TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Iran Likely to Resume Nuclear Activities

Iran Likely to Resume Nuclear Activities

quote:

Iran Likely to Resume Nuclear Activities By ALI AKBAR DAREINI, Associated Press WriterSat Apr 30, 5:49 PM ET Iran said Saturday it is likely to resume uranium enrichment-related activities within a week, a process it halted last year to build confidence in talks with European countries and avoid referral to the U.N. Security Council for possible sanctions. Tehran's announcement came a day after talks in London with European negotiators yielded no results. France, Britain and Germany, acting on behalf of the 25-nation European Union, are seeking guarantees from Iran that it will not use its nuclear program to make weapons, as Washington suspects. Top Iranian nuclear negotiator Hasan Rowhani was quoted as saying Tehran expects to restart enrichment activities � injecting uranium gas into centrifuges � at its uranium conversion facility in Isfahan. "It's unlikely that uranium enrichment ... which takes place in Natanz, will be resumed, but it's likely that some activities at Isfahan Uranium Conversion Facility will restart next week," IRNA quoted Rowhani as saying Saturday. The central cities of Natanz and Isfahan house the heart of Iran's nuclear program. The Isfahan conversion facility reprocesses uranium ore concentrate into gas, which is then taken to Natanz and fed into the centrifuges for enrichment. In Vienna, Austria, a senior diplomat close to the International Atomic Energy Agency said the U.N. nuclear watchdog body had not been informed as of Saturday afternoon of Tehran's intention. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the issue's sensitivity. The Europeans want Iran to permanently abandon enrichment, a process that can produce nuclear reactor fuel and, when taken to a higher level, material for bombs. In return, it is offering Iran economic aid, technical support and backing for Tehran's efforts to join mainstream international organizations. Washington last month agreed to support the EU effort but signaled that Iran � which Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice last month labeled an "outpost of tyranny" � should quickly accept it or face harsh Security Council sanctions. Iran insists its nuclear program is entirely peaceful and for generating electricity. Iran says its November decision to suspend uranium enrichment-related activities was voluntary, temporary and not permanent, claiming it has a right to perform such activities under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. The Islamic republic also has warned that the talks with the Europeans would collapse if they do not yield results soon. Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi warned Thursday that "we will have no choice but to restart the uranium enrichment program." Rowhani called the London talks "perhaps the last opportunity" for an agreement and acknowledged Iran and the Europeans had failed to achieve a compromise. "The Europeans still insist on having more time to review the details of the plan (presented by Iran)," IRNA quoted him as saying. Rowhani said Iran also may reveal details of its plan that provides legal, political and technical guarantees that its nuclear fuel activities will remain peaceful. Restarting some nuclear activities does not mean Iran will end negotiations with the Europeans, he added. "Iran will continue talks and will keep its contacts with Europe," he said. U.S. efforts to refer Iran to the Security Council were "meaningless," he added without elaborating. Hossein Shariatmadari, a senior hard-liner and a close associate of Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, urged his government to immediately pull out of the talks and resume all nuclear activities. "From now on, giving an opportunity to the Europeans is waste of time and it will seriously damage the prestige of Islamic Iran," Shariatmadari said in an editorial in his hard-line newspaper Kayhan. "The prestige of our establishment requires ending the talks and resuming uranium enrichment." http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050430...HNlYwMlJVRPUCUl

I guess now it is a good time for the U.S to make up lies to attack Iran.

+1

or how about North Korea, the Americans are going to be very busy...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/as...fic/4503531.stm

quote:

Originally posted by zig or how about North Korea, the Americans are going to be very busy... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/as...fic/4503531.stm

Nah, Iran has more oil than NK.

quote:

Originally posted by Jackson Nah, Iran has more oil than NK.

It mightnt have oil, but it has nuclear weapons and a not very rational dictator in charge.

We always depend on the U.N. to get involved...

quote:

Originally posted by zig It mightnt have oil, but it has nuclear weapons and a not very rational dictator in charge.

quote:

Survival, Vol 45, No 3 "Seeing North Korea Clearly" ...most Korea specialists believe the North Korean regime is neither irrational or crazy...

quote:

Originally posted by Fir3start3r We always depend on the U.N. to get involved...

