TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Compare and Contrast...


Posted by Fir3start3r on Sep-22-2005 00:44:

Exclamation Compare and Contrast...

Lets take note...

Houston Evacuation


New Orleans Evacuation


Now where do you suppose Houston found all those bus drivers?

I'm going to go out on a limb and guess they're not from FEMA...


Posted by Sunsnail on Sep-22-2005 01:45:

To be honest, if Hurricane Katrina landed in Texas first then I'm sure the evacuation would closely resemble what had happened in New Orleans. If Hurricane Rita then went to New Orleans, I'm sure they would evacuate with much more efficiency.


Posted by Fir3start3r on Sep-22-2005 04:53:

quote:
Originally posted by Sunsnail
To be honest, if Hurricane Katrina landed in Texas first then I'm sure the evacuation would closely resemble what had happened in New Orleans. If Hurricane Rita then went to New Orleans, I'm sure they would evacuate with much more efficiency.




That's like sayin'...

"Well, we pointed the gun at his ass and he didn't believe us, now when we point, he moves..."

Should I just label this as... "obvious"??


Posted by St_Andrew on Sep-22-2005 11:35:

quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r


That's like sayin'...

"Well, we pointed the gun at his ass and he didn't believe us, now when we point, he moves..."

Should I just label this as... "obvious"??


Even if it's obvious, it's sad that it takes a catastrophy to make a change...


Posted by Fir3start3r on Sep-22-2005 12:50:

quote:
Originally posted by St_Andrew
Even if it's obvious, it's sad that it takes a catastrophy to make a change...


Sad and true...


Posted by Renegade on Sep-22-2005 13:50:

Re: Compare and Contrast...

quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
Lets take note...

Houston Evacuation


New Orleans Evacuation


If you're suggesting that the only (or main) reason New Orleans wasn't evacuated properly was because they acted too slowly and allowed their buses to get flooded in a depot somewhere, then keep in mind that even if all those school buses were used then it wouldn't have made a great deal of difference:

quote:
As of 2003, the most recent year for which data appears to be available, the Orleans Parish school district, which operates New Orleans' public schools, owned only 324 school buses.

[...]

According to a September 5, 2003, article in the New Orleans Times-Picayune, "The [Orleans Parish school] district owns 324 buses but 70 are broken down."

[...]

While estimates of the number of residents stranded in New Orleans following the storm vary, New Orleans officials have suggested that 80 percent of the city's residents evacuated before the hurricane hit. That leaves roughly 97,000 residents who remained in New Orleans.

New Orleans' combined fleet of public transit and school buses would not have had nearly enough capacity to evacuate all of those who remained in the city. A July 8 Times-Picayune article, titled "RTA buses would be used for evacuation; But plan still falls far short of needs," pointed out that the RTA owned 364 public buses. "Even if the entire fleet was used," the Times-Picayune noted, "the buses would carry only about 22,000 people out of the city -- far short of the 134,000 people estimated to be without cars in a recent University of New Orleans study." Even the addition of the full school bus fleet would have been far from sufficient to transport the remaining residents.


http://mediamatters.org/items/200509120005

Besides, where would one go about finding 300 bus-drivers at just a few hours notice? Or is that what you were getting at in the first place?


Posted by Shakka on Sep-22-2005 17:19:

Re: Re: Compare and Contrast...

quote:
Originally posted by Renegade
If you're suggesting that the only (or main) reason New Orleans wasn't evacuated properly was because they acted too slowly and allowed their buses to get flooded in a depot somewhere, then keep in mind that even if all those school buses were used then it wouldn't have made a great deal of difference:



http://mediamatters.org/items/200509120005

Besides, where would one go about finding 300 bus-drivers at just a few hours notice? Or is that what you were getting at in the first place?


So there's no reason to believe that hundreds of buses that were left in a gravel pit could've been put to any use at all?

That site doesn't say anything other than opinionated spin about Fox News, so I'm suspect on your claim that it wouldn't have made any difference. Even if it was only 364 buses--stick 40 people on each bus and you're talking about 14,000+ people. Certainly not everyone, but certainly not a small number either.

And as far as getting bus drivers on demand--fuck that. Worst case scenario, if I'm stuck in the Superdome or somewhere else, just give me the fucking keys and I'll drive us all the fuck out of Dodge.


Posted by Sunsnail on Sep-22-2005 17:28:

quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r


That's like sayin'...

"Well, we pointed the gun at his ass and he didn't believe us, now when we point, he moves..."

Should I just label this as... "obvious"??


