I approve/disapprove the Way Pres. Bush is Handling Iraq

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- I approve/disapprove the Way Pres. Bush is Handling Iraq

Posted by ogvh5150 on Aug-19-2005 20:08:

I approve/disapprove the Way Pres. Bush is Handling Iraq

Approve or Disapprove

That is the question.

Other related polls:

Is the war in Iraq worth your life if you joined the military?
Troops Should be Brought Home...
I approve/disapprove the Way Pres. Bush is Handling Iraq
Can the United States establish a stable, democratic government in Iraq?
Did the Bush administration deliberately mislead the public of Saddams WMD'S?
Can the United States win the war in Iraq?
United States in Iraq Poll: Leave or stay
Don't be a lurker. Vote, it does mean something here.

Posted by Renegade on Aug-19-2005 20:19:

By "handling Iraq" you're referring to the way he buries his head in the sand and pretends that everything over there is going well?

Disapprove, obviously.

Posted by occrider on Aug-19-2005 20:36:

I approve of Commander Cuckoo-Bananas and am anxiously awaiting future military ventures.

Posted by Renegade on Aug-19-2005 20:43:

quote:
Originally posted by occrider
I approve of Commander Cuckoo-Bananas and am anxiously awaiting future military ventures.

Your thoughts are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

Posted by George Smiley on Aug-20-2005 01:42:

So much support for Bush!!

Anyway, I would like to say that summat my lecturer remarked on on the subject...

Soldiers should be trained for the obvious offensive stuuf, + be trained as a police force (like many European police forces, they have the local police, then the "carbonari" etc who are a paramilitary police force, trained in the military plus police) America seemed to be only concerned with toppling Saddam, and lets face it, that wasn't exactly hard when you're America. However, America ignored what would happen after, and that is where our problems started. We did nothing to stop the looting, we never fixed the water etc etc etc. All the talk of "winning hearts and minds" and we did sod all bout it. To anyone with half a brain winning hearts and minds isnt too dificult, but the American military dont seem to understand the concept...

Posted by kush paintings on Aug-20-2005 04:24:

George, is it you or occ that is writing the neocon paper? Either way I would love to see it when it is finished, perhaps a PDD posting?

Posted by St_Andrew on Aug-20-2005 21:28:

Disapprove 14 100.00%
Approve 0 0%

Obviously he has done it very tactless.

Posted by josh4 on Aug-20-2005 22:31:

oh yah the outcome of this poll was a mystery

Posted by metalgearsolid on Aug-20-2005 22:35:

quote:
Originally posted by josh4
oh yah the outcome of this poll was a mystery

looks like you approved so did I

Posted by ogvh5150 on Dec-19-2005 23:47:

vote

Posted by ogvh5150 on Aug-03-2006 22:10:

Posted by sasslife on Aug-06-2006 16:29:

They should never have been there in the first place..

The yanks lost 2500 men/women in the hijacks..

Since then they have lost more than that losing a war against someone who had nothing to do with the events on that day.

But now that they are there their doing the best job they can!!

Posted by jdat on Aug-06-2006 17:17:

quote:
Originally posted by Renegade
By "handling Iraq" you're referring to the way he buries his head in the sand and pretends that everything over there is going well?

Disapprove, obviously.

Same feeling here.

However flawed the concept was; perhaps toppling Hussein was a good idea but as seen in too many overseas conflicts involving the United States there tends to be no long term plan and lacking oversight.