TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- USA - New York
-- The Da Vinci Code
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by sandstorm03 on Apr-08-2005 19:38:

Thumbs up The Da Vinci Code

Good book, i guess some movie with Tom Hanks is comming out as well...


You should read it if you havn't.


Posted by DJ STEEVROCK on Apr-08-2005 19:45:

The Da Vinci Code is Fucking DOPE!!!! Hopefully the movie can live up to it. It should blow the passion of the christ out of the fucking water easy. As far as religion and controversy goes. CANT WAIT!!! I heard Angels and Demons is a sick book too...Im gonna start that one this weekend.


Posted by sandstorm03 on Apr-08-2005 19:47:

whats that book?


ps - i hate tom hanks... should have gotten harrison ford or something...


Posted by DJ STEEVROCK on Apr-08-2005 19:54:

quote:
Originally posted by sandstorm03
whats that book?


ps - i hate tom hanks... should have gotten harrison ford or something...


Angels and Demon is by Dan Brown also.... it into more into the pope, tons more controsery regarding religion and a little more farfetched..from what I hear??

Da Vinci Code Movie

Tom Hanks is awesome and Ron howard is directing should be good!!!??


Posted by phuzzyfish12 on Apr-08-2005 19:59:

Both Awesome books....awesome!!! you'll fininsh them in like 2 seconds!!! I hope the movie lives up to the book!!!


A&D is the book that actually comes before the Da Vinci Code


Posted by trunks1022 on Apr-08-2005 22:11:

read both... read AD first, then da vinci.

please choose sophie marceau as the girl opposite tom hanks... and why tom hanks. BLEH


Posted by dj tek on Apr-08-2005 22:11:

quote:
Originally posted by trunks1022
read both... read AD first, then da vinci

tru...

A&D.


Posted by DarkFall01 on Apr-08-2005 23:40:

I�m reading it right now, it�s pretty good, it def got me hooked. I also read Angels & Demons, couldn�t lay the book down until I was done. One thing I don�t like about Dan Brown is that he makes alot of stuff up in both books as far as facts go. Still very entertaining

quote:
Originally posted by sandstorm03
i hate tom hanks... should have gotten harrison ford or something...


I like Tom Hanks, but don�t think he fits the character well, we�ll see, he�s a good actor, he can prob pull it off
Harrison Ford would�ve been better imo


Posted by sandstorm03 on Apr-09-2005 02:50:

quote:
Originally posted by DarkFall01
One thing I don�t like about Dan Brown is that he makes alot of stuff up in both books as far as facts go. Still very entertaining


I love that. Very creative...


Posted by sot on Apr-09-2005 04:34:

whats this book about..i dont read much but i saw it around my house lol it worth reading? i havent read a book since 10th grade lol


Posted by sandstorm03 on Apr-09-2005 05:55:

yea its good, its kinda like "national treasurs" with nicholas cage, but much better.


Dan brown makes a mystery out of davincis work. It is written extreamly well. I swear i saw the movie lol! i think i finished it in a few hours...


I also read M. Chriton(sp) "state of fear" that wasnt to bad either. I normally go threw periods that i love to read. really wierd.


Posted by trunks1022 on Apr-09-2005 06:37:

it's funny how many critics THINK that dan brown is giving christianity a bad name by implying all that stuff about jesus and the holy grail in the book (not going to give away any spoilers). but plain and simple on the first few pages, brown writes that only 2 or 3 facts are totally true. everything else is fiction.


Posted by sandstorm03 on Apr-09-2005 06:39:

lol yea...


Posted by DJ_Lord on Apr-09-2005 07:31:

quote:
Originally posted by sot
i havent read a book since 10th grade lol



no wonderrrr!!!


Posted by sot on Apr-09-2005 20:30:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ_Lord
no wonderrrr!!!



fuck off jon


Posted by blitzm on Apr-15-2005 02:34:

This is the next book I will read My current one is House of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski.


Posted by ProggieGuy on Apr-15-2005 16:34:

quote:
Originally posted by trunks1022
read both... read AD first, then da vinci.

please choose sophie marceau as the girl opposite tom hanks... and why tom hanks. BLEH


...agreed Tom Hanks is kind of weak, he's too....goofy.


Posted by DJ STEEVROCK on Apr-15-2005 17:30:

quote:
Originally posted by ProggieGuy
...agreed Tom Hanks is kind of weak, he's too....goofy.


The role Tom hanks will play is as a professor. I really dont think this part is geared towards vin deisel... Tom Hanks is probably one of the greatest actors of all time. Every movie hes been has been the shizzle and almost unforgettable. He rarely does or pick crappy roles or movies to appear in. So I dont think he will disappoint. Should be an awesome movie


Posted by Highmay on Apr-15-2005 17:53:

quote:
Originally posted by ProggieGuy
...agreed Tom Hanks is kind of weak, he's too....goofy.



goofy?? he was goofy in Philadelphia?? He was goofy in Castaway? He was goofy in Saving Private Ryan? He was goofy in Road to Perdition?? oh yeah, you know what youre talkin about...


Posted by Highmay on Apr-15-2005 17:57:

and mind you guys: Tom Hanks will be starring alongside Audrey Tatou, the same girl in Amelie, Dirty Pretty Things, and Very Long Engagment...


Posted by dj tek on Apr-15-2005 17:59:

quote:
Originally posted by Highmay
goofy?? he was goofy in Philadelphia?? He was goofy in Castaway? He was goofy in Saving Private Ryan? He was goofy Road to Perdition?? oh yeah, you know what youre talkin about...

he was goofy in Splash, he was goofy in Bachalor Party, he was goofy in Forest Gump and he was definitely goofy in Big. yeah, he knew what he was talking about...


Posted by Highmay on Apr-15-2005 18:02:

quote:
Originally posted by dj tek
he was goofy in Splash, he was goofy in Bachalor Party, he was goofy in Forest Gump and he was definitely goofy in Big. yeah, he knew what he was talking about...


wrong...he said he was too goofy, meaning that he's not able to play in a serious role...jim carrey and robin williams are the epitome of goofy, but they can also be serious when needed...same with tom hanks...hanks has fucking won oscars because of his serious roles...how the fuck does he possibly know what he's talking about...


Posted by dj tek on Apr-15-2005 18:05:

quote:
Originally posted by Highmay
wrong...he said he was too goofy, meaning that he's not able to play in a serious role...jim carrey and robin williams are the epitome of goofy, but they can also be serious when needed...same with tom hanks...hanks has fucking won oscars because of his serious roles...how the fuck does he possibly know what he's talking about...

good for you. and tom hanks loves your puerto rican ass too.


Posted by PVDenraptured on Apr-16-2005 03:17:

has everybody in the world but me read this?


Posted by DJ_Lord on Apr-16-2005 05:16:

quote:
Originally posted by PVDenraptured
has everybody in the world but me read this?


yea, u suck.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.