TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- all about carbon dating
Pages (2): [1] 2 »

all about carbon dating

Ok question:

Do you think carbon dating is valid or not?

This isn't a question of evolution vs creation.

It's a question of...

my god this topic is boring.

NM

How can it not be valid?

quote:

Originally posted by UWM How can it not be valid?

You'd be surprised at the rationale some people manage to come up with but I've seen it all.


To answer your question DJFreaq, if you want more information than you would ever want to know, the attacks against Radiocarbon dating have been thoroughly analyzed (and rejected) a number of times in the PDD.

One thread that comes to mind:

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...ng&pagenumber=2

Or you can search through some of these other threads:

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...rder=descending

And the question is actually interesting if you're the type of person who wonders "why?" and "how?" as opposed to the type of person who wonders "ok." when confronted with something new.

danke!

I wouldn't date carbon.

the one on the right

I presume they're shemales?

quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Mystery I wouldn't date carbon.

Not even a sexy piece of graphite?

quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Mystery I wouldn't date carbon.

Why, Mr. Mystery! I do believe you very nearly made a joke!

Mr.Mystery is a ****.

On topic, carbon dating is alright with me. Makes more sense than creating the universe in 6 days (On the 7th, he rested. Ate a coffee cake, and drank some tea).

And what is the age of the earth in the bible? 10,000 years or something like that? Come on now, thats silly.

quote:

Originally posted by Radagast Why, Mr. Mystery! I do believe you very nearly made a joke!

Yeah, but then I kinda ran out of steam.

quote:

Mr.Mystery is a ****.

No, I don't believe I am 4 asterisks.

quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Mystery No, I don't believe I am 4 asterisk's.

Spell it out then.

C-u-n-t.

quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Mystery No, I don't believe I am 4 asterisk's.

4 star. Pretty good. If you had better toilet facilities you might have got 5.

quote:

Originally posted by Marc Summers Spell it out then. C-u-n-t.

Now now, I don't think a boy of your age should be using such big words.

quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Mystery Now now, I don't think a boy of your age should be using such big words.

My age? Boy?

Sorry, but I won't be part of your fantasy. I am 18, a bit old for your taste.

quote:

Originally posted by Marc Summers My age? Boy? Sorry, but I won't be part of your fantasy. I am 18, a bit old for your taste.

Yeah, a mere teen. Younger than my younger brother.

quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Mystery Yeah, a mere teen. Younger than my younger brother.

Wow, you must be old. I bet your the creepy balding guy at the clubs, arent you?

Sure, if it makes you happy.

quote:

Originally posted by Nou If it makes you happy It can't be that bad If it makes you happy Then why the hell are you so sad

I'm done, lol.

That just put me in a good mood.

quote:

Originally posted by Nou If it makes you happy It can't be that bad If it makes you happy Then why the hell are you so sad

DUDE ZOMG IS THAT TEH SHERYL CROW!!!

OMFG I <# HER

AND SHE'S DATING LANCE AMRSTRONG


this thread WAS about carbon dating, since it's so off topic, just let it die

carbon dating is only good for dating in thousands of years. not millions. and a lot of scientists are so biased that they throw out an undesired "date" because it doesnt fit they're timeline. it pisses me off at how biased the evolutionists are when clearly their theory has some problems to it. do they try to explain the problems? no. they prefer to silence the questioners as "religious nuts".

quote:

Originally posted by ::TranceVanDyk:: carbon dating is only good for dating in thousands of years. not millions. and a lot of scientists are so biased that they throw out an undesired "date" because it doesnt fit they're timeline. it pisses me off at how biased the evolutionists are when clearly their theory has some problems to it. do they try to explain the problems? no. they prefer to silence the questioners as "religious nuts".

Now you see Heinz, I believe your silence was self-imposed after we addressed every issue that you raised and pointed out that some of the sources you used had the academic credentials equivalent to McDonald's U. We were all breathlessly awaiting your response but alas, we were destined for disappointment. If you had read the radiocarbon thread, you would have seen acknowledgement that they don't use carbon dating past 50,000 years but instead use a different radiometric dating methodology such as argon-argon dating. Now I know you must be hard at work typing up all of your responses to the 20 or so evolution threads that you posted in in the PDD and then abruptly vanished, so I won't take up any more of your time.

quote:

Originally posted by Fundamental 4 star. Pretty good. If you had better toilet facilities you might have got 5.

yeah, sadly everyone pisses all over Nik.


mr summers - you got banned because you kept ctcp flooding me on there, you kinda irritated the others, and there's 2 gay ppl there, who wanted to be gay & u said that was ok as long as it wasn't around you, don't take offense

quote:

Originally posted by Ian yeah, sadly everyone pisses all over Nik.

Some might call it a fetish.



Er... I mean...




Nevermind...

quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Mystery Some might call it a fetish. Er... I mean... Nevermind...

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.