TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Scandals don't just happen in Canada
Scandals don't just happen in Canada
| quote: |
Source: Economist; 12/3/2005, Vol. 377 Issue 8455, p32-32, 2/3p, 1c Document Type: Article Subject Terms: *BRIBERY *MISCONDUCT in office *TAX evasion *WHITE collar crimes PLEAS of guilty POLITICAL corruption Geographic Terms: UNITED States People: CUNNINGHAM, Randy -- Trials, litigation, etc. Abstract: The article reports that United States Republican Congressman Randy Cunningham confessed to accepting bribes and to evading taxes. The federal charges and Cunningham's guilty plea detail an astonishing list of bribes and favors accepted from defence contractors in return for helping them to win government business. Thanks to the self-interested generosity of four co-conspirators, much of it funnelled through the congressman's company, Top Gun Enterprises, Cunningham was supplied with a Rolls-Royce, antique furniture, Persian carpets, the use of a yacht as rent-free accommodation in Washington. Bill Frist, the Senate majority leader, is under scrutiny by the Securities and Exchange Commission, for some well-timed stock sales; Tom DeLay, who has stepped down as House majority leader, is facing criminal charges in Texas of campaign-finance abuse; Michael Scanlon, a former spokesman for DeLay, pleaded guilty to bribery; David Safavian, a White House procurement official, has been charged with perjury and obstruction of justice; and Scooter Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, has been indicted for perjury. Full Text Word Count: 678 ISSN: 0013-0613 Accession Number: 19066747 Database: Business Source Corporate * * * Section: United States Congressional scandals Top gun for hire A hero with leaden feet, a Rolls-Royce and Persian carpets Dateline: LOS ANGELES ICARUS may not be an exact parallel, but Randy "Duke" Cunningham, whose exploits as a Navy fighter pilot inspired the Tom Cruise movie "Top Gun", has plunged earthwards with startling speed. On November 28th the eight-term Republican congressman, who represents part of San Diego County, stood in tears outside a federal courtroom, confessed to accepting $2.4m in bribes and to evading more than $1m in taxes, and announced his resignation: "I broke the law, concealed my conduct and disgraced my high office." Indeed so. Mr Cunningham, a rock-solid conservative, sat on the House Appropriations Committee and its defence subcommittee and was chair of the House Intelligence subcommittee on terrorism and human intelligence. The federal charges and Mr Cunningham's 33-page guilty plea detail an astonishing list of bribes and favours accepted from defence contractors in return for helping them to win government business. Thanks to the self-interested generosity of four co-conspirators, much of it funnelled through the congressman's company, Top Gun Enterprises, Mr Cunningham was supplied with a Rolls-Royce, antique furniture, Persian carpets, the use of a yacht (the Duke-Stir) as rent-free accommodation in Washington, even a graduation party for his daughter. One spur for the federal investigation was Mr Cunningham's $1.7m sale of a house in Del Mar two years ago to Mitchell Wade, the founder of MZM Inc, a contractor that specialises in classified intelligence work. Less than a year later, in a booming housing market, Mr Wade sold the house at a loss of $700,000. In the meantime Mr Cunningham, using in part his illicit funds, had bought a house in affluent Rancho Santa Fe for $2.5m. Under the terms of his plea bargain, Mr Cunningham will forfeit his antiques and other possessions along with his financial interest in the Rancho Santa Fe home, and more than $1.8m in cash. He could also, when he returns to the San Diego court for sentencing on February 27th, face up to ten years in prison and a fine of $350,000. Nancy Pelosi, the House Democratic leader, jumped on his mea culpa, calling it "just the latest example of the culture of corruption that pervades the Republican-controlled Congress, which ignores the needs of the American people to serve wealthy special interests and their cronies." In one way, this is partisan claptrap: the last congressman to leave under a similar cloud was a Democrat: James Traficant, who was expelled from the House in 2002 after being convicted of bribery and tax evasion. On the other hand, Republicans, conscious of their Christian evangelical base, tend to preach a sterner morality, which means they are more open to accusations of hypocrisy. And the "ethics cloud" hanging over the Republicans is hardly a figment of Mrs Pelosi's imagination. Bill Frist, the Senate majority leader, is under scrutiny by the Securities and Exchange Commission, for some well-timed stock sales; Tom DeLay, who has "temporarily" stepped down as House majority leader, is facing criminal charges in Texas of campaign-finance abuse; Michael Scanlon, a former spokesman for Mr DeLay, pleaded guilty last week to bribery; David Safavian, a top White House procurement official, has been charged with perjury and obstruction of justice; and Scooter Libby, Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, has been indicted for perjury. Worse may be to come. Mr Cunningham has agreed to co-operate with the authorities in their continuing investigations; so, too, has Mr Scanlon, who was a partner of Jack Abramoff, a supremely well-connected Washington lobbyist indicted earlier this year for wire fraud in a case involving the purchase of a Florida casino boat company. Mr Abramoff's dealings with Indian tribes and Washington politicians are being investigated by both the Justice Department and the Senate Indian Affairs Committee--and prosecutors are said to have their sights on several Republicans. Fortunately for the embattled White House, there are apparently some Democrats in the target zone, too. PHOTO (COLOR): One day Tom Cruise will look like this -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright of The Economist � 2005 is the property of Economist Newspaper Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. All rights reserved. Users may not save or store any or all of the content on their own systems or distribute any of the content on a local area or wide area network (such as corporate intranets or networks). |
Scandals happen everywhere, it's just that in Canada the criminals get away with it.
