TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- OKC Remembered


Posted by ogvh5150 on Apr-20-2005 23:26:

OKC Remembered

Too busy finding about that German guy who made pope? Yes me too, they got me distracted.

The Oklahoma City Bombing
Were there additional explosive charges and additional bombers?


The Oklahoma City Bombing
PROOF there were additional explosive charges


The Oklahoma City Bombing
What was the Army doing with a Ryder Truck just before the Murrah blast?


Posted by Trancer-X on Apr-21-2005 06:19:

Re: OKC Remembered

quote:
Originally posted by ogvh5150
Too busy finding about that German guy who made pope? Yes me too, they got me distracted.



The Oklahoma City Bombing
PROOF there were additional explosive charges


If those papers are legit, then that's some crazy shit!


Posted by Jackson on Apr-21-2005 10:58:

Hmmm...im confused as i dont know much about the bombing.
2 more bombs were found....what does that mean? The guy who put a bomb there in the first place put two more there aswell? Or is it much more complex than that?


Posted by ogvh5150 on Apr-21-2005 11:14:

The simplicity is to manufacture a patsy. Label him some kind of patriot/gun nut/anti-government sociopath and then execute him.


Posted by Jackson on Apr-21-2005 12:12:

quote:
Originally posted by ogvh5150
The simplicity is to manufacture a patsy. Label him some kind of patriot/gun nut/anti-government sociopath and then execute him.


I'm confused...maybe i better do so reading on Wikipedia if i get time later.


Posted by el.maestro on Apr-21-2005 20:47:

It means, boys and girs, that this OP was done by a group and not an individual.


Posted by Q5echo on Apr-21-2005 20:58:

quote:
Originally posted by ogvh5150
The simplicity is to manufacture a patsy. Label him some kind of patriot/gun nut/anti-government sociopath and then execute him.

oh if it were only that simple though.

McVeigh never claimed to be a patsy.

in fact, their is ginourmous amounts of credible evidence pointing to a third and even multiple parties involved in the planning and execution of OKC including what you have posted here. a lot of it points to some sort of cover-up by the previous administration for what reasons i can only speculate.

don't forget about nichols either.

i curious, what is your point for these documents?


Posted by ogvh5150 on Apr-22-2005 02:13:

quote:
Originally posted by Jackson
I'm confused...maybe i better do so reading on Wikipedia if i get time later.


Wiki is good but remember the internet was actually a military project once.





I think i just scrambled your mind some more.


Well to make an omelet you have to break some eggs.

@Q5echo:

A few years (1991-1993) before OKC happened there was a book written by Martin Keating (wayback link) brother of then (1995) Governor Frank Keating. In this book there seems to be a character named Tom McVey who happens to get car stopped for a busted taillight just like Timothy McVeigh. I haven't read the book to confirm this but the original web site for the book has been 404 for some time.



The Oklahoma City Bombing
What was the Army doing with a Ryder Truck just before the Murrah blast?


Point is:

Some look at the swill and talk about it.
Some look at the swill and eat it.
Some look at the swill and refuse to eat.


I refuse to eat.

There are things here that go beyond whether McVeigh and Nicols acted alone. If these are their real names or not, no one is sure. That secret went to his grave with him.

Paperclip
Monarch
MK Ultra
Different channels same end result.


Posted by Q5echo on Apr-22-2005 07:58:

some look at swill and imagine it's a steak dinner because someone they never met before wispered in their myopic ear.
in other words, i think you are eating it. just not what you believe you're "not eating"
how's that for criptic?

it's amazing what people are willing to convince themselves of given such flimsy evidence despite three years of testimony by hundreds of witnesses and lawers from both sides of a trial that almost acquitted him.

why did he plead not guilty?

why did he refuse the plea bargain?

why was there a plea bargain?

you know he's still alive, right?

why have his relatives stuck by his side?

his wife was duped just so the Feds could take it to trial.

i'm not saying he's not guilty, or deserves to die or anything for that matter. i don't care. all i'm saying here is that i believe there is a cover up, however, you are barking up the wrong tree.


Posted by ogvh5150 on Apr-22-2005 11:05:

(Changed the text to one deceased regarding McVeigh)

The courtroom is another story that can be summed up in one word:

Drama.


Posted by Q5echo on Apr-22-2005 15:48:

grow up dude

you're smarter than this


Posted by shaolin_Z on Apr-22-2005 16:28:

no, he's smart enough to sense propoganda and cover-ups.


Posted by Q5echo on Apr-22-2005 17:44:

i'm almost positive their is a cover-up...just not what he's sucking up to.

that, and it's a very incoherent conspiracy theory (as with most conspiracy theories) he's buying. and you too?


Posted by ogvh5150 on Apr-23-2005 00:09:

Do you really think that the trial should mean much to me?

The trial was going to end in guilty, whether it lasted 10 months or 10 days or 10 minutes. That man never had a chance. If they could try Santa Claus for murder they would.

If one part of the OKC story is polluted with inconsistencies then maybe the whole after effects like the trial were too.

Imagine if Oswald survived Ruby. What would we have seen or heard?


Posted by Trancer-X on Apr-24-2005 20:55:

http://www.generalpartin.org/redflags.htm

http://www.thetribulation.com/partin.htm


Posted by Trancer-X on Apr-24-2005 23:52:

quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
no, he's smart enough to sense propoganda and cover-ups.


http://www.archive.org/movies/detai...heRoadtoTyranny

Download section on the left side.



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.