
TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Sig Editing
Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Posted by TheNobleEu on Aug-11-2005 16:50:
Sig Editing
Who's editing the sigs lately?
Not sure how, but somehow mine (which I have had ever since I've been here), is suddenly in violation of some nebulous rule #5, which I can't find any reference to.
Oh ye who are editing sigs anonymously, show thyself.
Posted by George Smiley on Aug-11-2005 16:52:
I think the rule you're refering to states that sigs cannot be political
Posted by TheNobleEu on Aug-11-2005 16:54:
| quote: |
Originally posted by George Smiley
I think the rule you're refering to states that sigs cannot be political |
Non-political sigs in a political forum. Gotcha.
Now where would one perchance find said rule? It isn't in the FAQ; while #5 deals with sigs, it outlines no such rule.
Posted by St_Andrew on Aug-11-2005 17:02:
ask yoepus, he might know....
Posted by Yoepus on Aug-11-2005 17:36:
| quote: |
Originally posted by St_Andrew
ask yoepus, he might know.... |
Yea I do
Anyway, join the club. Who can venture a guess how Zionist Mustard is political might be able to explain how a Noble EU (I've never heard of such a thing!) is quiet political.
Anyway to find these obscure rules go to:
Profile -> Edit Profile ->
Click here to Use the Advanced Signature Editor
*Click above link to review the Signature Guidelines
There you wile find the rules which read:
"
Signature Guidelines
1) Keep Nudity to a minimum (sure, there's nothing wrong with it but some people go to extremes)
2) No Images/Banners advertising allowed (web sites/products/etc.) - one line of text with a link is allowed. If it is a site that caters to electronica listeners then it MUST have a link to TranceAddict in it's links area.
3) If you include a list of items or a lot of text in your signature then consider changing the font size to Small from the drop down box above the editor.
4) Keep animated GIFs to a minimum
5) No Political/religion related commentary/imagery
6) Thanks for reading the above - now go be creative with your sig.
Image Restrictions
Max Size: 50,000 bytes (Cumulative TOTAL for ALL images in sig)
Max Height: 150 (Cumulative Total for ALL images in sig)
Max Width: 500 (Cumulative Total for ALL images in sig)"
Please join the "Free Mustard Alliance" and put a stop to Swamper taking away our beloved sigs!
Posted by TheNobleEu on Aug-11-2005 17:41:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Yoepus
Anyway, join the club. |
I will (see below).
| quote: |
Originally posted by Yoepus
Please join the "Free Mustard Alliance" and put a stop to Swamper taking away our beloved sigs! |
Whoa there ketchup-tzar, I very highly doubt this has anything to do with Swamper.
Cheers,
-N
Posted by shaolin_Z on Aug-11-2005 17:47:

Posted by Yoepus on Aug-11-2005 17:55:
| quote: |
Originally posted by TheNobleEu
Whoa there ketchup-tzar, I very highly doubt this has anything to do with Swamper.
|
Well Swamper claimed responsibility for not liking mustard. So its just a hunch. It might very well be his wicked side kick, wicked-neo or his rasta wielding, religious-sig-tauting assistant Lira.
I like the signature (welcome to the alliance!), however if you want to avoid it from being baned I would suggest you add some slight nudity, which is clearly allowed.
Posted by occrider on Aug-11-2005 21:16:
| quote: |
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
|
Sarcasm ... check
Mockery ... check
Humor ... check
I like!
Posted by Arbiter on Aug-11-2005 22:17:
Apparently the boards are largely populated with little children who need to be shielded from anything that they might find disagreeable in the sacrosanct realms of politics and religion.
It's a shame, but what can one do?
Posted by Yoepus on Aug-11-2005 23:47:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Arbiter
It's a shame, but what can one do? |
Ban a mod?
That's what I say!
Posted by Goashem on Aug-12-2005 01:07:
| quote: |
Originally posted by St_Andrew
ask yoepus, he might know.... |
hey mind if i steal your sig and use it on these forums?
Posted by George Smiley on Aug-12-2005 01:14:
Actually, while were on about banning political sigs (presumably cos they cause offense) I would like to propose the following flags are also banned for causing me offence...
France
That shall be all
Posted by St_Andrew on Aug-12-2005 01:14:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Goashem
hey mind if i steal your sig and use it on these forums? |
Haha no, of course not!
Posted by Goashem on Aug-12-2005 01:22:
| quote: |
Originally posted by St_Andrew
Haha no, of course not! |
uh....uhh....
Posted by St_Andrew on Aug-12-2005 01:25:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Goashem
uh....uhh.... |
Nice sig man 
I might change it slightly tho make it a bit more appealing, but nothing majorly
Posted by BadBadNeil on Aug-12-2005 01:58:
Just noticed mine got edited too. Good idea Goashem
I might "borrow your idea"
I wonder who was complaining...
Posted by shaolin_Z on Aug-12-2005 02:03:
| quote: |
Originally posted by BadBadNeil
Just noticed mine got edited too. Good idea Goashem I might "borrow your idea"
I wonder who was complaining... |
People scared of discussing politics/religion. No, not just scared of discussing, but even having the slightest exposure to it.
Posted by Yoepus on Aug-12-2005 02:05:
| quote: |
Originally posted by BadBadNeil
Just noticed mine got edited too. Good idea Goashem I might "borrow your idea"
I wonder who was complaining... |
Well goddamnit justice be served! Your signature was the most offensive of them all, religious and political! how unbearable
Posted by shaolin_Z on Aug-12-2005 02:09:
Quick question about the "alliance" sigs/avatars. Did this all start with the Markus Schulz alliance or something? What's the history behind it? Please enlighten me.
Posted by BadBadNeil on Aug-12-2005 02:13:
Will just have to use my backup sig until I think of something creative.
Posted by Yoepus on Aug-12-2005 02:19:
| quote: |
Originally posted by St_Andrew
Nice sig man 
I might change it slightly tho make it a bit more appealing, but nothing majorly |
I disagree with your sig. I believe it is too politica and does not have enough mustard in it. Please fix it or I will ask a mod to ban you (and may I add, nanny-nanny-poo-poo)
Damn insurgent rebels, the empire will never fall. Ketchup for all!
Posted by shaolin_Z on Aug-12-2005 02:23:
Neil, your new sig is too tripy and is really missing with my head.
Posted by trancaholic on Aug-12-2005 02:30:
It's really missing? And with your head??? Wow, that's got to be the coolest signature ever.
Posted by BadBadNeil on Aug-12-2005 02:31:
| quote: |
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
Neil, your new sig is too tripy and is really missing with my head. |
I hope I don't break the trippy rule 
If you think this small one is trippy, you should see the full size one!
Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.