
TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- cuba's politics
Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Posted by stk on May-23-2005 00:58:
cuba's politics
I nkow that cuba is a communist country...but my friend told me the other day that cuba has really good politics..
What are the strenghts of cuba's politics?
and wat are the weaknesses?
Posted by Yoepus on May-23-2005 02:28:
What politics?
Posted by St_Andrew on May-23-2005 04:29:
What cuba? 
Posted by Capitalizt on May-23-2005 12:52:
answer
You are a socialist revolutionary! You are happy. You love Fidel!
If you disagree, you die!
ha ha! Isn't it great comrade?

Posted by George Smiley on May-23-2005 13:26:
Re: answer
| quote: |
Originally posted by Capitalizt
You are a socialist revolutionary! You are happy. You love Fidel!
If you disagree, you die!
ha ha! Isn't it great comrade?
|
You are a brain dead moron - you are happy!
If your not, and can see whats going on under your very own nose, we label you unpatriotic, and then nobody believes you!
And just incase that doesn't work we change the laws, taking away 100s of years of American values and freedoms (we'll call it something catchy like a Patriot act so people will think its somehow in line with American values) and redefine you as a terrorist and lock you away!
ha! ha! Isn't it great neo-con?
Posted by Yoepus on May-23-2005 15:37:
Re: Re: answer
| quote: |
Originally posted by George Smiley
You are a brain dead moron - you are happy!
If your not, and can see whats going on under your very own nose, we label you unpatriotic, and then nobody believes you!
And just incase that doesn't work we change the laws, taking away 100s of years of American values and freedoms (we'll call it something catchy like a Patriot act so people will think its somehow in line with American values) and redefine you as a terrorist and lock you away!
ha! ha! Isn't it great neo-con? |
I like how the British make fun of the Patriot Act when in reality their laws are much more repressive and take away much more rights of their citizens then the Americans do of theirs..
To bad they don't have a catchy name for it....
Posted by Sid on May-23-2005 15:58:
Re: Re: Re: answer
| quote: |
Originally posted by Yoepus
I like how the British make fun of the Patriot Act when in reality their laws are much more repressive and take away much more rights of their citizens then the Americans do of theirs..
To bad they don't have a catchy name for it.... |
Mordechai Vanunu
Posted by George Smiley on May-23-2005 16:43:
Re: Re: Re: answer
| quote: |
Originally posted by Yoepus
I like how the British make fun of the Patriot Act when in reality their laws are much more repressive and take away much more rights of their citizens then the Americans do of theirs..
To bad they don't have a catchy name for it.... |
Sorry could you point to my post defending British anti-terrorist laws?
Posted by Yoepus on May-23-2005 16:49:
Re: Re: Re: Re: answer
| quote: |
Originally posted by George Smiley
Sorry could you point to my post defending British anti-terrorist laws? |
I don't know that you have, I'm just pointing out that is is hypocrtical how the British (and other Europeans) critize the USA for the patriot act when they do not critize or critize less their own governments that encated similar laws years if not decades earlier then the USA.
Posted by Yoepus on May-23-2005 16:49:
Re: Re: Re: Re: answer
| quote: |
Originally posted by S_madis
Mordechai Vanunu
|
..is a crazy lunatic, and your point is?
Posted by George Smiley on May-23-2005 17:27:
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: answer
| quote: |
Originally posted by Yoepus
I don't know that you have, I'm just pointing out that is is hypocrtical how the British (and other Europeans) critize the USA for the patriot act when they do not critize or critize less their own governments that encated similar laws years if not decades earlier then the USA. |
To be fair this thread is the first time I have mentioned the Patriot Act...
Posted by Capitalizt on May-23-2005 19:54:
Re: Re: answer
| quote: |
Originally posted by George Smiley
You are a brain dead moron - you are happy!
If your not, and can see whats going on under your very own nose, we label you unpatriotic, and then nobody believes you!
