TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Sig Editing
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by TheNobleEu on Aug-11-2005 16:50:

Sig Editing

Who's editing the sigs lately?

Not sure how, but somehow mine (which I have had ever since I've been here), is suddenly in violation of some nebulous rule #5, which I can't find any reference to.

Oh ye who are editing sigs anonymously, show thyself.


Posted by George Smiley on Aug-11-2005 16:52:

I think the rule you're refering to states that sigs cannot be political


Posted by TheNobleEu on Aug-11-2005 16:54:

quote:
Originally posted by George Smiley
I think the rule you're refering to states that sigs cannot be political


Non-political sigs in a political forum. Gotcha.

Now where would one perchance find said rule? It isn't in the FAQ; while #5 deals with sigs, it outlines no such rule.


Posted by St_Andrew on Aug-11-2005 17:02:

ask yoepus, he might know....


Posted by Yoepus on Aug-11-2005 17:36:

quote:
Originally posted by St_Andrew
ask yoepus, he might know....


Yea I do

Anyway, join the club. Who can venture a guess how Zionist Mustard is political might be able to explain how a Noble EU (I've never heard of such a thing!) is quiet political.

Anyway to find these obscure rules go to:
Profile -> Edit Profile ->
Click here to Use the Advanced Signature Editor
*Click above link to review the Signature Guidelines

There you wile find the rules which read:

"

Signature Guidelines

1) Keep Nudity to a minimum (sure, there's nothing wrong with it but some people go to extremes)
2) No Images/Banners advertising allowed (web sites/products/etc.) - one line of text with a link is allowed. If it is a site that caters to electronica listeners then it MUST have a link to TranceAddict in it's links area.
3) If you include a list of items or a lot of text in your signature then consider changing the font size to Small from the drop down box above the editor.
4) Keep animated GIFs to a minimum
5) No Political/religion related commentary/imagery
6) Thanks for reading the above - now go be creative with your sig.

Image Restrictions

Max Size: 50,000 bytes (Cumulative TOTAL for ALL images in sig)
Max Height: 150 (Cumulative Total for ALL images in sig)
Max Width: 500 (Cumulative Total for ALL images in sig)"



Please join the "Free Mustard Alliance" and put a stop to Swamper taking away our beloved sigs!


Posted by TheNobleEu on Aug-11-2005 17:41:

quote:
Originally posted by Yoepus
Anyway, join the club.


I will (see below).



quote:
Originally posted by Yoepus
Please join the "Free Mustard Alliance" and put a stop to Swamper taking away our beloved sigs!


Whoa there ketchup-tzar, I very highly doubt this has anything to do with Swamper.

Cheers,
-N


Posted by shaolin_Z on Aug-11-2005 17:47:




Posted by Yoepus on Aug-11-2005 17:55:

quote:
Originally posted by TheNobleEu
Whoa there ketchup-tzar, I very highly doubt this has anything to do with Swamper.


Well Swamper claimed responsibility for not liking mustard. So its just a hunch. It might very well be his wicked side kick, wicked-neo or his rasta wielding, religious-sig-tauting assistant Lira.

I like the signature (welcome to the alliance!), however if you want to avoid it from being baned I would suggest you add some slight nudity, which is clearly allowed.


Posted by occrider on Aug-11-2005 21:16:

quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z




Sarcasm ... check
Mockery ... check
Humor ... check

I like!


Posted by Arbiter on Aug-11-2005 22:17:

Apparently the boards are largely populated with little children who need to be shielded from anything that they might find disagreeable in the sacrosanct realms of politics and religion.

It's a shame, but what can one do?


Posted by Yoepus on Aug-11-2005 23:47:

quote:
Originally posted by Arbiter
It's a shame, but what can one do?


Ban a mod?

That's what I say!


Posted by Goashem on Aug-12-2005 01:07:

quote:
Originally posted by St_Andrew
ask yoepus, he might know....

hey mind if i steal your sig and use it on these forums?


Posted by George Smiley on Aug-12-2005 01:14:

Actually, while were on about banning political sigs (presumably cos they cause offense) I would like to propose the following flags are also banned for causing me offence...

France

That shall be all


Posted by St_Andrew on Aug-12-2005 01:14:

quote:
Originally posted by Goashem
hey mind if i steal your sig and use it on these forums?


Haha no, of course not!


Posted by Goashem on Aug-12-2005 01:22:

quote:
Originally posted by St_Andrew
Haha no, of course not!

uh....uhh....


Posted by St_Andrew on Aug-12-2005 01:25:

quote:
Originally posted by Goashem
uh....uhh....


Nice sig man

I might change it slightly tho make it a bit more appealing, but nothing majorly


Posted by BadBadNeil on Aug-12-2005 01:58:

Just noticed mine got edited too. Good idea Goashem I might "borrow your idea"

I wonder who was complaining...


Posted by shaolin_Z on Aug-12-2005 02:03:

quote:
Originally posted by BadBadNeil
Just noticed mine got edited too. Good idea Goashem I might "borrow your idea"

I wonder who was complaining...


People scared of discussing politics/religion. No, not just scared of discussing, but even having the slightest exposure to it.


Posted by Yoepus on Aug-12-2005 02:05:

quote:
Originally posted by BadBadNeil
Just noticed mine got edited too. Good idea Goashem I might "borrow your idea"

I wonder who was complaining...


Well goddamnit justice be served! Your signature was the most offensive of them all, religious and political! how unbearable





Posted by shaolin_Z on Aug-12-2005 02:09:

Quick question about the "alliance" sigs/avatars. Did this all start with the Markus Schulz alliance or something? What's the history behind it? Please enlighten me.


Posted by BadBadNeil on Aug-12-2005 02:13:

Will just have to use my backup sig until I think of something creative.


Posted by Yoepus on Aug-12-2005 02:19:

quote:
Originally posted by St_Andrew
Nice sig man

I might change it slightly tho make it a bit more appealing, but nothing majorly


I disagree with your sig. I believe it is too politica and does not have enough mustard in it. Please fix it or I will ask a mod to ban you (and may I add, nanny-nanny-poo-poo)

Damn insurgent rebels, the empire will never fall. Ketchup for all!


Posted by shaolin_Z on Aug-12-2005 02:23:

Neil, your new sig is too tripy and is really missing with my head.


Posted by trancaholic on Aug-12-2005 02:30:

It's really missing? And with your head??? Wow, that's got to be the coolest signature ever.


Posted by BadBadNeil on Aug-12-2005 02:31:

quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
Neil, your new sig is too tripy and is really missing with my head.


I hope I don't break the trippy rule

If you think this small one is trippy, you should see the full size one!


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.