Poll: Iran - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Poll: Iran
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »

Posted by LWMA on Dec-26-2005 00:23:

Poll: Iran

Thoughts? The SOB is an anti-semitic bastard...

Posted by Lepanto on Dec-26-2005 05:43:

well, seeing as how now is only this year for like a week either way is fine

Posted by hardcore trancer on Dec-26-2005 09:29:

Bush first

Posted by Purple on Dec-26-2005 17:31:

Where is the option for 'Make him president of US'?

Posted by Dervish on Dec-26-2005 18:07:

Re: Poll: Iran

quote:
Depose Iran's leader now or next year?

I'm so glad that the American values of democracy and the proliferation of it through out the world are still in the hearts of every American....

Not the biggest fan of Iran but at the point where you erode your own values to beat someone then they win.

Posted by Lepanto on Dec-27-2005 15:30:

quote:
Originally posted by Purple
Where is the option for 'Make him president of US'?

A very likely scenario indeed.

Posted by LWMA on Dec-28-2005 03:05:

quote:
Originally posted by Lepanto
well, seeing as how now is only this year for like a week either way is fine

Hahahhaaaa!!! My point exactly. At least some mf caught the humor.

Posted by ali92 on Dec-28-2005 22:41:

Get rid of him ASAP.

Posted by hardcore trancer on Dec-28-2005 23:10:

Dont know if you guys heard,but the ****** was almost assassinated
about a week ago,his body guards were killed but he survived.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/a...RTICLE_ID=47956

Posted by Pheobius on Dec-29-2005 01:08:

I know it doesn't seem to matter to anyone any more, but the UN still classifies regime change as an illegal act. How can you hold the moral high ground when your breaking international law?

Posted by hardcore trancer on Dec-29-2005 01:25:

quote:
Originally posted by Pheobius
I know it doesn't seem to matter to anyone any more, but the UN still classifies regime change as an illegal act. How can you hold the moral high ground when your breaking international law?

when the U.S breaks a law it is ok,and they can get away with it After all they break international laws for peaceful purposes right?

Posted by Kapedano on Dec-29-2005 04:32:

quote:
Originally posted by hardcore trancer
when the U.S breaks a law it is ok,and they can get away with it After all they break international laws for peaceful purposes right?

yup

Posted by hardcore trancer on Dec-29-2005 04:59:

quote:
Originally posted by gouuryella
yup

In that case other countries should be able to break any laws that they want.

Posted by Kapedano on Dec-29-2005 05:25:

quote:
Originally posted by hardcore trancer
In that case other countries should be able to break any laws that they want.

Yup, and they will pay for it. And you might say..well why dont we punish America? Because all the other countries in the world do not have the power that America has.

Posted by hardcore trancer on Dec-29-2005 09:28:

quote:
Originally posted by gouuryella
Yup, and they will pay for it. And you might say..well why dont we punish America? Because all the other countries in the world do not have the power that America has.

hmmm so being a superpower country enables you to fuck with any country that you wish right?

Posted by Purple on Dec-29-2005 12:17:

Posted by ali92 on Dec-29-2005 14:55:

quote:
Originally posted by Pheobius
I know it doesn't seem to matter to anyone any more, but the UN still classifies regime change as an illegal act. How can you hold the moral high ground when your breaking international law?
Regime change by who? Who would have to be doing the change in order for the law to be broken? What if the people of said country (in this case, Iran) wanted this guy out and would do anything - _including assassination_ - in order to get him, and anyone else similar to him, out?

Posted by Purple on Dec-29-2005 15:09:

quote:
Originally posted by ali92
Regime change by who? Who would have to be doing the change in order for the law to be broken? What if the people of said country (in this case, Iran) wanted this guy out and would do anything - _including assassination_ - in order to get him, and anyone else similar to him, out?

I assume you saying that hypothetically.

Just to get the facts straight, people of Iran dont want him out, they voted him for the post he is currently in.

Posted by ali92 on Dec-29-2005 15:11:

quote:
Originally posted by Purple
I assume you saying that hypothetically.

Just to get the facts straight, people of Iran dont want him out, they voted him for the post he is currently in.
Yes. I was speaking hypothetically. BTW, are you sure that they really voted him in & not like what happened in both of the last two presidential elections (2000 & 2004, especially 2000) in the US?

Posted by Purple on Dec-29-2005 15:18:

quote:
Originally posted by ali92
Yes. I was speaking hypothetically. BTW, are you sure that they really voted him in & not like what happened in both of the last two presidential elections (2000 & 2004, especially 2000) in the US?

No, no it was not like US, Iranians are not as dumb and stupid as Americans.

Also it was not some close call election, he won with big majority.

Posted by Kapedano on Dec-29-2005 17:23:

quote:
Originally posted by hardcore trancer
hmmm so being a superpower country enables you to fuck with any country that you wish right?

Yup, countries like Iraq, Iran..ect ect. You are brainwashed by "This was is about oil, this war is about Bush's interest". So you will never be happy with what is happening. Or your favorite one "Bush is a terrorist".

Posted by Purple on Dec-29-2005 17:27:

quote:
Originally posted by gouuryella
Yup, countries like Iraq, Iran..ect ect. You are brainwashed by "This was is about oil, this war is about Bush's interest". So you will never be happy with what is happening. Or your favorite one "Bush is a terrorist".

^^^

lol

A typical stereotype brainwashed American, who voted for Bush not once but twice.

Posted by hardcore trancer on Dec-29-2005 18:46:

quote:
Originally posted by ali92
Yes. I was speaking hypothetically. BTW, are you sure that they really voted him in & not like what happened in both of the last two presidential elections (2000 & 2004, especially 2000) in the US?

yes they did vote for him.you see when he was the candidate he was targeting the poor not the rich.The rich ones are the ones that dont want an islamic regime.The poor however are more religious and he basically told them what they wanted to hear(just like how Bush got the second vote from the red states by feeding the public the whole terrorism bullshit,the red states aka the not so rich and educated states gave him the vote).The majority of the population there arent rich.So he basically got alot of votes from the poor and uneducated.

Posted by Kapedano on Dec-29-2005 22:55:

quote:
Originally posted by Purple
^^^

lol

A typical stereotype brainwashed American, who voted for Bush not once but twice.

Yup, and I would vote for him another time if he could run again.

quote:
Originally posted by hardcore trancer
yes they did vote for him.you see when he was the candidate he was targeting the poor not the rich.The rich ones are the ones that dont want an islamic regime.The poor however are more religious and he basically told them what they wanted to hear(just like how Bush got the second vote from the red states by feeding the public the whole terrorism bullshit,the red states aka the not so rich and educated states gave him the vote).The majority of the population there arent rich.So he basically got alot of votes from the poor and uneducated.

You are calling the red states uneducated just because they voted for Bush, or not so rich. You do not know what you are talking about my friend, you are brainwashed.

Posted by Lepanto on Dec-30-2005 01:54:

Didn't the smartest people vote for Bush? Literally?

Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »