad it's mixed though, so i won't be buying it as i have no use for it as i can't really use mixed tracks in my sets! too bad really. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Phortastic u can also LISTEN to cds u know.... in your car, at home, whatever. I always see you complaining that cds are mixed, sequenced whatever and that u cant mix with it. Dont you just buy cds to just listen to yourself? Just a question... On an other note: if this CD would be NOT mixed it wouldnt be nearly as good as it is now. Its the flow and the journey the cd takes you on thats so good about it. You can only do that if its mixed imo. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by skip if i want a mixed album i'll go buy a mixed dj set which has a lot more variation than a mixed artist album does! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Phortastic is that so? i guess you have been listening to the wrong artist albums. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by skip you really think a mixed artist album has more variation than a mixed dj set does?! and don't compare let's say a bt album to some gay epic trance mix cd where all the tunes sound the same, because that is not a fair comparison in any way and not at all what i meant! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Phortastic why would a mixed compilation like GU 27 or therapy sessions 2 have more variation than this artist album or steve porter's recent artist album? A good mixed cd and a good artist album both have alot of variation. Otherwise it wouldnt be "good" in my book. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by skip sure thing. variation is good. i'm not saying that this album for exmple doesn't have variation, which it does, BUT not as much if it would be 10 different tracks by 10 different producers. these are all done by the same guy and thus most likely have less variation in them than 10 tracks done by 10 different producers. IMO this is really very simple and i can't see how this has as much variation than let's say gu27, which i haven't heard though. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by skip sure thing. variation is good. i'm not saying that this album for exmple doesn't have variation, which it does, BUT not as much if it would be 10 different tracks by 10 different producers. these are all done by the same guy and thus most likely have less variation in them than 10 tracks done by 10 different producers. IMO this is really very simple and i can't see how this has as much variation than let's say gu27, which i haven't heard though. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Phortastic yes GU 27 has all tracks from different producers. Does that mean it has more variation? I dont see the logic in that man. A mixed compilation, like GU 27 for example, is mixed by 1 man and its all kinda in the same genre as well. U cant put all kind of genres and styles on a cd. Not on an artist album but not on a mixed comp either. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by sandstorm03 can you name 5 "trance" artist albums since 2000 with variation? NE 1 for example had soo many styles of house & trance its rediculas... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Phortastic who said i was talking about trance? since when is GU 27, this album or steve porter's album trance? naming 5 "trance" artist albums with alot of variation is indeed difficult. Would have to look into that |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Phortastic yes GU 27 has all tracks from different producers. Does that mean it has more variation? I dont see the logic in that man. A mixed compilation, like GU 27 for example, is mixed by 1 man and its all kinda in the same genre as well. U cant put all kind of genres and styles on a cd. Not on an artist album but not on a mixed comp either. |

you are not getting it man. But whatever. We disagree on this, fine by me. I did my best at explaining it.
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.