And just incase that doesn't work we change the laws, taking away 100s of years of American values and freedoms (we'll call it something catchy like a Patriot act so people will think its somehow in line with American values) and redefine you as a terrorist and lock you away!
ha! ha! Isn't it great neo-con? |
ha! ha! I love how you assume I am a neocon simply because I don't like communist dictatorships. Very funny!
ha ha!
Posted by George Smiley on May-23-2005 20:13:
Re: Re: Re: answer
| quote: |
Originally posted by Capitalizt
ha! ha! I love how you assume I am a neocon simply because I don't like communist dictatorships. Very funny!
ha ha!
|
Why what is your political ideology?
And why, after all this time, are you still incapable of learning what communism and socialism actually mean?
Posted by brashy on May-23-2005 20:19:
Fidel Castro is one of the best politicians the world has ever had the chance to witness throughout its history. He is a revolutionary man, that has defended the Cuban nation against all its intern or outtern opponents, and has succeded in becoming a respected leader, that leads his country with dignity.
Posted by George Smiley on May-23-2005 20:32:
| quote: |
Originally posted by brashy
Fidel Castro is one of the best politicians the world has ever had the chance to witness throughout its history. He is a revolutionary man, that has defended the Cuban nation against all its intern or outtern opponents, and has succeded in becoming a respected leader, that leads his country with dignity. |
Er...think you might just be pushing it a little bit too far there...
Posted by shaolin_Z on May-23-2005 20:48:
| quote: |
Originally posted by George Smiley
Er...think you might just be pushing it a little bit too far there... |
Agreed. I've heard some pretty harsh critism of Fidel and his regime from some cubans.
Posted by brashy on May-23-2005 20:51:
| quote: |
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
Agreed. I've heard some pretty harsh critism of Fidel and his regime from some cubans. |
There is nothing like a perfect politician. But if you put in balance the pluses and the minuses, Cubans are better off with him
Posted by George Smiley on May-23-2005 21:37:
| quote: |
Originally posted by brashy
There is nothing like a perfect politician. But if you put in balance the pluses and the minuses, Cubans are better off with him |
There's a huge gap between "perfect" and "dictatorship"!!
So, as for the "pluses and minuses"...
Can you share the pluses with us?
And are you also arguing that Cubans are better off under this system than they would be under liberal or social democracy?
Posted by Yoepus on May-23-2005 23:10:
| quote: |
Originally posted by George Smiley
And are you also arguing that Cubans are better off under this system than they would be under liberal or social democracy? |
Yea, it really is quiet amazing that someone can argue that people are better off in a "fear society" than a "free society".
All dictatorships, no matter how benevolent are worse off for the people than free societies. Unless they are a transitional government into democracy or an accountable government, dicators must use fear to control their populace and stay in place of power.
Posted by St_Andrew on May-23-2005 23:29:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Yoepus
All dictatorships, no matter how benevolent are worse off for the people than free societies. Unless they are a transitional government into democracy or an accountable government, dicators must use fear to control their populace and stay in place of power. |
That is not necisarily true tho, first of all, at least in theory a dictatorship can be much better than democracy for many reasons, and second of all, there are many instances where a democracy have used fear in order to stay in power to (read George W Bush
).
All that said, democracy is a lot better than dictatorships in general, but i wouldnt go so far as to say that "All dictatorships, no matter how benevolent" are worse than a democracy.
Posted by Yoepus on May-24-2005 03:21:
| quote: |
Originally posted by St_Andrew
All that said, democracy is a lot better than dictatorships in general, but i wouldnt go so far as to say that "All dictatorships, no matter how benevolent" are worse than a democracy. |
Its all a perspective of time. If you look at it in a span of decades then liberal democracy always trumps dictatorships.
Given your G W Bush example, assuming he's the worst guy, uses fear, etc, he's out and replaced in 8 years. Theres a houst, a senate, a judicary all to counter-balance his powers. There is a free and open press (who critizes him non-stop) and people don't get shot, killed, or arrested for expressing their opinions.
