TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- USA - Florida
-- What are you listening to? (Part 3)


Posted by Boomer187 on Sep-11-2005 17:11:

What are you listening to? (Part 3)

original thread here:

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...threadid=209627


2nd thread here

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...threadid=291226



my thread here.



DJ Rooster & Sammy Peralta - Shake It (Chris Kaeser Mix)


Posted by DarkAngel on Sep-11-2005 18:03:

Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooomer





U2 - Vertigo (Marcel Woods bootleg mix!)

This is a rockin' ass tune!


Posted by Zewad on Sep-11-2005 18:16:

DA whats this business in your sig of beign teh last FLTA trance purist??

damon?? me?? melly?? liz??

i could name a few more of us trance heads still...


Posted by DarkAngel on Sep-11-2005 18:46:

quote:
Originally posted by Zewad
DA whats this business in your sig of beign teh last FLTA trance purist??

damon?? me?? melly?? liz??

i could name a few more of us trance heads still...



Damon listens to that Sander person, whoever he is. You, yeah, you're right about that...Melly listens to house too so...and Lis also listens to teh Sander whoever....

I guess it's just me and you, Brent.


Posted by Coup on Sep-11-2005 19:47:

we're not having 3 threads. i'll see which ones die of a natural death, but if theyre all one page one in 48hrs time, i'll put names into a hat


Posted by Boomer187 on Sep-11-2005 21:33:

quote:
Originally posted by Coup
we're not having 3 threads. i'll see which ones die of a natural death, but if theyre all one page one in 48hrs time, i'll put names into a hat



this was just created to point out how useless the #2 thread was. My subtle point being, how is it easier to keep up with a thread if the same amount o people are posting in it? doesn't matter if the thread has 2000 replies or 2, ur outta luck eitherway.



my vote, keep #1, lock and ban this one


Posted by Coup on Sep-11-2005 21:39:

quote:
Originally posted by Boomer187
my vote, keep #1, lock and ban this one

ban the person who made this one?


Posted by DJ Indus Creed on Sep-11-2005 21:50:

Arrow It actually proved how fickle-minded people are

"this was just created to point out how useless the #2 thread was"

Unfortunately no. This, and the response of the first respondent in the #2 thread only shows how fickle minded some people are, and their inherent insecurities.

The personality traits are revealing. One is concerned as to how come "a new member tries to take command" by starting a sequel to perhaps the most popular thread. In his opinion, it was okay to do so if it happened through someone more senior.

The other just dons that "seniority" garb and starts a parallel thread. Now he tries to put a spin to it in form of teh above statement. It doesn't prove anything about thread #2. It just proves that the potential nuisance value of insecure people should not be ignored.

As it is, i have no interest in maintaining or sustaining that 2nd thread nor does it matter to me as to who starts it, or if a sequel is even started. I have had enough.

Coup, please close it (the thread 2).

I had started it because i went to post some of my recent acquires/choices in it and did feel that the thread was long drawn. However while doing so, i hadn't taken into account the pricky sensibilities of a few members. As it is, i am learning.

Peace out.


Posted by Boomer187 on Sep-11-2005 22:06:

Re: It actually proved how fickle-minded people are

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Indus Creed
"this was just created to point out how useless the #2 thread was"

Unfortunately no. This, and the response of the first respondent in the #2 thread only shows how fickle minded some people are, and their inherent insecurities.

The personality traits are revealing. One is concerned as to how come "a new member tries to take command" by starting a sequel to perhaps the most popular thread. In his opinion, it was okay to do so if it happened through someone more senior.

The other just dons that "seniority" garb and starts a parallel thread. Now he tries to put a spin to it in form of teh above statement. It doesn't prove anything about thread #2. It just proves that the potential nuisance value of insecure people should not be ignored.

As it is, i have no interest in maintaining or sustaining that 2nd thread nor does it matter to me as to who starts it, or if a sequel is even started. I have had enough.

Coup, please close it (the thread 2).

I had started it because i went to post some of my recent acquires/choices in it and did feel that the thread was long drawn. However while doing so, i hadn't taken into account the pricky sensibilities of a few members. As it is, i am learning.

Peace out.



Dearest Dr. Freud,

i believe you are reading too deep into these postings. I love your enthusiasm and hope it is better placed in the future. There is no need to try to make passive aggressive shots at those who disagree, it really doesn't get us anywhere.


so hell, if you have a good reason for starting a new thread, if it will clear up the old thread....do it. but I am starting to think you just thought your fav tracks deserved a thread of their own. Well, i am sure to some they do, but they will get equal attention in the first threa.d



and yes coup, ban the creator of the 3rd one he is a turd.


Posted by Zewad on Sep-11-2005 22:06:

whoa.. dude we got frickin shakespeare on our hands..

this is TA.... everything is more or less done in a jokingly manner.... i pulled him in to mess with you as well... point teh finger at me...

spend a few days in the c0r and you'll know where im coming from and how a lot of us think....(i.e. ******* )

i wasnt trying to take a shot at you by anymeans...

Welcome to TA... try the tuna melt..

i lived in Tampa for 20+ years myself... (btw. im only 25)


Posted by Coup on Sep-11-2005 22:10:

this part 2 and 3 is uber pathetic. ive had more than enough shit tonight.



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.