One, why have a pop at the UN by posting a picture of the EU up and two, what five countries are to blame when the UN takes no action? (such as in Rwanda which Americans ALWAYS use as the argument why the UN is crap, completely oblivious to EVERYTHING the UN does that does not include military action which, seeing as the UN has no standing army is gonna be a lot - rant over)

Woops...that was supposed to be E.U.

My bad...

Come to think of it...the U.N. wouldn't be much different really...

quote:

Originally posted by Fir3start3r Woops...that was supposed to be E.U. My bad... Come to think of it...the U.N. wouldn't be much different really...

And what is the EU doin wrong?

And what is your plan to resolve the Iran nuclear crisis (if it is a crisis at all?)

quote:

Originally posted by George Smiley And what is the EU doin wrong? And what is your plan to resolve the Iran nuclear crisis (if it is a crisis at all?)

Have you been reading anything about it?

quote:

Sunday, May 1, 2005 - Page updated at 12:00 a.m. Iran plans to resume uranium activities By Ali Akbar Dareini The Associated Press TEHRAN, Iran � Iran said yesterday it is likely to resume uranium enrichment-related activities within a week, a process it halted last year to build confidence in talks with European countries and avoid referral to the U.N. Security Council for possible sanctions. Tehran's announcement came a day after talks in London with European negotiators yielded no results. France, Britain and Germany, acting on behalf of the 25-nation European Union, are seeking guarantees from Iran that it will not use its nuclear program to make weapons, as Washington suspects. Top Iranian nuclear negotiator Hasan Rowhani was quoted as saying Tehran expects to restart enrichment activities � injecting uranium gas into centrifuges � at its uranium conversion facility in Isfahan. The central cities of Natanz and Isfahan house the heart of Iran's nuclear program. The Isfahan conversion facility reprocesses uranium-ore concentrate into gas, which is then taken to Natanz and fed into the centrifuges for enrichment. In Vienna, Austria, a senior diplomat close to the International Atomic Energy Agency said the U.N. nuclear-watchdog body had not been informed of Tehran's intention.

>>Source<<

Why wouldn't Iran bother telling the U.N. about it's intentions if in fact they are truthful, with nothing to hide?
I'd sure as hell want to know why...

quote:

Originally posted by Fir3start3r Have you been reading anything about it? >>Source<< Why wouldn't Iran bother telling the U.N. about it's intentions if in fact they are truthful, with nothing to hide? I'd sure as hell want to know why...

I said what are the EU doing wrong, and as far as I am concerned they are going about it the right way. Iran is playing games like North Korea to see what they can get and how far they can push. I also asked what your solution to this problem would be. Baring in mind that America does not have the means to mount another Iraq-style military operation for years, and that ultimately, as far as Iran is concerned (esp with internal dissent) the EU has a far greater weapon in sanctions. Of course there is the possibility of an airstrike, not invasion. But you dont get any oil that way!

quote:

Originally posted by zig or how about North Korea, the Americans are going to be very busy... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/as...fic/4503531.stm

yah, as if that wasn't enough
Iraq, Afghan wars reportedly strain U.S. fighting ability

quote:

Originally posted by George Smiley I said what are the EU doing wrong, and as far as I am concerned they are going about it the right way.

I never did say they were doing anything wrong?
The posted image clearly indicates that the EU must have be going in circles trying to convince Iran of some assurances.

quote:

I also asked what your solution to this problem would be. Baring in mind that America does not have the means to mount another Iraq-style military operation for years, and that ultimately, as far as Iran is concerned (esp with internal dissent) the EU has a far greater weapon in sanctions. Of course there is the possibility of an airstrike, not invasion. But you dont get any oil that way!

Solution? It's simple; Iran should just simply have let the world know of it's intentions...how hard can it be?
And why would I care about oil? We have a $50 Billion dollar projecting going on here in Canada.

quote:

Originally posted by Fir3start3r I never did say they were doing anything wrong? The posted image clearly indicates that the EU must have be going in circles trying to convince Iran of some assurances.

I was refering to "Have you been reading anything about it?"

quote:

Solution? It's simple; Iran should just simply have let the world know of it's intentions...how hard can it be? And why would I care about oil? We have a $50 Billion dollar projecting going on here in Canada.

Canadian, American, you all look the same to me!

The US used its "new" nuclear technology to bomb Japan and end WWII. That technology is not so new these days and we're faced with perpetually persuading third world countries who are catching up not to use the WWII technology. I doubt if we can be successful in the long run with countries intent on joining the nuclear club.


[[[smoke]]]

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.