tONKPROJECT - TRIPLE MISTAKE (64kb)

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Producers Promotion
-- tONKPROJECT - TRIPLE MISTAKE (64kb)

Posted by tonkproject on Jul-24-2005 13:55:

tONKPROJECT - TRIPLE MISTAKE (64kb)

any feedback is welcome

ENJOY

Posted by tonkproject on Jul-25-2005 21:14:

WHY DO I GET SO MANY FEEDBACKS WHEN I'M POSTING IN THIS SECTION...CMMON LADS...DONT BE SHY

Posted by Mr Rogers on Jul-25-2005 21:52:

I'll be honest man...i thought ur tune was gonna suck with those comments u made...but a very kick ass track...lotta energy.
the 64 thing has gotta go, no one hear (besides me i guess) will listen to your track at this low qual.
nice track though....break is a bit to simple for me but thats about it

Posted by tonkproject on Jul-25-2005 22:57:

quote:
Originally posted by kopi_luwak
Meh... U made me lost any lil interest I could had to listen to ur 64 KBS track with this sentence mate.

Kopi =o.

mate,chill...no ofense...

Posted by tonkproject on Jul-27-2005 20:38:

well...it seems that i upset to many ppl...

Posted by Massive84 on Jul-27-2005 21:07:

i don't wanne start a flamewar or anything.

Am very curious why you put something up in 64kb? if you say labels, then your signed to the wrong label my friend.

Posted by tonkproject on Jul-27-2005 21:13:

stop bitch'in around...that's the last time....forget'it.and i'm not your friend,by the way.....

Posted by Massive84 on Jul-27-2005 21:15:

quote:
Originally posted by tonkproject
stop bitch'in around...that's the last time....forget'it.and i'm not your friend,by the way.....

i was just asking it nicely.

But oke you proofed your attitude.

FUCK OFF FROM THIS FORUM then.

Shithead

Posted by tonkproject on Jul-27-2005 21:19:

aren't you the top **** on earth ... i bet you stay sharp in front of the comp and just refresh the page...waiting for my replay...

as my response to your ofenses i would say

GOODBYE

Posted by tonkproject on Jul-28-2005 11:48:

well....when i write "WHY DO I GET SO MANY FEEDBACKS WHEN I'M POSTING IN THIS SECTION...CMMON LADS...DONT BE SHY" i didnt want acctually to upset nobody.i dont know why you felt that but anyway my point was to move the topic from the second page to 1.not to worry i will not post ever again in this section since ppl like you and massive84 are "owning" the place.
anyway i would consider a closed thread since none of the posts refere to the song.

Posted by Sinnica Hax on Jul-28-2005 18:55:

omg this is sweet, however I dont really like the bassound that comes at 0:42, doesnt seem to fit into the song as a while IMO at least but apart from that I find this track very appealing
You have put all sounds into good use in this song imo, well done except for that bass

Posted by tonkproject on Jul-28-2005 19:05:

quote:
Originally posted by >>FK
omg this is sweet, however I dont really like the bassound that comes at 0:42, doesnt seem to fit into the song as a while IMO at least but apart from that I find this track very appealing
You have put all sounds into good use in this song imo, well done except for that bass

well mate thanx a lot ... seems to me that you haven't felt so ofended by my 64kb vers or my "atitude"...

CHEERS

Posted by Sinnica Hax on Jul-28-2005 19:09:

not at all, eventhough its 64kbps you can still hear how the song is, so I dont know what the fuss is about more important to me how a song is built, rather then quality of the sounds itself or how you say
plus, now we know what to expect when it comes (hopefully) in higher quality

Posted by Sinnica Hax on Jul-28-2005 19:26:

BTW, its rather the bassound I dont like, not the location of it, perhaps try some other bassounds for that sequense that starts off at 0:42 that might fit in better but maybe its just me =p

Posted by Massive84 on Jul-28-2005 20:19:

quote:
Originally posted by tonkproject
well mate thanx a lot ... seems to me that you haven't felt so ofended by my 64kb vers or my "atitude"...

CHEERS

obviously then, you thought you offended me..lol?

I was asking a GENERAL question to you. And maaybe you should reply with a decent answer next time.

no i don't own TA..if i did many things on this section would be different.

Posted by tonkproject on Jul-28-2005 21:23:

i didnt thought...the way you replayed first showed like you felt more than offended.anyway....you still own me an quick feedback

Posted by tonkproject on Jul-28-2005 21:33:

quote:
Originally posted by >>FK
BTW, its rather the bassound I dont like, not the location of it, perhaps try some other bassounds for that sequense that starts off at 0:42 that might fit in better but maybe its just me =p

it is right that the bass sounds a little bit out the track but that was my intention ... it does give a tricky thing until the saw is entering.the track it is mastered and sent already ... but i will try that and maybe something nicer will come'out...

cheers

Posted by Massive84 on Jul-28-2005 22:17:

quote:
Originally posted by tonkproject
i didnt thought...the way you replayed first showed like you felt more than offended.anyway....you still own me an quick feedback

very well.

Good start, nice perc. Driving .

the transition is at 1.37 is nice, increases more drive, however this happens to fast. build it a bit. At 1.37 you should remove the kick and perc and filter up that low octave saw with the plucky stabs.

1.52 nice reverse clap there, good delay usage.

I am liking the bass here.

The break isn't doing it for me, the sounds are quite nice but i miss the conection to the theme.

Alright your going for pure progressive with nice sounds and a driving beat, i dig that but i do feel that the break could be shorter then.

imo it's a nice tune, and i recognize the pluck from the last tune you posted here but couldn't finish because of an file error or something? i liked the other one more but this one is different, less melodic.

Nice tune for the clubs, good luck with it

Posted by stevieboy32808 on Jul-28-2005 23:27:

It's quite bland in my opinion. The breakdown is way too long and I recommend shortening it. But if you want to keep it long then add more elements to it such as percussions or synths to make the track less boring. My main point is that this song needs more substance.

As far as the 64kbps encoding. I could care less. I'm sure you probably did that to prevent bootlegging. I would have done the same also.

Posted by tonkproject on Jul-28-2005 23:28:

100% right mate....the breack it is like from another tune and the only thing that connect them is the pluck...anyway thanx a lot for your feedback...