syria to redeploy lebanon troops - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- syria to redeploy lebanon troops

Posted by B018 on Mar-05-2005 19:40:

syria to redeploy lebanon troops

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4322089.stm

Posted by Jackson on Mar-05-2005 19:44:

Dont you mean "Syria to redeploy Lebanon troops"?

Posted by Yoepus on Mar-05-2005 19:50:

Re: syria to redeploy syrian troops

quote:
Originally posted by B018
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4322089.stm

It is promosing. But the Syrians will do as little as they have too.
I hope the Lebanese will keep the pressure and spotlight on the Syrians, I believe if it is intense enough the Syrians will come to an almost complete withdraw of not only the military forces, but also the Syrian political forces in Lebanon.

I was very excited about htis statement:

quote:
Israeli Vice-Prime Minister Shimon Peres said Israel could open peace talks with Lebanon if Syria withdrew.

"Why can't we all just get along?" Might finally come true!

Posted by George Smiley on Mar-05-2005 23:43:

Now all we need to complete the picture is for Israel to withdraw from Syria like UN Resolutions say!

Posted by Yoepus on Mar-06-2005 07:29:

quote:
Originally posted by George Smiley
Now all we need to complete the picture is for Israel to withdraw from Syria like UN Resolutions say!

Posted by George Smiley on Mar-06-2005 13:27:

quote:
Originally posted by Yoepus

Ha...ha...

The Golan Heights are Syrian

Posted by Yoepus on Mar-06-2005 22:10:

quote:
Originally posted by George Smiley
Ha...ha...

The Golan Heights are Syrian

Says who? You Brits who made the artificial colonial borders?

quaint.

Posted by George Smiley on Mar-07-2005 00:55:

quote:
Originally posted by Yoepus
Says who? You Brits who made the artificial colonial borders?

quaint.

Hey that was France! Anyway, its not like the British made a mess of anything in the M/E did we?!

Posted by smokeape on Mar-08-2005 01:40:

Syrians have no definite timetable to withdraw troops entirely from Lebanon...just back them up to the border. So GW and clan continue to pressure them.

[[[smoke]]]

Posted by George Smiley on Mar-08-2005 02:32:

I just dont understand it, people on the right get all mad that Syria is occupying Lebanon, but have no problems with Iraqi and Palestinian occupation, then people on the left get all mad about Iraq and Palestine, yet make excuses for Syrian occupation just cos America doesn't want it!

Posted by hardcore trancer on Mar-08-2005 03:11:

Posted by Q5echo on Mar-08-2005 03:46:

quote:
Originally posted by George Smiley
I just dont understand it, people on the right get all mad that Syria is occupying Lebanon, but have no problems with Iraqi and Palestinian occupation, then people on the left get all mad about Iraq and Palestine, yet make excuses for Syrian occupation just cos America doesn't want it!

whoa dude. lets not forget the timetables we are dealing with here between Israeli, Syrian, and American occupation. i'm not naive enough to go as far as to say your comparing apples to oranges,
however, the means my president has used to affect these occupations is evident in their perspective ends.

A. they are all different with respect to duration compared to how long this administration has been in office.

B. in regards to the Iraqi occupation, Bush has given every opportunity to the existing government to ask us to leave. as far as you and i know the elected government does not wish this yet. everyone else is just a critic.

Posted by Q5echo on Mar-08-2005 03:46:

quote:
Originally posted by hardcore trancer
Fuckin werd man,It is soo fuckin pathatic.

for some reason the Fuckin American choose who is good or evil.

stfu

Posted by hardcore trancer on Mar-08-2005 05:40:

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
stfu

Never

Posted by shaolin_Z on Mar-08-2005 10:24:

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
B. in regards to the Iraqi occupation, Bush has given every opportunity to the existing government to ask us to leave. as far as you and i know the elected government does not wish this yet. everyone else is just a critic.

Posted by George Smiley on Mar-08-2005 14:33:

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
whoa dude. lets not forget the timetables we are dealing with here between Israeli, Syrian, and American occupation. i'm not naive enough to go as far as to say your comparing apples to oranges,
however, the means my president has used to affect these occupations is evident in their perspective ends.

A. they are all different with respect to duration compared to how long this administration has been in office.

B. in regards to the Iraqi occupation, Bush has given every opportunity to the existing government to ask us to leave. as far as you and i know the elected government does not wish this yet. everyone else is just a critic.

Ok I agree the Iraqi occupation is a bad comparison (and I dont actually think we should leave until the Iraqis have an effective security aparatus) but there is no difference between Israeli and Syrian occupation (except the Lebanese have far more rights than the Palestinians)

Posted by Yoepus on Mar-08-2005 14:40:

quote:
Originally posted by George Smiley
(except the Lebanese have far more rights than the Palestinians)

What about Palestinian-Lebanese? Or they don't count?