Function vs. Form - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Function vs. Form
Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Posted by tribu on Sep-12-2005 04:30:

Function vs. Form

Has Western society shown us that a combination of both is best?

Common logic says that "function over form" (aka its useability over it's apperance, aka if it is functional, use it) is a saying of the wise. If an object can be used, its apperance should not matter. But isn't function over form just as radical as form over funtcion?

Ia combination of the two best? Who minds a little style?

Posted by igottaknow on Sep-12-2005 04:33:

Eva Longoria

end of thread noob

Posted by tribu on Sep-12-2005 04:35:

Shouldn't I know this by now?

Posted by Floorfiller on Sep-12-2005 04:37:

i think aesthetics are important...

Posted by UWM on Sep-12-2005 04:39:

Re: Function vs. Form

quote:
Originally posted by tribu
Has Western society shown us that a combination of both is best?

Common logic says that "function over form" (aka its useability over it's apperance, aka if it is functional, use it) is a saying of the wise. If an object can be used, its apperance should not matter. But isn't function over form just as radical as form over funtcion?

Ia combination of the two best? Who minds a little style?

So would you argue that getting a 'good' BJ from some 350lb whale is better than getting an 'acceptable' BJ from some 115lb stunner?

Posted by igottaknow on Sep-12-2005 04:41:

Re: Re: Function vs. Form

quote:
Originally posted by UWM
So would you argue that getting a 'good' BJ from some 350lb whale is better than getting an 'acceptable' BJ from some 115lb stunner?

is said whale male or female?

Posted by UWM on Sep-12-2005 04:42:

Re: Re: Re: Function vs. Form

quote:
Originally posted by igottaknow
is said whale male or female?

Transexual.

Posted by Mebot on Sep-12-2005 04:42:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Function vs. Form

quote:
Originally posted by UWM
Transexual.

psy-t would definitely hit it

Posted by UWM on Sep-12-2005 04:44:

Someone needs to make a "Psy-T Approved" graphic.

Maybe I'll do it.

Or a play on the Kix slogan.

Kid tested, Psy-T approved.

Posted by igottaknow on Sep-12-2005 04:46:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Function vs. Form

quote:
Originally posted by UWM
Transexual.

Posted by Mebot on Sep-12-2005 04:47:

quote:
Originally posted by UWM
Someone needs to make a "Psy-T Approved" graphic.

Maybe I'll do it.

Or a play on the Kix slogan.

Kid tested, Psy-T approved.

haha i like it!

Posted by Floorfiller on Sep-12-2005 04:49:

quote:
Originally posted by UWM
Someone needs to make a "Psy-T Approved" graphic.

Maybe I'll do it.

Or a play on the Kix slogan.

Kid tested, Psy-T approved.

Chix wit Dix?

Posted by UWM on Sep-12-2005 04:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Floorfiller
Chix wit Dix?

hahaha

i remember that t-shirt from a long time ago, parodying the trix logo and ripping on gays. it was pretty crass.

"Silly ******, dix are for chix"

Posted by Floorfiller on Sep-12-2005 04:53:

quote:
Originally posted by UWM
hahaha

i remember that t-shirt from a long time ago, parodying the trix logo and ripping on gays. it was pretty crass.

"Silly ******, dix are for chix"

Posted by Allied Nations on Sep-12-2005 04:54:

wow, and this could have been a good thread..

Posted by UWM on Sep-12-2005 04:56:

quote:
Originally posted by dinoXpress
wow, and this could have been a good thread..

Did you expect any less from the COR?

Posted by Allied Nations on Sep-12-2005 04:57:

quote:
Originally posted by UWM
Did you expect any less from the COR?

no, and i am by no means innocent!

just saying it had potential...

Posted by Xenocreator_PG_ on Sep-12-2005 05:01:

I wrote a thesis about an ape that had a bone. The the ape used the bone to scratched its arse.

I ended up deleting it as it would have been to complicated for most core people to understand.

But i will say; that the ape did live happily ever after, even though the bone was broken & left splinters.

Posted by tribu on Sep-12-2005 05:07:

Re: Re: Function vs. Form

quote:
Originally posted by UWM
So would you argue that getting a 'good' BJ from some 350lb whale is better than getting an 'acceptable' BJ from some 115lb stunner?

no way man, your good bj is function, but the form is ugly. Now, a good bj from a 600 pound woman, thats what Im talking about.

Seriously though, an acceptable bj from a a stunner is (often) more rated than a good bj from a beast.

Posted by Floorfiller on Sep-12-2005 05:11:

Re: Re: Re: Function vs. Form

quote:
Originally posted by tribu
no way man, your good bj is function, but the form is ugly. Now, a good bj from a 600 pound woman, thats what Im talking about.

Seriously though, an acceptable bj from a a stunner is (often) more rated than a good bj from a beast.

but there is importance to form. if what you are saying is true, then a bj from a dude as long as it's good would work, however the form creates a displeaure so that somehow detracts from the bj...

Posted by tribu on Sep-12-2005 05:14:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Function vs. Form

quote:
Originally posted by Floorfiller
but there is importance to form. if what you are saying is true, then a bj from a dude as long as it's good would work, however the form creates a displeaure so that somehow detracts from the bj...

I'm saying a combination of both is the best. Would you rather have hyper-form, hyper-function, or average both? Hyper-Function is a bj from a dude, Hyper-Form is a chick who doesnt even put your cock in her mouth. I think most outliers are excluded.

But in reality, I was creating an easily hijackable thread for the Cor faithful

Posted by Floorfiller on Sep-12-2005 05:17:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Function vs. Form

quote:
Originally posted by tribu
I'm saying a combination of both is the best. Would you rather have hyper-form, hyper-function, or average both. Hyper-Function is a bj from a dude, Hyper-Form is a chick who doesnt even put your cock in her mouth. I think most outliers are excluded.

But in reality, I was creating an easily hijackable thread for the Cor faithful

hmmmm...well personally i'd have to choose average both. if the ultimate goal of function and form is pleasure (atleast in our example of bj), then i think in order to maximize pleasure you'd need the balance...

Posted by Xenocreator_PG_ on Sep-12-2005 05:18:

yes a dildo can be used as a hammer & vise versa.

One can use a gold fish as a tennis ball, though it is not practical to use a whale. Unless it is a baby whale, then tennis may be able to continue. Unless all the whales have been fished to extinction, then unfortunately no one will be able to play tennis.

Posted by Allied Nations on Sep-12-2005 05:20:

quote:
Originally posted by Xenocreator_PG_
yes a dildo can be used as a hammer & vise versa.

One can use a gold fish as a tennis ball, though it is not practical to use a whale. Unless it is a baby whale, then tennis may be able to continue. Unless all the whales have been fished to extinction, then unfortunately no one will be able to play tennis.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAhahahahahhahahahhhahaa!!!!!

Posted by tribu on Sep-12-2005 05:23:

If you can substitute a whale for a tennis ball, why can't you substitute, say, an armadillo for a baby whale? Their hard shell would prevent their damage from the repeated blows, and their hilarious apperance could add a light heartedness to tennis observers that a baby whale might not be able to achieve.

Pages (2): [1] 2 »