TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Producers Promotion
-- They say trance music over...


Posted by clubzero on Dec-11-2001 12:34:

They say trance music over...

"...well, nothing is over. Trance music is still alive... Clubbers from all over the world... unite.... I believe in trance... we are the one with the machine... I am one.."

These are some of the lyrics of "Tranceunity". Listen at www.mp3.com/clubzero and feel the unity.

CZ


Posted by clubzero on Dec-13-2001 13:49:

Oh You. There's no trance addicts here! Proove me wrong and listen the song.

CZ


Posted by Pjotr G on Dec-13-2001 14:01:

I don't have to prove you anything. And I don't care if you think I like trance or not. This ain't helpin to get people to listen to your stuff (not me at least)


Posted by clubzero on Dec-13-2001 14:04:

Sorry about that. I just thought a song called Tranceunity, which is already signed to Boost Records would actually interest someone HERE... get my point. It's frustrating with 0 replies.. I worked on the song for a month in my studio so... I'm sure you understand.

CZ


Posted by Icone on Dec-13-2001 15:38:

:)

Don't take it wrong from all people there clubzero

I think as long there's views of your topic, there's a good chance people are listening, however they don't post replies... Just wait and see

This is the case with me I think, I don't get many replies all of the time (mazybe I should try to get better topic-titles that attract people) - but I don't blame anyone... People are free to do whatever they want over here, as long as you keep in mind that people can 'view' without 'replying' it should be ok
I do it too sometimes. So don't worry

Byez,
Lightworks


Posted by Fatboy on Dec-13-2001 20:59:

I took the time to download your tune, and it was actually pretty good The problem was that my expectations were VERY high after reading a few of your billion reviews. It didn't quite live up to that.

Some constructive critisism:

Try varying your song a little. Although it were onlny 6:40 and is a trance tune, it got repetetive.
Sound quality is actually very good, but the song sounds pretty "standard" if you know what I mean. Try creating something that makes it stand out.

Well, only trying to help Keep up the good work..

Peace


Posted by clubzero on Dec-17-2001 14:06:

Thanks for the replies so far. The reason with the the song being "standard" is that Boost Records told me what they want. So I had to make some changes and make it the way THEY like it... sucks but what r u gonna do.. Anyway thanks. Most of the reviews are from trance listeners so you might see some biased opinions..

Club Zero


Posted by RavingLunatic on Dec-18-2001 00:35:

well, a few things. first off, I agree your saying the song was so good, gave me high expectations.. and after listening, it was OK, but did not live up to my expectations..

whereas other people just say, hey check out my track, and then let the music speak for itself.

another thing, not everyone replies, these forums are so slow, sometimes it isn't even worth it.

and finally, you altered your track becuase the label asked you to? well, then your a sellout. sorry, no offense, but if you love this music so much, then just make what sounds good, don't let other people restrain you.


Posted by randummboy on Dec-18-2001 01:05:

raving lunatic.. i'm sure if you had a record deal too, and you were an upcoming artist, you would change your track for a release.. cut the guy some slack.. as soon as he gets into the scene more, he'll go back and discover himself again..


Posted by Peter Campbell on Dec-18-2001 03:56:

Re: They say trance music over...

quote:
Originally posted by clubzero
"...well, nothing is over. Trance music is still alive... Clubbers from all over the world... unite.... I believe in trance... we are the one with the machine... I am one.."

These are some of the lyrics of "Tranceunity". Listen at www.mp3.com/clubzero and feel the unity.

CZ



Hi clubzero I quite liked your Track "Tranceunity". Your song righting is good.
I don't know how long you have been producing for but a few things
stand out a mile.
If I was Boost Records I would tell you rearrange the songs construction and master the track.

Build the track up have long brake have the body then a short
brake, back to the body then a brake down and finish.

Take the female vocals away from the start, have the song build then
put the female vocals in the first break with some nice pads.
only use the male vocal in the second break, make it short then straight back into the main melody.

Master the track it sounds weak and flat and add some Reverb and heaps of compression


Posted by clubzero on Dec-18-2001 11:04:

Hey thanks for the replies guys. What exactly do you mean here by mastering...? Umm, I took the song to a mastering studio and they called back to me saying "What exactly do you want us to do with the song, it sounds perfect as it is". So I got the CD back the way it was in the first place.... Do you have any suggestions for programs I should use since the mastering engineers thought it was good?

Raving Lunatic, well if I hadn't made the changes they wouldn't even have considered releasing it so...

Club Zero

Ps. Some1 asked this, I've been producing since '95. I don't use hardware so u gotta note that.


Posted by Peter Campbell on Dec-18-2001 11:54:

quote:
Originally posted by clubzero
Hey thanks for the replies guys. What exactly do you mean here by mastering...? Umm, I took the song to a mastering studio and they called back to me saying "What exactly do you want us to do with the song, it sounds perfect as it is". So I got the CD back the way it was in the first place.... Do you have any suggestions for programs I should use since the mastering engineers thought it was good?



I will try and master it for you tomorrow and up it to some web space.

BTW don't send your track there to be mastered again.


Posted by clubzero on Dec-18-2001 12:00:

Hey thanks! I'll add you to the song credits if that works. I'll be waiting.

Club Zero


Posted by Peter Campbell on Dec-18-2001 13:28:

quote:
Originally posted by clubzero
Hey thanks! I'll add you to the song credits if that works. I'll be waiting.

Club Zero


I'm uploading now, give me 5 mins from when you read this, then download it. its only a 10 min job, you should notice how much brighter and louder it is now. some audio quilty was lost due to encoding and decoding form the mp3

dowloal at FAW

CLICK HERE
user:daveb
pass:remix

it should say Mixdown

a few things its not real good decoding a mp3 then encoding it back
again. you start to lose to much quilty
if you want me to do it for real I will need the wav file, master it then let you PM3 it, cause I'm sure you want to put it on CD. so it
has to be done in wav.

and yea sure put my name in the credits


Posted by clubzero on Dec-18-2001 20:54:

I downloaded the file. Yes the beat and the bass sound much richer, but I noticed how the encoding/decoding does lower the quality alot. The samples tend to "shiver" and sound all weird. Maybe I'll join the "Files Anywhere" and upload the .wav file. Would it make a big difference, I didn't like the low quality at all with mixdown.mp3.

By the way, thanks for taking the time to master my stuff..

CZ


Posted by clubzero on Dec-18-2001 20:58:

I downloaded the file. Yes the beat and the bass sound much richer, but I noticed how the encoding/decoding does lower the quality alot. The samples tend to "shiver" and sound all weird. Maybe I'll join the "Files Aynwhere" and upload the .wav file. Would it make a big difference, I didn't like the low quality at all with mixdown.mp3.

By the way, thanks for taking the time to master my stuff..

CZ



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.