Now in a dictatorship if it to exist more than a number of years it must oppress its own citizens by curtailing the freedom of speech and press. If it does not do this, the tide will simply turn against the dictator and it will eventually evolve into a democracy.
Under George Bush's democracy I can say "fuck George Bush, go to hell you fucking sleaze bag" and I will get applause. In Cuba if I say "fuck Fidel Castro, he's a fucking sleeze bag who should go to hell", I get a bullet in the head.
I don't care how good the quality of life is, without that fundamental ability to express your own opinion, you are simply not a free man. We take this freedom for granted because we have always known it, we have grown up with it, and know no different. It is incomprehensible to us to realize a world where what you say can kill you.
Posted by St_Andrew on May-24-2005 03:32:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Yoepus
Its all a perspective of time. If you look at it in a span of decades then liberal democracy always trumps dictatorships.
Given your G W Bush example, assuming he's the worst guy, uses fear, etc, he's out and replaced in 8 years. Theres a houst, a senate, a judicary all to counter-balance his powers. There is a free and open press (who critizes him non-stop) and people don't get shot, killed, or arrested for expressing their opinions.
Now in a dictatorship if it to exist more than a number of years it must oppress its own citizens by curtailing the freedom of speech and press. If it does not do this, the tide will simply turn against the dictator and it will eventually evolve into a democracy.
Under George Bush's democracy I can say "fuck George Bush, go to hell you fucking sleaze bag" and I will get applause. In Cuba if I say "fuck Fidel Castro, he's a fucking sleeze bag who should go to hell", I get a bullet in the head.
I don't care how good the quality of life is, without that fundamental ability to express your own opinion, you are simply not a free man. We take this freedom for granted because we have always known it, we have grown up with it, and know no different. It is incomprehensible to us to realize a world where what you say can kill you. |
I did never say that Cuba is a better country than the US to live in (that would be an insane thing to say, for the obvious reasons you stated), however I stated that a democracy doesnt have to be better than a dictatorship.
Imagine two Countries, country A where a dictator rules, and Country B where Democracy rules.
In country A, El Presidento have been ruling for several years, he is a very good man, although he has never been voted there he is still always working for the good of the country. He takes care of corruption, he dares to take the decions that the people might not like, but is best for the country in the long run etc. El Presidento also makes sure that everyone can have their opinion, and no one can get shot for saying the wrong thing, and they can try to affect El Presidento, and he does change if you have good arguments, but you simply cant vote him out.
Meanwhile in country B, Mr Democrato is ruling, he has just been elected for a 4 year term, and he must do everything to make sure he stays in power. To do this he is always making sure the people are happy, in the short run, but since he know that the ppl of country b is a pretty stupid ppl, he cant take the vital long term decions that would be bad in the short term, cause then he wouldnt get reelected. He also starts a lot of wars with other countries since Mr Democrato knows that this is a way of keeping the country together, and securing his second term in office.
Which is the best country to live in? Country A i would say, cause it is the country that is going to be better of in the long run, and you wont have to be affraid of everything.
Its kinda theoretical, but get my point?
Posted by ShadoWolf on May-24-2005 06:40:
| quote: |
Originally posted by brashy
Fidel Castro is one of the best politicians the world has ever had the chance to witness throughout its history. He is a revolutionary man, that has defended the Cuban nation against all its intern or outtern opponents, and has succeded in becoming a respected leader, that leads his country with dignity. |
What about the fact that he's stolen millions from the Cuban people?
Or that he conspired to kill millions of Americans with nuclear weapons?
Posted by tathi on May-24-2005 07:17:
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: answer
| quote: |
Originally posted by Yoepus
..is a crazy lunatic, and your point is? |
We can't all be paragons of sanity and altruism like the benevolent Hussein, Osama, Sharon, et al
Posted by tathi on May-24-2005 07:19:
If anyone wants to read a brilliant book set in Cuba by one of the greatest authors of the 20th century go no further than Grahame Greene - Our Man in Havana

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.