Are There Any Moral Truths? - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Are There Any Moral Truths?

Posted by St_Andrew on Dec-12-2005 23:42:

Are There Any Moral Truths?

For example, is "It is wrong to kill" a true moral statement or merely a statement of opinion and could as well be stated "I think it is wrong to kill" ?

Might have been asked here before, but I tried to search for something but didn't find any. Anyway, would be interesting to hear some of the ppl on this forum's arguments

Personally I would say there are no moral truths, and I would be really interested in hearing arguments against this

Posted by Trancer-X on Dec-13-2005 00:08:

Re: Are There Any Moral Truths?

quote:
Originally posted by St_Andrew
For example, is "It is wrong to kill" a true moral statement or merely a statement of opinion and could as well be stated "I think it is wrong to kill" ?

Might have been asked here before, but I tried to search for something but didn't find any. Anyway, would be interesting to hear some of the ppl on this forum's arguments

Personally I would say there are no moral truths, and I would be really interested in hearing arguments against this

St. Andrew, the nihilist. Sorry, I just had to interject that.

Posted by donnybrasco on Dec-13-2005 01:24:

I suppose it can be relative, but there are certainly some moral truths that are more common and widely agreed upon than others.

Killing depends on who's being killed and who's doing the killing I'd guess...and why. The Tookie Williams murders were wrong by most standards...and imho, killing him as retribution and as a deterrent to other would-be murders, is perfectly necessary and acceptable by my same standards.

Die soon and die hard, "Tookie"...yah mutha-fucka.

Posted by Renegade on Dec-13-2005 14:45:

If people hold moral values, then they are quantifiable and necessarily "objective". If they have objectivity, then they have a determinable "truth value". If moral values possess truth value, then it is possible to empirically (not rationally!) determine right from wrong.

In short, people create moral values subjectively, propogate and act upon them objectively and enforce them inter-subjectively. So there's 500 years of Western moral theory unified by one single sentence - when do I get my paycheck?

Posted by St_Andrew on Dec-13-2005 23:20:

quote:
Originally posted by Renegade
If people hold moral values, then they are quantifiable and necessarily "objective". If they have objectivity, then they have a determinable "truth value". If moral values possess truth value, then it is possible to empirically (not rationally!) determine right from wrong.

I really don't get this reasononing, please elaborate?

Only thing I can make out of it, is that you are making lots o assumptions...

Posted by Shakka on Dec-13-2005 23:45:

St. Andrew, people far and wide are great at rationalizing just about anything, so in that regard, you'll probably rarely find one if there is one.

So in that regard, if you are willing to qualify the statement a little more and give some context to it, then you might get closer. Unless that happens to be what you're trying to steer away from.

And it doesn't help when people from different walks of life all have different sets of morals. And this is yet another reason I like Ayn Rand so much.