TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Can the United States establish a stable, democratic government in Iraq?
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by ogvh5150 on Jul-27-2005 15:32:

Can the United States establish a stable, democratic government in Iraq?

Can the United States establish a stable, democratic government in Iraq?

Yes or No?

Flames welcome but be on topic.

Discuss but please vote.

Other related polls:
Can the United States establish a stable, democratic government in Iraq?
Did the Bush administration deliberately mislead the public of Saddams WMD'S?
Can the United States win the war in Iraq?
United States in Iraq Poll: Leave or stay


Posted by Krypton on Jul-27-2005 20:43:

different place, different people, different beliefs, different time. eventually, theyll succumb back to a theocracy or dictatorship. there is not one democratically elected government in the entire middle east. and there never is going to be one.


Posted by Q5echo on Jul-27-2005 22:13:

yes, because there has never been a democratically elected government int he middle east.


Posted by Krypton on Jul-27-2005 22:58:

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
yes, because there has never been a democratically elected government int he middle east.


so what makes you think this one will work?


Posted by Kapedano on Jul-27-2005 23:08:

quote:
Originally posted by ::TranceVanDyk::
different place, different people, different beliefs, different time. eventually, theyll succumb back to a theocracy or dictatorship. there is not one democratically elected government in the entire middle east. and there never is going to be one.


Never say never .


Posted by Kapedano on Jul-27-2005 23:10:

Well we all know that Iraq cant be as democratic as US is, heck No one can, but i think there is a chance they will go on the right path, will take time, there isnt anything that can be done.


Posted by Q5echo on Jul-27-2005 23:56:

quote:
Originally posted by ::TranceVanDyk::
so what makes you think this one will work?

why? because of all of the other democratically elected governments that do work. its time, thats why.

why? because there have been no greater democracies in the history of the world than were born from the barrel of a gun. too many sacrifices have been made by the people who know what is better for them...not you.



i'm being mean. sorry.


Posted by George Smiley on Jul-28-2005 01:22:

quote:
Originally posted by ::TranceVanDyk::
different place, different people, different beliefs, different time. eventually, theyll succumb back to a theocracy or dictatorship. there is not one democratically elected government in the entire middle east. and there never is going to be one.

Apart from Israel, or Turkey, or Lebanon, or Iraq...


Posted by apostrophe on Jul-28-2005 02:16:

Will it work?

I don't think so, at least not anytime soon. There's too much unrest for stability created by the USA in the Middle East. It's obsurd to think that the country populated by a large number extremists that generally hate the Western world will be stabalised into a effective democracy...by...the poster country of Western civilisation.



Even if there are those there that appriciate what the USA is doing.


Posted by Krypton on Jul-28-2005 03:40:

quote:
Originally posted by George Smiley
Apart from Israel, or Turkey, or Lebanon, or Iraq...


two that i count as a stable democracy. two that are all but stable. and more than a dozen others that are rules islamic style. islam is not only a religion, but a way of life, and that also includes the governing bodies.

quote:
why? because of all of the other democratically elected governments that do work. its time, thats why.

why? because there have been no greater democracies in the history of the world than were born from the barrel of a gun. too many sacrifices have been made by the people who know what is better for them...not you.



i'm being mean. sorry..


tell me the ratio of moslim countries that are democratically elected AND stable to those that arent. i was never saying what is better for the iraki people, im just telling you what i think is going to happen. you think its hell right now, once the americans pull out, the islamists are going to launch an all-out offensive.


Posted by apostrophe on Jul-28-2005 03:46:

quote:
Originally posted by ::TranceVanDyk::
tell me the ratio of moslim countries that are democratically elected AND stable to those that arent. i was never saying what is better for the iraki people, im just telling you what i think is going to happen. you think its hell right now, once the americans pull out, the islamists are going to launch an all-out offensive.


I'd say so. The only reason that democracy exists right now, is because there is a superior military force present enforcing it. Following the removal of trops (assuming they EVER leave ) I won't be surprised to see everything go back to how it was, proving once and for all this war on terror and bringing freedome to another country across the world was in fact not the smartest idea ever, and an unneccessary waste of money.

Because we all know that already


Posted by hardcore trancer on Jul-28-2005 05:35:

quote:
Originally posted by gouuryella
Well we all know that Iraq cant be as democratic as US is, heck No one can, but i think there is a chance they will go on the right path, will take time, there isnt anything that can be done.



what if they dont want to be like Fuckin U.S? is that a problem?


Posted by hardcore trancer on Jul-28-2005 05:37:

quote:
Originally posted by apostrophe
I'd say so. The only reason that democracy exists right now, is because there is a superior military force present enforcing it. Following the removal of trops (assuming they EVER leave ) I won't be surprised to see everything go back to how it was, proving once and for all this war on terror and bringing freedome to another country across the world was in fact not the smartest idea ever, and an unneccessary waste of money.