You'd be surprised how many people around me don't seem to realize that. They think it's because Texas is whiter and therefore smarter than the people in New Orleans


Posted by Fir3start3r on Sep-22-2005 17:39:

quote:
Originally posted by Sunsnail
You'd be surprised how many people around me don't seem to realize that. They think it's because Texas is whiter and therefore smarter than the people in New Orleans


Oh I'm sure that card will come out soon enough...


Posted by Fir3start3r on Sep-22-2005 17:53:

Re: Re: Compare and Contrast...

quote:
Originally posted by Renegade
Besides, where would one go about finding 300 bus-drivers at just a few hours notice? Or is that what you were getting at in the first place?


That exuse of not being able to 'find bus drivers in time' is so full of shite...
They were well aware of their prediciment even before that storm was a gleam in Mother Nature's eye.
The fact that they had DAYS notice that it was heading in their direction should have tipped them off...government beaucracy aside.
They had a documented plan for such an event!
They probably should have let FEMA know properly what the hell they needed instead of throwing their hands in the air at the last sec.


Posted by St_Andrew on Sep-22-2005 17:57:

Re: Re: Re: Compare and Contrast...

quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
They had a documented plan for such an event!


Ehm you honestly think they did?!

To me it seems nuts if you don't have a number of bus drivers ready for an event like this. Shouldn't be that hard to find really. Aweful excuse, come up with something better renegade aka the Nagin apologist


Posted by Trancer-X on Sep-22-2005 18:07:

I don't think that you're looking at the entire picture. Aside from the lack of preparedness, there are many aspects of the Katrina disaster which are being overlooked.

http://prisonplanet.com/Pages/Sept05/090905levees.htm

http://www.azcentral.com/news/artic...ina-flee10.html

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?...3&articleId=941

http://www.washtimes.com/upi/20050908-112433-4907r.htm



Posted by BadBadNeil on Sep-22-2005 18:25:

The mayor of Galveston admitted on tv the other day that normally in a hurricane like this they would have waited for a day or two before to issue evacuations but in light of Katrina they started a week in advance and used busses to evacuate the people along with getting everything needed from FEMA. Hell even in Key West and when the other hurricane hit North Carolina everyone was super quick to react. It's invevitable that there will be a few idiots at least that stick around regardless and then when they need to be recued blame the government.

Hopefully this will be a continuing trend and they won't get lazy again in a few years.


Posted by LiquidX on Sep-22-2005 20:00:

Its very unfair to compare and contrast, when everyone in this Nation learned from a Lesson that Katrina left. So no one can conclude if Texas would have done better eitherway. Its BS.


Posted by Shakka on Sep-22-2005 20:05:

quote:
Originally posted by LiquidX
Its very unfair to compare and contrast, when everyone in this Nation learned from a Lesson that Katrina left. So no one can conclude if Texas would have done better eitherway. Its BS.


It's not like Katrina was the first major hurricane to hit a major coastal U.S. city. People have known how to evacuate for decades, if not centuries.

Now, there may be more focus on not making some of the stupid mistakes that happened with Katrina (i.e. the buses, mixed signals, etc).


Posted by LiquidX on Sep-22-2005 20:36:

quote:
Originally posted by Shakka
It's not like Katrina was the first major hurricane to hit a major coastal U.S. city. People have known how to evacuate for decades, if not centuries.

Now, there may be more focus on not making some of the stupid mistakes that happened with Katrina (i.e. the buses, mixed signals, etc).


True, but I never said to what you are referring to. The point of the thread was Texas is acting up in a smarter way then N.O. acted prior to Katrina, thats what my response was referring to. Now.. even here in Florida the response to Rita changed after what Katrina did in N.O. No one is taking chances, so its very unfair to say what the started of this thread is trying to make..


Posted by Shakka on Sep-22-2005 20:58:

You Floridans are seasoned veterans!


Posted by Renegade on Sep-22-2005 21:02:

Re: Re: Re: Compare and Contrast...

quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
That exuse of not being able to 'find bus drivers in time' is so full of shite...


I'm not trying to make an "exuse" for anybody. There were failures, across all levels in government, in preparing for this hurricane and the fact that 200-odd buses were left at a depot when they could have been used to evacuate people is indeed damning on whoever it was charged with the responsibility to get the people out of there.

However, the point I raised is still, I think, a valid one: where are you going to find 200 bus-drivers on a few hours notice and how are you going to co-ordinate them to pick up those left behind and then leave the city for a safe location in such a small space of time? Again, I'm not making excuses and I'm not asking the question with an alterior motive in mind: you're the Mayor of NO, what steps are you going to go through, in a very limited time-frame, to ensure those buses are utilised?

quote:
They were well aware of their prediciment even before that storm was a gleam in Mother Nature's eye.


