Poll: If Nintendo had to go bankrupt, Should it go to SONY or MICROSOFT?

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Gaming Forum
-- Poll: If Nintendo had to go bankrupt, Should it go to SONY or MICROSOFT?

Posted by SkiesofArcadia on Aug-01-2005 19:14:

Poll: If Nintendo had to go bankrupt, Should it go to SONY or MICROSOFT?

Sony - 1
Microsoft - 0

I think it'll look best for Sony because the Chocobo/Moogle would look best with the Yoshi/Kirby

Posted by InterMilan31 on Aug-01-2005 19:52:

Sony. Im a biased bitch

Posted by Iceferno on Aug-01-2005 21:24:

Sony, because there are so many great RPGs on the PS1/2 and there might be more Nintendo RPGs than just Paper Mario.

Also, imagine a Super Smash Bros. on the PS3! With a load of Final Fantasy characters (and maybe even monsters) and let's not forget the characters from Breath Of Fire (especially BOF4). Fou-Lu on Smash Brothers, that's gotta be good!

Posted by dj_lane on Aug-01-2005 21:57:

It would go 3rd party, not either

Posted by DarkAngel on Aug-01-2005 21:59:

I cast my vote for Sony.

Posted by P4z! on Aug-01-2005 22:19:

Sony.

Posted by Nayil on Aug-02-2005 03:37:

its a sony

Posted by trunks1022 on Aug-02-2005 03:39:

this d00d fricking spams COR with polls too... DA, how can you encourage this?!?!

Posted by Spunky Girl on Aug-02-2005 11:26:

Microsoft gets mine

Posted by Yan on Aug-02-2005 15:23:

LOL. Nintendo won't be going bankrupt for a LOOOOOONG time, if it ever does, that is.

Otherwise, the correct answer is

quote:
Originally posted by dj_lane
It would continue being a 3rd party producer, not either

Well, that's technically speaking, of course. That's if you don't want to consider Nintendo a 1st Party Producer right now.

Posted by big_charm on Aug-02-2005 20:33:

quote:
Originally posted by Yan
LOL. Nintendo won't be going bankrupt for a LOOOOOONG time, if it ever does, that is.

Otherwise, the correct answer is

Well, that's technically speaking, of course. That's if you don't want to consider Nintendo a 1st Party Producer right now.

That's exactly what I was thinking...

Posted by SolaceDj on Aug-15-2005 15:40:

Sony.

Posted by sshyperion on Aug-17-2005 13:38:

MS shouldn't have got into the gaming sector but that's my opinion. They have helped foster competition and enhancements in gaming software and hardware ('cause you know we sooo need another power bar melting or defective buttons being launched or bulky hardware 8-/). In the end *heaven forbid* if Nintendo had to go bankrupt, I'd rather Sony get control of Nintendo's resources and assets. MS can bite me in the gaming sector.

Posted by Spunky Girl on Aug-22-2005 01:11:

Oh damn, i cant vote again

Posted by sshyperion on Aug-22-2005 02:03:

quote:
Originally posted by Spunky Girl
Oh damn, i cant vote again

why would you?

Posted by Spunky Girl on Aug-22-2005 09:25:

quote:
Originally posted by sshyperion
why would you?

MS is doing so bad

Posted by sshyperion on Aug-22-2005 12:41:

quote:
Originally posted by Spunky Girl
MS is doing so bad

LOL! Pity for MS!? Pls don't desire to change your vote because of that. Change your vote because you believe with reason why someone should win . I work at a place that makes money off MS products and I don't even want them to win on this poll

Posted by Cosmic Realm on Aug-22-2005 15:27:

quote:
Originally posted by dj_lane
It would go 3rd party, not either

i cast my vote for sony if i had to choose... but i agree with him

Posted by sshyperion on Aug-22-2005 15:28:

quote:
Originally posted by Cosmic Realm
i cast my vote for sony if i had to choose... but i agree with him

Panasonic anyone? or Sega perhaps