TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Gaming Forum
-- F.E.A.R.
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by Kaidreas on Jan-23-2006 19:01:

F.E.A.R.

I've played it last night. damn it's a hard game. and the tension damn... I'll give abit of advice: don't play this game in a dark room on your own. It reminded me of "the blair witch project"
the gameplay is good, but it's kinda hard. because the AI of your opponents is damn good. allmost real life
the scenery is amazing. But I think you need a good computer to play this game. When I played it. there was alot of delay when enemies started shooting at you. kinda difficult to shoot back
overall score=7

what do you guys think?


Posted by ga11agher on Jan-23-2006 20:45:

i thought i had a half decent machine till I put this on - damn it's slow with any decent resolution and damn ugly on the lower settings. A good game by all accounts but u need the hardware to run it. Half-Life 2 runs fine and looks good in comparison on my spec.

Oh well - time for an upgrade.


Posted by Trance Addix on Jan-24-2006 23:03:

Yeah, that is the first game im gonna get - when my new computer arrives .


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jan-25-2006 00:56:

piece of over-rated crap that was badly coded, far too short, and subpar when compared to either doom3 or HL2 on almost any level i consider important in gaming. all these level designers seem to fail dismally at creating realistic environments, they look static, un-lived in and after 100 or so rogue spear titles going back a decade, thoroughly uninspired.

no idea why people rate this game at all. *yawns*


Posted by Trance Addix on Jan-26-2006 02:14:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
piece of over-rated crap that was badly coded, far too short, and subpar when compared to either doom3 or HL2 on almost any level i consider important in gaming. all these level designers seem to fail dismally at creating realistic environments, they look static, un-lived in and after 100 or so rogue spear titles going back a decade, thoroughly uninspired.

no idea why people rate this game at all. *yawns*


Stop hating lol


Posted by Sunsnail on Jan-26-2006 03:54:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
piece of over-rated crap that was badly coded, far too short, and subpar when compared to either doom3 or HL2 on almost any level i consider important in gaming. all these level designers seem to fail dismally at creating realistic environments, they look static, un-lived in and after 100 or so rogue spear titles going back a decade, thoroughly uninspired.

no idea why people rate this game at all. *yawns*


most opinions ive seen on it have been opposite of that


Posted by DJ-MarkHills on Jan-26-2006 09:55:

I don't agree at all with it being subpar to Doom 3 and Half life 2.. i own all 3 games and f.e.a.r does something which neither doom 3 or half life 2 did.. it was original. It scares the hell out of you but not in the conventional shit jumping out at you from behind walls way like doom 3 did.. this really screws with your mind. ghosts and apparations mixed with the use of being able to go into slow motion make this game much more interesting and original than any other fps iv played... not to mention the fact that i recently jumped harder at f.e.ar than i ever did at doom 3, and trust me iv had some pant pissing moments in that game. *remembers that bugger coming from the floor*

half life 2 was absolutely immense no doubt, but you can't really compare it that way to f.e.a.r because they are completely different.

i love all 3 games, and i can't slate any of them.. they all have their own special attributes which make them very good.


Posted by Trance Addix on Jan-26-2006 22:49:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ-MarkHills
I don't agree at all with it being subpar to Doom 3 and Half life 2.. i own all 3 games and f.e.a.r does something which neither doom 3 or half life 2 did.. it was original. It scares the hell out of you but not in the conventional shit jumping out at you from behind walls way like doom 3 did.. this really screws with your mind. ghosts and apparations mixed with the use of being able to go into slow motion make this game much more interesting and original than any other fps iv played... not to mention the fact that i recently jumped harder at f.e.ar than i ever did at doom 3, and trust me iv had some pant pissing moments in that game. *remembers that bugger coming from the floor*

half life 2 was absolutely immense no doubt, but you can't really compare it that way to f.e.a.r because they are completely different.

i love all 3 games, and i can't slate any of them.. they all have their own special attributes which make them very good.


Yeah, in a way they are different games.