Um, according to the factcheck.org link you posted a couple of days ago, they weren't. They knew they were in some danger several days before hand, but the immediacy of the situation really didn't hit them until it was too late. The storm was upgraded from a category 3 storm to a category 5 storm within the space of 15 hours. They didn't, based on the advice of the experts, realise that the levees were going to be breached until after the evacuation was already called. Like I said, you're the Mayor of NO: are you going to call a costly, mandatory evacuation of city the during the advance of a category 3 storm that, according to the best estimates they then had, shouldn't be any danger of breaching the levees they already in place there?

Hindsight is 20/20 my friend. If the mayor of NO had evacuated the city for nothing, he would have been crucified. If the mayor of Galveston hadn't evacuated the city - regardless of what happens next - he would have been crucified. That, I think, is the reality of the circumstances.

quote:
The fact that they had DAYS notice that it was heading in their direction should have tipped them off...government beaucracy aside.


If cities were evacuated every time hurricanes were in danger of hitting the Gulf Coast, when would they ever be occupied?

quote:
They had a documented plan for such an event!


Which "they" had very little time to put into action. Again, that doesn't excuse the fact that provisions weren't made to mobilise the buses in order to evacuate people from the city, but it does explain - to a degree at least - why the evacuation was orchestrated so poorly.

quote:
They probably should have let FEMA know properly what the hell they needed instead of throwing their hands in the air at the last sec.


What? FEMA were running the show for two days before the hurricane hit. Bush declared a state of emergency for the state and FEMA were authorized "to coordinate all disaster relief efforts" during that period. They were in charge, effectively, for long enough to oversee a co-ordinated total evacuation of the city, presuming that the 2x20=40 hours figure for evacuation is accurate.

quote:
Originally posted by St_Andrew
Ehm you honestly think they did?!

To me it seems nuts if you don't have a number of bus drivers ready for an event like this. Shouldn't be that hard to find really.


It was the first time this has ever happened in NO. Do you think they'd just have 200 bus-drivers sitting around wating for that phone-call to reach them?

quote:
Aweful excuse, come up with something better renegade aka the Nagin apologist


I actually had to google "Nagin" then.... smart-arse.

quote:
Originally posted by Shakka
So there's no reason to believe that hundreds of buses that were left in a gravel pit could've been put to any use at all?


Did I say that? What I actually said was:

quote:
even if all those school buses were used then it wouldn't have made a great deal of difference


Now I was being a tad pesimistic there, but even presuming that all those buses were in perfect order (i.e. discounting the 70 that were broken down) and we go by the AP photographer's assessment of 200 buses in that lot and a rate of 22,000 people evactuated per 364 buses, if all those buses were utilised to capacity, the response was perfectly co-ordinated and everyone who stayed was actually intent on leaving, then - given the successful fulfillment of all these variables - they would have been able to evacuate about 10-15% of those who remained. It would have been a more desirable outcome had this actually happened, of course, but would it have significantly - in the grand scheme of things - lessened the scale of the tragedy that befell the town? Not especially. We just would have found some other variable to point the finger at and blame on behalf of the 85-90% of those left behind.

quote:
That site doesn't say anything other than opinionated spin about Fox News


Gee, a media watchdog having a go at Fox News? What is the world coming to...

quote:
so I'm suspect on your claim that it wouldn't have made any difference.


Please, you needn't take my word for it. You're welcome to peruse the couple of dozen articles cited on that page and form your own opinion.

quote:
Even if it was only 364 buses--stick 40 people on each bus and you're talking about 14,000+ people. Certainly not everyone, but certainly not a small number either.


I agree completely. I'm not saying that the perfect utilisation of the buses wouldn't have made any difference, just that - in the context of the entire situation - there are bigger things to worry about (the response, for instance, seems to have been far more poorly co-ordinated than the evacuation). All I'm trying to argue against here is the notion that there was a simple, clear-cut way to have avoided this tragedy. The fact is, this simply isn't the case.

quote:
And as far as getting bus drivers on demand--fuck that. Worst case scenario, if I'm stuck in the Superdome or somewhere else, just give me the fucking keys and I'll drive us all the fuck out of Dodge.


And I'm sure I speak for all of the citizens of New Orleans when I say, "No thanks, I'd rather take my chances in the Superdome"...