Amen case closed.


Posted by Kapedano on Jul-28-2005 05:54:

quote:
Originally posted by hardcore trancer
what if they dont want to be like Fuckin U.S? is that a problem?


I didnt say they were going to be like the US, i think anyone would love to be free and have a freedom of speach my friend, why are you being so fucking stupid and always againts anything you pathetic fuck. go back to iran thats where you deserve to be, with all of those fucked up people there, or might aswell fight the americans in iraq, i hope somebody fucking kills ur pathetic lame ass there.


Posted by apostrophe on Jul-28-2005 06:07:

quote:
Originally posted by gouuryella
I didnt say they were going to be like the US, i think anyone would love to be free and have a freedom of speach my friend, why are you being so fucking stupid and always againts anything you pathetic fuck. go back to iran thats where you deserve to be, with all of those fucked up people there, or might aswell fight the americans in iraq, i hope somebody fucking kills ur pathetic lame ass there.


What I don't get is why does everyone need what the USA has, freedom of speech etc. Do you realise that for thousands of years, religion has shaped their country, it's government, and it's people? I'm not saying I agree with it, but it's their culture, it's how things are done, the way they have always done.

So I pose this question: Is it ok to destroy and mutilate a culture and it's religion? Fundamentally, this is what the USA is doing. Think early Dutch missionaries in Africa, for example.


Posted by hardcore trancer on Jul-28-2005 06:12:

quote:
Originally posted by gouuryella
I didnt say they were going to be like the US, i think anyone would love to be free and have a freedom of speach my friend, why are you being so fucking stupid and always againts anything you pathetic fuck. go back to iran thats where you deserve to be, with all of those fucked up people there, or might aswell fight the americans in iraq, i hope somebody fucking kills ur pathetic lame ass there.



continue with this pathetic racist attitude and you'll most likely get banned.

p.s with that reply you finally showed how mature you really are and it shows that obviously you are not ready for political discussions.

so get lost or go back to COR


Posted by hardcore trancer on Jul-28-2005 06:15:

quote:
Originally posted by apostrophe
What I don't get is why does everyone need what the USA has, freedom of speech etc. Do you realise that for thousands of years, religion has shaped their country, it's government, and it's people? I'm not saying I agree with it, but it's their culture, it's how things are done, the way they have always done.



Dont even bother dude,he is too young to know things like that,btw very nicely put.

quote:
So I pose this question: Is it ok to destroy and mutilate a culture and it's religion?


you see to them it is all ok,because they are thinking hey we are fighting terrorism and not thinking what the consequences are.


Posted by kush paintings on Jul-28-2005 06:44:

Apostrophe, you make a great point. I believe their religious values get in the way of the democracy we are trying to impose on them, that is an American brand of democracy. I don't understand, why has the U.S. taken it upon themselves to impose upon Iraq and as the trend seems, the rest of the world our way of life? Please, no flamming on the U.S., this is a serious question. Whatever happened to the days of "The business of America is America's business."


Posted by bubble on Jul-28-2005 07:16:

Re: Can the United States establish a stable, democratic government in Iraq?

quote:
Originally posted by ogvh5150
Can the United States establish a stable, democratic government in Iraq?


Probably. For a democracy to be adopted, where it's never existed, it must be supported at the grass roots. It cannot be imposed from the top down. Otherwise, it will not succeed. Given this, i say 'probably' because i believe that a democracy exited prior to SH. In other words, it's not entirely new. But then again, it's still a top down approach.


Posted by apostrophe on Jul-28-2005 08:15:

quote:
Originally posted by kush paintings
Apostrophe, you make a great point. I believe their religious values get in the way of the democracy we are trying to impose on them, that is an American brand of democracy. I don't understand, why has the U.S. taken it upon themselves to impose upon Iraq and as the trend seems, the rest of the world our way of life? Please, no flamming on the U.S., this is a serious question. Whatever happened to the days of "The business of America is America's business."


I grew up in a very international setting, surrounded by different races, cultures and morals. I have Muslim, Arab, Islamic, Chinese, American, Latin, European...etc friends surrounding me, all with different clashing cultural ideas. But yet in my experience, acceptance and understanding bridge the gaps between the difference, and lead to a common solution.

I have great appreciation for other's values and beliefs. Even though myself I am a white kid from the States, I view the USA from a distance, seeing it for it's pros and cons. I see it often as the rest of the world sees it - often times corrupt and inefficient. I agree, what right does the country to assume that it's system is the best? Let's hope somewhere in the future the USA learns to respect other countries politics and ideals even though they differ from their own.

A quick note on the USA trying to spread it's version of democracy. In my opinion, USA's democracy isn't even proper - the country is advertising fair elections, when the US's elections are far from fair! The politicians decide who their party's candidates are, while the public gets little choice in the matter! How hypocritcal is this? Trying to convert an entire countries government when it's own isn't even functioning according to it's founding Fathers??

There are too many in-house issues to be resolved to be prancing around the world sticking their nose in other countries business. I know this has been said before time and time again, but I say it again!


Posted by hardcore trancer on Jul-28-2005 08:45:

Thumbs up

quote:
Originally posted by apostrophe
I agree, what right does the country to assume that it's system is the best? Let's hope somewhere in the future the USA learns to respect other countries politics and ideals even though they differ from their own.

A quick note on the USA trying to spread it's version of democracy. In my opinion, USA's democracy isn't even proper - the country is advertising fair elections, when the US's elections are far from fair! The politicians decide who their party's candidates are, while the public gets little choice in the matter! How hypocritcal is this? Trying to convert an entire countries government when it's own isn't even functioning according to it's founding Fathers??

There are too many in-house issues to be resolved to be prancing around the world sticking their nose in other countries business. I know this has been said before time and time again, but I say it again!




Awesome post dude.


we need more open minded people like you in the U.S.


Posted by George Smiley on Jul-28-2005 12:00:

quote:
Originally posted by kush paintings
Apostrophe, you make a great point. I believe their religious values get in the way of the democracy we are trying to impose on them, that is an American brand of democracy. I don't understand, why has the U.S. taken it upon themselves to impose upon Iraq and as the trend seems, the rest of the world our way of life? Please, no flamming on the U.S., this is a serious question.

The exact question I have been doing my dissertation on (and how it will effect Lebanon!)

Basically it is a neoconservative belief that disagrees with the previous American policy of dealing with dictators. Dictators cannot be trusted as they are fundamentally opposed to American values (see the power Saudi Arabia has over America - the neocons absolutely hate the Saudi Regime) That belief is coupled with a plan or ambition to mould a world order that is conductive to American interests which can only be protected in a democratic world. Its a fair belief to be honest but the way they go about it (ie preemptive military action) is imo counterproductive to their aims as it is not democratic and therefore they will have a problem imposing their view if they do not adhere to those same principles. The problem for neocons is that another fundamental (and imo greater belief they put a higher priority on over democracy promotion) is support for Israel.

Anyway, I dont agree that Arabs cannot handle democracy and I believe they want it. There is a base human nature that runs through us all and part of that imo is a desire to have a greater say in how we live our lives and democracy is a path to fulfilling that desire. I think its a completely orientalist view that says Islam is incompatable with democracy cos Christianity and Judaism are just as much incompatable as Islam but they seem to manage fine. Lebanon gives a great example of an Arab culture that has embraced democracy (before the civil war it was a democracy with democratic institutions and beliefs)


Posted by ShadoWolf on Jul-28-2005 15:12:

The U.S. is not establishing the government, the Iraqi people are. The U.S. is only there now for security purposes.


Posted by kush paintings on Jul-28-2005 15:26:

George, do yourself a favor and go read Where the Right Went Wrong. This book is entirely about the neoconservative movement, and how they have come into power in the U.S. The author, Pat Buccahan, makes some very interesting points, especially how the neocons see America as a great empire. These people are twisted, and most of allhave no idea how to run an efficient government. What ever happened to the days of small government?

Apostrophe, I appreciate you sharing all that info, but don't think that your kind of background is neccessary in seeing U.S. the way you do. It just came off that way. If I misunderstood, I am sorry. The people of the U.S. do need a wake-up call. No one sees the U.S. aspirations for empire? Everybody wants to hate Bush and the Republicans, when they should hate Kerry and the Democrats more. Kerry didn't have the balls to come out and say 'We should not have gotten invovled in a war with Iraq'. Perhaps, he too is for American imperialism. I would not rule that out. We didn't find WMDS, Saddam was not aiding terrorists (at least to our knowledge, and if someone were to come up to you a few years ago and say "We are going to invade Iraq to force a democracy upon the country", would you support the war? The Democrats needed to take a hard stance on this issue, which would force people not to simply question can a democracy be formed, but was our presence neccessary in the first place? Furthermore, as apostrophe pointed out, do we not have more pressing issues at home? For once, I would like to see the focus of a president be first, and foremost on improving our lives rather than others.


Posted by Fir3start3r on Jul-28-2005 16:13:

It can work but it's going to be up to the people of Iraq to decide to want it to.
The States will be there for as long as they (the Iraqis) can pull themselves together; something no one else has ever given them the chance to do without some sort of repression.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.