Posted by zolton on Jan-27-2006 18:38:

Satan (eek!)

its a shitty game, al that violence should be banned. This week i wanted to kill my neighbour because i was under influence of fear


Posted by Trance Addix on Jan-27-2006 19:42:

quote:
Originally posted by zolton
its a shitty game, al that violence should be banned. This week i wanted to kill my neighbour because i was under influence of fear


Haha, nice satire.


Posted by Sunsnail on Jan-29-2006 23:38:

Been playing it... I've only been scared enough once or twice to get chills. Im expecting more of out it.... No, its not as scary as Doom3


Posted by Sunsnail on Jan-31-2006 05:42:

Overall though, It's still a good game


Posted by Trance Addix on Jan-31-2006 22:24:

quote:
Originally posted by Sunsnail
Been playing it... I've only been scared enough once or twice to get chills. Im expecting more of out it.... No, its not as scary as Doom3


Doom 3 wasn't scary, just cool.


Posted by Magnus on Feb-01-2006 23:03:

quote:
Originally posted by ga11agher
i thought i had a half decent machine till I put this on - damn it's slow with any decent resolution and damn ugly on the lower settings. A good game by all accounts but u need the hardware to run it. Half-Life 2 runs fine and looks good in comparison on my spec.

Oh well - time for an upgrade.


Haha man same exact thing happened to me...


Posted by SuspicionVandit on Feb-02-2006 05:18:

FEAR loses half of its awesomeness when you have to lower the graphic settings to play.


Posted by Trance Addix on Feb-02-2006 05:20:

quote:
Originally posted by SuspicionVandit
FEAR loses half of its awesomeness when you have to lower the graphic settings to play.


Thats true for many PC games.


Posted by zolton on Feb-02-2006 18:33:

Smoking ..umm..something

damn, curious what i would be on a good pc


Posted by Trance Addix on Feb-02-2006 18:38:

quote:
Originally posted by zolton
damn, curious what i would be on a good pc


It would be awesome


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Feb-02-2006 23:48:

if a game loses its awesomeness becoz you have to turn the graphics down then the game cant have been that good in the first place.


Posted by Trance Addix on Feb-03-2006 00:02:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
if a game loses its awesomeness becoz you have to turn the graphics down then the game cant have been that good in the first place.


In game such as FEAR, the atmosphere is the game and we all know that the atmosphere is directly related with the graphics


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Feb-03-2006 00:28:

^^ well, like ive already stated, FEAR = bad coding. and atmosphere is a whole-package phenomena, not *just* graphics


Posted by Trance Addix on Feb-03-2006 00:38:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
^^ well, like ive already stated, FEAR = bad coding. and atmosphere is a whole-package phenomena, not *just* graphics


Graphics and sound are the too biggies; usually graphics is where the people struggle. Whats wrong with the coding?


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Feb-03-2006 01:39:

for the life of me i cant see how the look of the game = such bad frame rates on lower end machines. sure, i dont have a ninja machine but even at the lowest settings it still ran like a dog. whereas doom & HL ran fine at the medium settings, and looked awesome. room mate has a ninja PC and i think it looks like shit to be honest.

and i disagree with you when you say graphics and sound are the two biggies (tho i think theyre obv important). how about execution? or the ideas the game can implant in your head which creates the atmosphere. i thought AvP looked pretty shit when it came out yet the atmosphere was sensational.


Posted by Trance Addix on Feb-03-2006 01:49:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
for the life of me i cant see how the look of the game = such bad frame rates on lower end machines. sure, i dont have a ninja machine but even at the lowest settings it still ran like a dog. whereas doom & HL ran fine at the medium settings, and looked awesome. room mate has a ninja PC and i think it looks like shit to be honest.

and i disagree with you when you say graphics and sound are the two biggies (tho i think theyre obv important). how about execution? or the ideas the game can implant in your head which creates the atmosphere. i thought AvP looked pretty shit when it came out yet the atmosphere was sensational.


Excuse me, but what is AvP?


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Feb-03-2006 01:51:

alien versus predator


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.