Posted by St_Andrew on Sep-22-2005 21:19:

quote:
Originally posted by Renegade
It was the first time this has ever happened in NO. Do you think they'd just have 200 bus-drivers sitting around wating for that phone-call to reach them?


Well if it works anything like it did in Canada, every bus has its driver. So it would just be to make an announcement "all drivers must come and do this bla bla".

Of course there would be plenty that didn't show up cause they wants to save their own ass, not someone elses. But I mean really, Galverstone and Houston managed to get a shit load of buses going on short notice, why could they find drivers but not Nagin? I guess ppl would be more helpful after what happend in NO, but I still think it would have been better if the mayor actually tried to get drivers to those buses than not to try at all.

I'm not saying it's his fault (so no offence to your hero there ), but there certainly was a huge lack in planning when it was a well known fact that NO had a huge population that couldnt manage to get out of there themselves. With some planning it should have been pretty easy to organize those buses imo, even without planning it should have been manageable, but I guess if you don't have any proper planning you have a lot of other things to think about when something like that happens...


Posted by Fir3start3r on Sep-22-2005 21:28:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Compare and Contrast...

quote:
Originally posted by Renegade
I'm not trying to make an "exuse" for anybody. There were failures, across all levels in government, in preparing for this hurricane and the fact that 200-odd buses were left at a depot when they could have been used to evacuate people is indeed damning on whoever it was charged with the responsibility to get the people out of there.

I'm not necessarily pointing you out Renegade but yes, that pic over is pretty incriminating.

quote:

However, the point I raised is still, I think, a valid one: where are you going to find 200 bus-drivers on a few hours notice and how are you going to co-ordinate them to pick up those left behind and then leave the city for a safe location in such a small space of time? Again, I'm not making excuses and I'm not asking the question with an alterior motive in mind: you're the Mayor of NO, what steps are you going to go through, in a very limited time-frame, to ensure those buses are utilised?

And here in lies the big question.
Why is it that Houston (and surrounding area) is so proactive then?
Would they have done the same had Katrina not happened?

quote:

Hindsight is 20/20 my friend. If the mayor of NO had evacuated the city for nothing, he would have been crucified. If the mayor of Galveston hadn't evacuated the city - regardless of what happens next - he would have been crucified. That, I think, is the reality of the circumstances.

If cities were evacuated every time hurricanes were in danger of hitting the Gulf Coast, when would they ever be occupied?

Which "they" had very little time to put into action. Again, that doesn't excuse the fact that provisions weren't made to mobilise the buses in order to evacuate people from the city, but it does explain - to a degree at least - why the evacuation was orchestrated so poorly.


There's a problem here.
New Orleans isn't like any other city along the coast.
They're a cereal bowl below sea level.
The administrative gods should have had this well planned waaaay before now in anticipation of such an event.
You can only go bet against the odds so many times.
Maybe they were hoping it would never happen during thier watch?
We may never know (but hopefully will).

quote:

What? FEMA were running the show for two days before the hurricane hit. Bush declared a state of emergency for the state and FEMA were authorized "to coordinate all disaster relief efforts" during that period. They were in charge, effectively, for long enough to oversee a co-ordinated total evacuation of the city, presuming that the 2x20=40 hours figure for evacuation is accurate.

It was the first time this has ever happened in NO. Do you think they'd just have 200 bus-drivers sitting around wating for that phone-call to reach them?


FEMA wasn't running anything; the State governor wouldn't let them. FEMA doesn't have juristication over anything without State approval.


Posted by Trancer-X on Sep-23-2005 04:07:

Boom

Soooooooo... why was FEMA cutting communication wires and other such things?


Posted by Fir3start3r on Sep-23-2005 04:40:

quote:
Originally posted by Trancer-X
Boom

Soooooooo... why was FEMA cutting communication wires and other such things?



WHAM

We can all thank the inept Mr.Brown for that...

quote:

FEMA's Brown To Blame
There's plenty of blame going around with what happened in New Orleans. How can reporters and Harry Connick, Jr get into NO when FEMA claims that, with its helicopters and trucks, it can't.

But that's not all there is. Michael Brown, FEMA director, was an idiot horseshow floor manager before getting a FEMA job, a product of cronyism. And, FEMA was chopped up and absorbed by, you guessed it, the DHS.

Hence, FEMA, needing all the help it could get, denied Amtrak's help in evacuation, turned away experienced firefighters, bars morticians from entering NO, and, god forbid, stops Wal-Mart's supply trucks.

This is what happens when the President takes too many vacations.


>>Source<<



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.