Political Sigs: Yea or Nay - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Political Sigs: Yea or Nay

Posted by ogvh5150 on Aug-16-2005 03:13:

Political Sigs: Yea or Nay

Simple Yes or No to political sigs.

I cannot guarantee that there will be a change in policy. But hopefully enough people vote to make some change.

This poll is not endorsed by any mods, admins or owners of the forums and/or tranceaddict dot com. It does not pretend to speak for anyone here other than those that vote.

It is a step. Will you take it?

Posted by Arbiter on Aug-16-2005 03:39:

There is no good reason to restrict them.

Posted by squirrelly on Aug-16-2005 04:16:

So far it's 100% to "yes" but I highly doubt that'll make one ounce of a difference. I can see the negative side to a political signature if it were offensive, but I have yet to see anyone actually offended by any of the political signatures that happen to frequent this subforum.

Posted by ogvh5150 on Aug-16-2005 04:22:

I once had something to say about zionist mustard but now

IDGAF

Posted by squirrelly on Aug-16-2005 04:51:

quote:
Originally posted by ogvh5150
I once had something to say about zionist mustard but now

IDGAF

You don't give a fuck but you made this thread anyway?

Posted by ogvh5150 on Aug-16-2005 04:59:

I guess the use of the word "once" escapes you.

Let me make it more simple to understand:

I once had something to say against zionist mustard but now

IDGAF

You can lead a horse to water......

Posted by Lira on Aug-16-2005 05:38:

quote:
Originally posted by squirrelly
So far it's 100% to "yes" but I highly doubt that'll make one ounce of a difference.

I'm afraid you're right, It won't. It's not up to us, really. There's not much of a choice actually, and I do understand your frustration, and I'm sorry. But please, let's not have more threads about sigs than the one(s) we already have.

Thank you very much,
- Lira