Also, the magnitude/severity/frequency of Canadian scandals is far larger than anything else in the Western world.
Canada needs accountability and reform.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by ShadoWolf Scandals happen everywhere, it's just that in Canada the criminals get away with it. Also, the magnitude/severity/frequency of Canadian scandals is far larger than anything else in the Western world. Canada needs accountability and reform. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MarkT source? if U.S. defence contracts are involved, I'm suspecting they're far larger than anything going on here. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MarkT source? if U.S. defence contracts are involved, I'm suspecting they're far larger than anything going on here. |
It's interesting, but there doesn't seem to be much info on just how much money was at stake here. I infer perhaps a few million? So fine, he's being fined $350,000 and facing up to 10 years in prison. Here, we have over $20 billion embezzled and the punishment for these people is to go around the country making speeches about "integrity".
If the guilty parties here were actually being punished for their crimes then I wouldn't be complaining. I know that there's corruption everywhere - what's important is that it gets identified and rectified.
He also confessed. The Liberals have denied everything to this date (obviously they can't continue to deny what the Gomery report has already made public, but they certainly haven't expressed any regret over it or any SERIOUS plans to pay the money back).
| quote: |
| Originally posted by MarkT source? if U.S. defence contracts are involved, I'm suspecting they're far larger than anything going on here. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DigiNut If the guilty parties here were actually being punished for their crimes then I wouldn't be complaining. I know that there's corruption everywhere - what's important is that it gets identified and rectified. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by drgoodvibe I do agree, but I don't think the Liberal party itself should be punished. Chretian was involved and a few others in the PO, et all... They should be punished, but obviously not everyone in the Liberal cabinet was involved. Don't punish the many because of the actions of the few. I personally have a beef with our entire parliamentary system. Gives far too much power to the PM when there is a majority government. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by drgoodvibe I do agree, but I don't think the Liberal party itself should be punished. Chretian was involved and a few others in the PO, et all... They should be punished, but obviously not everyone in the Liberal cabinet was involved. Don't punish the many because of the actions of the few. |
| quote: |
| I personally have a beef with our entire parliamentary system. Gives far too much power to the PM when there is a majority government. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DigiNut It's more than a "few", though... they're only even looking at the people who mishandled billions. If they punished everybody who misappropriated or helped to misappropriate smaller amounts (i.e. millions) with the same severity as the guy in the article you posted, over half the LPC would be behind bars. And again I really think it's delusional to allow Martin to stay in power after this - if he's not guilty, then he's incompetent. Pick one. Being finance minister is like being CFO and prime minister CEO - if you're careless enough to allow something like this to happen right under your nose, you're not fit to be in that position. Whether or not you believe me, I'd be saying the same thing if Harper was in charge. This isn't about partisanship, it's about whether or not the current leader (and his underlings) actually have the necessary qualifications and trustworthiness to run a country. If I saw any party or party leader with that kind of track record, I would think that he is unfit to lead, and if it somehow became clear that all the parties were composed of such individuals, I would leave the country. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by drgoodvibe good post, I agree with you mostly. For me, although I see Martin as unfit to lead for pretty much the same reasons as you do. I still believe in the party platform. I believe in our supreme court (gay rights), i'm pro-choice, I don't want privitized health care (two tier), (but also agree that throwing money at it won't solve anything)and so on. However i'm not socialist enough to vote NDP. Im already getting taxed to high heaven -- but anyways here I am caught between a rock and a hard place. I still have to vote for the party that fits my values the best. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by drgoodvibe I believe in our supreme court (gay rights), i'm pro-choice, I don't want privitized health care (two tier), (but also agree that throwing money at it won't solve anything)and so on. However i'm not socialist enough to vote NDP. Im already getting taxed to high heaven -- but anyways here I am caught between a rock and a hard place. I still have to vote for the party that fits my values the best. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.